[Utility of the Filter Extraction Method for Detecting Anticancer Drug Contamination in Air].

The filter extraction method is a new, simple method for evaluating anticancer drug contamination in air. The method involves installing a filter in the exhaust port of an exhaust duct on a facility's air conditioner, then collecting and measuring fine particles of the antineoplastic agents adsorbed onto the filter. In this study, we analyzed the utility of maintaining continuous filter extraction for measuring cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil contamination. The filters were installed in 3 areas of an outpatient chemotherapy room and then left in place for approximately 5 months. Results revealed the presence of cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil in all 3 areas. However, the amounts and ratios of detected drugs differed among survey sites; this may have been caused by factors such as drug preparation, administration, and excretion. We conclude that the filter extraction method can be used continuously for monitoring anticancer drug contamination in air; thus, it can be utilized to monitor healthcare workers' occupational exposure to inhaled anticancer drugs. Indeed, the filter extraction method may be useful as a novel environmental monitoring technique.

[Significant Changes Associated with the Transition from Outsourcing to In-hospital Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Novel Antiepileptics].

For many of the novel antiepileptics, immunoassays, used for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), cannot be used. We could monitor eight novel antiepileptics using an LC/MS method since July 2017. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significant changes associated with the transition from outsourcing to in-hospital monitoring of novel antiepileptics. The number of measurements of novel antiepileptics was significantly increased during the first (p<0.01) and second (p<0.001) years of in-hospital monitoring as compared to that one year prior to in-hospital monitoring which was outsourced. The proportion of measurements of novel antiepileptics to all antiepileptics was 19.7%, 31.1%, and 38.4% during outsourcing, and first, and second years of in-hospital monitoring, respectively. The measurement cost was significantly reduced during the first (p<0.001) and second (p<0.001) years of in-hospital monitoring as compared to that during outsourcing. In addition, the revenue from TDM of antiepileptic drugs was significantly increased during the first (p<0.05) and second (p<0.01) years of in-hospital monitoring as compared with that during outsourcing. In conclusion, the switch from outsourcing to in-hospital monitoring led to an increase in the number of orders, a reduction in the measurement-related expenses of novel antiepileptics, and an increase in the revenue from TDM of antiepileptic drugs, which could promote the proper use of novel antiepileptics through TDM.