ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and use of INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates in Saudi Arabia from September 2013 to February 2017. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, before-after surveillance study on 14,961 patients in 37 intensive care units (ICUs) of 22 hospitals. During baseline, we performed outcome surveillance of VAP applying the definitions of the CDC/NHSN. During intervention, we implemented the IMA and the ISOS, which included: (1) a bundle of infection prevention practice interventions, (2) education, (3) outcome surveillance, (4) process surveillance, (5) feedback on VAP rates and consequences and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using generalized linear mixed models to estimate the effect of intervention. RESULTS: The baseline rate of 7.84 VAPs per 1000 mechanical-ventilator (MV)-days-with 20,927 MV-days and 164 VAPs-, was reduced to 4.74 VAPs per 1000 MV-days-with 118,929 MV-days and 771 VAPs-, accounting for a 39% rate reduction (IDR 0.61; 95% CI 0.5-0.7; P 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the IMA was associated with significant reductions in VAP rates in ICUs of Saudi Arabia.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cities/epidemiology , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in five intensive care units (ICUs) from October 2013 to September 2015. DESIGN: Prospective, before-after surveillance study of 3769 patients hospitalised in four adult ICUs and one paediatric ICU in five hospitals in five cities. During baseline, we performed outcome and process surveillance of CLABSI applying CDC/NHSN definitions. During intervention, we implemented IMA and ISOS, which included: (1) a bundle of infection prevention practice interventions; (2) education; (3) outcome surveillance; (4) process surveillance; (5) feedback on CLABSI rates and consequences; and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: During baseline, 4468 central line (CL) days and 31 CLABSIs were recorded, accounting for 6.9 CLABSIs per 1000 CL-days. During intervention, 12,027 CL-days and 37 CLABSIs were recorded, accounting for 3.1 CLABSIs per 1000 CL-days. The CLABSI rate was reduced by 56% (incidence-density rate, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.72; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing IMA through ISOS was associated with a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate in the ICUs of Saudi Arabia.
