Biomechanical Characteristics of Glenosphere Orientation Based on Tilting Angle and Overhang Changes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: Glenoid position and inclination are important factors in protecting against scapular notching, which is the most common complication that directly affects the longevity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation, comparing neutral tilt, inferior overhang with an eccentric glenosphere at the same placement of baseplate, and inferior tilt after 10° inferior reaming in the lower part of the glenoid in RSA. Methods: Nine cadaveric shoulders were tested with 5 combinations of customized glenoid components: a centric glenosphere was combined with a standard baseplate (group A); an eccentric glenosphere to provide 4-mm inferior overhang than the centric glenosphere was combined with a standard baseplate (group B); a centric glenosphere was combined with a wedge-shaped baseplate tilted inferiorly by 10° with the same center of rotation (group C); an eccentric glenosphere was attached to a wedge-shaped baseplate (group D); and 10° inferior reaming was performed on the lower part of the glenoid to apply 10° inferior tilt, with a centric glenosphere secured to the standard baseplate for simulation of clinical tilt (group E). Impingement-free angles for adduction, abduction, forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation were measured. The capability of the deltoid moment arm for abduction and forward flexion, deltoid length, and geometric analysis for adduction engagement were evaluated. Results: Compared with neutral tilt, inferior tilt at the same position showed no significant difference in impingement-free angle, moment arm capability, and deltoid length. However, group D resulted in better biomechanical properties than a central position, regardless of inferior tilt. Group E demonstrated a greater range of adduction, internal and external rotation, and higher abduction and forward flexion capability with distalization, compared to corresponding parameters for inferior tilt with a customized wedge-shaped baseplate. Conclusions: A 10° inferior tilt of the glenosphere, without changing the position of the baseplate, had no benefit in terms of the impingement-free angle and deltoid moment arm. However, an eccentric glenosphere had a significant advantage, regardless of inferior tilt. Inferior tilt through 10° inferior reaming showed better biomechanical results than neutral tilt due to the distalization effect.

Biomechanical Comparison of FiberLock Suspensionplasty and Flexor Carpi Radialis Ligament Reconstruction for Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic and load to failure characteristics of post-trapeziectomy suspensionplasty with the FiberLock Suspension System (FLSS; Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) to flexor carpi radialis ligament reconstruction (FCRLR). We hypothesized that the FLSS will have increased stiffness, yield, and ultimate load compared with FCRLR. METHODS: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric hands were used. One side of each pair was randomly assigned to receive the FCRLR or FLSS and the contralateral side received the other suspensionplasty. A complete trapeziectomy was performed followed by FLSS or FCRLR. Cyclic and load to failure characteristics were measured with loading in the distal to proximal direction. A preload of 1 N with 30 cycles of 1 N to 10 N was applied, followed by load to failure. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis (P < .05). RESULTS: The FLSS had significantly decreased nonrecoverable deformation and deformation at peak load during cyclic loading (P < .04). The FLSS also had significantly increased stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and load and energy absorbed at 10 mm displacement compared with FCRLR (P < .04). All 10 FCRLR specimens failed with suture tearing through the tendon. Nine FLSS specimens failed due to suture slipping from the SwiveLock anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) and 1 failed due to the FiberTak anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) pulling through the index metacarpal. CONCLUSION: Suspensionplasty with the FLSS demonstrated greater structural integrity compared with FCRLR following trapeziectomy. The FLSS procedure may result in decreased thumb subsidence and decreased construct failure.

Biomechanical characteristics of a new looping stitch versus the classic Krackow stitch for distal biceps fixation.

Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the biomechanical characteristics of a new looping stitch, developed with the concepts of a looping, locking stitch that decreases needle penetrations of the tendon, and compare it to a classic Krackow stitch for distal biceps suture-tendon fixation. Methods: The Krackow stitch with No. 2 braided suture and the looping stitch with a No. 2 braided suture loop attached to a 25-mm-length by 1.3-mm-width polyblend suture tape were compared. The Looping stitch was performed with single strand locking loops and wrapping suture around the tendon, resulting in half the needle penetrations through the graft compared to the Krackow stitch. Ten matched pairs of human distal biceps tendons were used. One side of each pair was randomly assigned to either the Krackow or the looping stitch, and the contralateral side was used for the other stitch. For biomechanical testing, each construct was preloaded to 5 N for 60 seconds, followed by cyclic loading to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N for 10 cycles each, and then loaded to failure. The deformation of the suture-tendon construct, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load were quantified. Comparisons between the Krackow and looping stitches were performed with a paired t-test using P < .05 as statistically significant. Results: The Krackow stitch and looping stitch had no significant difference in stiffness, peak deformation, or nonrecoverable deformation after 10 cycles of loading to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N. There was no difference between the Krackow stitch and looping stitch in load applied to displacement of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm. The ultimate load showed that the looping stitch was significantly stronger compared to the Krackow stitch (Krackow stitch: 223.7 ± 50.3 N; looping stitch: 312.7 ± 53.8 N) (P = .002). The failure modes were either suture breakage or tendon cut through. For the Krakow stitch, there was 1 suture breakage and 9 tendons cut through. For the looping stitch, there were five suture breakages, and five tendons cut through. Conclusions: With fewer needle penetrations, incorporation of 100% of the tendon diameter, and a higher ultimate load to failure compared to the Krackow stitch, the Looping stitch may be a viable option to reduce deformation, failure, and cut-out of the suture-tendon construct.

The biomechanical effects of acromial fracture angulation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The biomechanical changes and treatment guidelines on acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are still not well understood. The purpose of our study was to analyze the biomechanical changes with respect to acromial fracture angulation in RSA. METHODS: RSA was performed on 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. An acromial osteotomy was performed on the plane extending from the glenoid surface to simulate an acromion fracture. Four conditions of acromial fracture inferior angulation were evaluated (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° angulation). The middle deltoid muscle loading origin position was adjusted based on the position of each acromial fracture. The impingement-free angle and capability of the deltoid to produce movement in the abduction and forward flexion planes were measured. The length of the anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid was also analyzed for each acromial fracture angulation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the abduction impingement angle between 0° (61.8° ± 2.9°) and 10° angulation (55.9° ± 2.8°); however, the abduction impingement angle of 20° (49.3° ± 2.9°) significantly decreased from 0° and 30° angulation (44.2° ± 4.6°), and 30° angulation significantly differed from 0° and 10° (P < .01). On forward flexion, 10° (75.6° ± 2.7°), 20° (67.9° ± 3.2°), and 30° angulation (59.8° ± 4.0°) had a significantly decreased impingement-free angle than 0° (84.2° ± 4.3°; P < .01), and 30° angulation had a significantly decreased impingement-free angle than 10°. On analysis of glenohumeral abduction capability, 0° significantly differed (at 12.5, 15.0, 17.5, and 20.0N) from 20° and 30°. For forward flexion capability, 30° angulation showed a significantly smaller value than 0° (15N vs. 20N). As acromial fracture angulation increased, the middle and posterior deltoid muscles of 10°, 20°, and 30° became shorter than those of 0°; however, no significant change was found in the anterior deltoid length. CONCLUSIONS: In acromial fractures at the plane of glenoid surface, 10° inferior angulation of the acromion did not interfere with abduction and abduction capability. However, 20° and 30° of inferior angulation caused prominent impingement in abduction and forward flexion and reduced abduction capability. In addition, there was a significant difference between 20° and 30°, suggesting that not only the location of the acromion fracture after RSA but also the degree of angulation are important factors for shoulder biomechanics.

Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to quantify the biomechanical effectiveness of lateralization in RTSA with respect to glenoid and humeral component configurations. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom shoulder testing system. Three parameters, including the glenosphere thickness, humeral tray offset, and insert thickness, were assessed by implanting 8 configurations on each specimen. Humeral position, maximum internal rotation, and maximum external rotation (ER) before impingement were quantified at 0° and 30° glenohumeral abduction. The adduction angle at which the humeral component contacted the inferior scapular neck and the abduction angle where acromial notching occurred were also measured. The simulated active range of motion, including ER and abduction capability, was tested by increasing the load applied to the remaining posterior cuff and middle deltoid, respectively. Stability was evaluated by the forces that induced anterior dislocation at 30° abduction. RESULTS: The thicker glenosphere affected only lateralization, whereas the centric humeral tray and thicker insert significantly affected humeral lateralization and distalization simultaneously. Greater adduction and ER angles were found in more lateralized humerus. A significant positive correlation between humeral lateralization and ER capability was observed; however, lateralization did not significantly improve implant stability in this cadaveric testing system. CONCLUSION: Lateralization is achievable at both the glenoid and humeral sides but has different effects; therefore, lateralized implant options should be selected according to patients' needs. Lateralization is an effective strategy for reducing adduction notching while increasing ER capability. Thicker glenospheres only affected humeral lateralization. The centric humeral tray would be selected for less distalization to avoid overlengthening, whereas an eccentric humeral tray is the most effective for distalization and medialization in reducing abduction notching to the acromion and for patients with pseudoparalysis.

2022 Bernard Morrey Award: the elbow ulnar collateral ligament complex demonstrates region specific stretching and recovery characteristics with valgus loading.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to quantify the valgus laxity and strain of the elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) complex after repeated valgus stretching and subsequent recovery. Understanding these changes may have important implications in improving strategies for injury prevention and treatment. The hypothesis was that the UCL complex will demonstrate a permanent increase in valgus laxity and region-specific increase in strain as well as region-specific recovery characteristics. METHODS: Ten cadaveric elbows (7M, 3F, 61.7 ± 2.7 years) were used. Valgus angle and strain of the anterior and posterior bands of the anterior bundle and the posterior bundle were measured at 1 Nm, 2.5 Nm, 5 Nm, 7.5 Nm, and 10 Nm of valgus torque at 70° of flexion for: (1) intact UCL, (2) stretched UCL, and (3) rested UCL. To stretch the UCL, elbows were cycled with increasing valgus torque at 70° of flexion (10 Nm-20 Nm in 1 Nm increments) until the valgus angle increased 8° from the intact valgus angle measured at 1Nm. This position was held for 30 minutes. Specimens were then unloaded and rested for 2 hours. Linear mixed effects model with Tukey's post hoc test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Stretching significantly increased valgus angle compared to the intact condition 3.2° ± 0.2° (P < .001). Strains of both the anterior and posterior bands of the anterior bundle were significantly increased from intact by 2.8% ± 0.9% (P = .015) and 3.1% ± 0.9% (P = .018), respectively at 10 Nm. Strain in the distal segment of the anterior band was significantly higher than the proximal segment with loads of 5 Nm and higher (P < .030). After resting, the valgus angle significantly decreased from the stretched condition by 1.0° ± 0.1° (P < .001) but failed to recover to intact levels (P < .004). After resting, the posterior band had a significantly increased strain compared to the intact state of 2.6% ± 1.4% (P = .049) while the anterior band was not significantly different from intact. CONCLUSION: After repeated valgus loading and subsequent resting, the UCL complex demonstrated permanent stretching with some recovery but not to intact levels. The anterior band demonstrated increased strain in the distal segment compared to the proximal segment with valgus loading. The anterior band was able to recover to strain levels similar to intact after resting, while the posterior band did not.

Latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tear improves kinematics and internal rotation compared to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer.

INTRODUCTION: Latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) tendon transfer has demonstrated better clinical outcomes compared to Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer for irreparable anterosuperior cuff (subscapularis/supraspinatus) tears; however, the biomechanical effects of these procedures are unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare kinematics and internal rotation of LDTM transfer to LD transfer for anterosuperior cuff tear. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested in four conditions; (1) intact, (2) anterosuperior rotator cuff tear, (3) LDTM transfer, and (4) LD transfer. Glenohumeral kinematics and internal rotation at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane were measured. Muscle loading was applied based on physiological cross-sectional area ratios with three muscle loading conditions to simulate potentially increased tension due to the advanced insertion site of the transferred tendons. RESULTS: The anterosuperior rotator cuff tear leads to a significant superior shift of the humeral head compared to intact at 0° and 30° abduction (p < 0.039). Both the LDTM (p < 0.047) and LD transfers (p < 0.032) significantly shifted the humeral head inferiorly compared to the tear condition.; however, the LDTM transfer shifted the head in the anteroinferior direction compared to the LD transfer at 60° abduction and 30° ER (p < 0.045). Both LDTM and LD transfer significantly increased internal resting rotation (p < 0.008) and maximum internal rotation (p < 0.008) compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact at 30° and 60° abduction. LDTM transfer resulted in a significant internal resting rotation compared with the LD transfer at 30° abduction with double muscle loading (p = 0.02). At 0° abduction, the LDTM transfer (p < 0.027) significantly increased maximum internal rotation compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact. CONCLUSION: Although both LDTM and LD tendon transfer improved the abnormal humeral head apex position and internal rotation compared with the tear condition, the LDTM transfer was biomechanically superior to the LD transfer in a cadaveric model.

Biomechanical comparison of combined latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer vs. latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in shoulders with irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) can result in a gradual loss of active elevation and internal rotation, superior and anterior translation of the humeral head, and cuff tear arthropathy. Joint-preserving treatment options for IASRCTs in young and high-demand elderly patients remain a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical efficacy of the combined latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon (LDTM) transfer and compare it to an isolated latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer in a cadaveric IASRCT model. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 68.3 ± 5.2 years; range 58-71) were tested with a custom shoulder testing system. All specimens were tested at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane under 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) IASRCT, (3) combined LDTM transfer, and (4) isolated LD transfer. The superior and anteroinferior translation and subacromial contact pressure were measured. The effects of 3 different LD and LDTM muscle loading conditions were investigated to determine the effectiveness of the muscle transfer conditions. A linear mixed effect model was used for statistical analysis, followed by a Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: IASRCTs significantly increased superior translation, anteroinferior translation, and subacromial peak contact pressure. Combined LDTM transfer significantly decreased superior and anteroinferior translation compared with IASRCTs in all positions and muscle loadings. Isolated LD transfer did not significantly decrease superior (P > .115) and anteroinferior translation (P > .151) compared to IASRCT at any abduction and muscle loads except superior translation at 60° abduction and 90° of external rotation (ER) (P < .036). LDTM transfer also significantly decreased peak contact pressure from the IASRCT condition at every abduction angle (P < .046). However, isolated LD transfer significantly decreased subacromial peak contact pressure only at 30° abduction and 0° and 30° of ER with triple loading (P < .048), as well as at 60° abduction and 90° of ER (P < .003). CONCLUSIONS: Combined LDTM transfer decreased superior translation, anteroinferior translation, and subacromial contact pressure compared with the IASRCT condition. Isolated LD transfer did not improve glenohumeral translation and subacromial contact pressure. Combined LDTM transfer may be a more reliable treatment option than isolated LD transfer in patients with an IASRCT.

Bilateral ovarian metastases from gastric carcinoma on FDG PET/CT.

We report PET/CT appearance of bilateral ovarian metastases in a 63-year-old female patient with newly diagnosed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach. She was also found to have peritoneal metastasis on an outside CT study. Staging PET/CT demonstrates not only the hypermetabolic gastric primary tumor and peritoneal disease but also bilateral enlarged, moderately active ovaries. The patient subsequently underwent biopsies of bilateral ovaries which revealed metastatic disease from primary gastric carcinoma. It is important to consider this form of neoplasm in the differential diagnosis because the treatment and prognosis will be different from a dyssynchronous primary tumor.