Asn-tRNA in Lactobacillus bulgaricus is formed by asparaginylation of tRNA and not by transamidation of Asp-tRNA.

In many organisms (e.g., gram-positive eubacteria) Gin-tRNA is not formed by direct glutaminylation of tRNAGln but by a specific transamidation of Glu-tRNAGln. We wondered whether a similar transamidation pathway also operates in the formation of Asn-tRNA in these organisms. Therefore we tested in S-100 preparations of Lactobacillus bulgaricus, a gram-positive eubacterium, for the conversion by an amidotransferase of [14C]Asp-tRNA to [14C]Asn-tRNA. As no transamidation was observed, we searched for genes for asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS). Two DNA fragments (from different locations of the L.bulgaricus chromosome) were found each containing an ORF whose sequence resembled that of the Escherichia coli asnS gene. The derived amino acid sequences of the two ORFs (432 amino acids) were the same and 41% identical with E.coli AsnRS. When one of the ORFs was expressed in E.coli, it complemented the temperature sensitivity of an E.coli asnS mutant. S-100 preparations of this transformant showed increased charging of unfractionated L.bulgaricus tRNA with asparagine. Deletion of the 3'-terminal region of the L.bulgaricus AsnRS gene led to loss of its complementation and aminoacylation properties. This indicates that L.bulgaricus contains a functional AsnRS. Thus, the transamidation pathway operates only for Gin-tRNAGln formation in this organism, and possibly in all gram-positive eubacteria.

Coexpression of eukaryotic tRNASer and yeast seryl-tRNA synthetase leads to functional amber suppression in Escherichia coli.

In order to gain insight into the conservation of determinants for tRNA identity between organisms, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and human amber suppressor serine tRNA genes have been examined for functional expression in Escherichia coli. The primary transcripts, which originated from E. coli plasmid promoters, were processed into mature tRNAs, but they were poorly aminoacylated in E. coli and thus were nonfunctional as suppressors in vivo. However, coexpression of cloned Saccharomyces cerevisiae seryl-tRNA synthetase led to efficient suppression in E. coli. This shows that some, but not all, determinants specifying the tRNASer identity are conserved in evolution.

The nucleotide sequence of 5S rRNA from bovine liver.

We have determined the nucleotide sequence of ribosomal 5S RNA from bovine liver. The comparison of this sequence with those from other eukaryotic sources shows that a common secondary structure model for all eukaryotic 5S rRNAs may exist. Analysis of the evolutionary conserved nucleotides in metazoan 5S rRNAs suggests that the tertiary interactions, proposed earlier for plant 5S rRNA, are also possible.

Application of a nuclease from rye nucleus for structural studies of plant ribonucleic acids.

A new nuclease (Rn) isolated from rye nucleus was applied for the structural studies of methionine initiator transfer ribonucleic acid and ribosomal 5S rRNA from yellow lupin seeds. The enzyme shows high specificity for some regions of both RNAs. The dihydrouridine and ribothymidine loops which are supposed to be involved in the tertiary interactions of the methionine initiator tRNA were hydrolysed. The anticodon loop is not digested at all. 5S rRNA was digested in single stranded regions (loops). The cleavage pattern of the tRNA and 5S rRNA obtained with Rn enzyme, suggests not only the high specificity toward single stranded regions, but also some dependence on their tertiary structure.

Higher plant 5S rRNAs share common secondary and tertiary structure. A new three domains model.

A new model of secondary and tertiary structure of higher plant 5S RNA is proposed. It consists of three helical domains: domain alpha includes stem I; domain beta contains stems II and III and loops B and C; domain gamma consists of stems IV and V and loops D and E. Except for, presumably, a canonical RNA-A like domain alpha, the two remaining domains apparently adopt a perturbed RNA-A structure due to irregularities within internal loops B and E and three bulges occurring in the model. Bending of RNA could bring loops B and E and/or C and D closer making tertiary interactions likely. The model differs from that suggested for eukaryotic 5S rRNA, by organization of domain gamma. Our model is based on the results of partial digestion obtained with single- and double-strand RNA specific nucleases. The proposed secondary structure is strongly supported by the observation that crude plant 5S rRNA contains abundant RNA, identified as domain gamma of 5S rRNA. Presumably it is excised from the 5S rRNA molecule by a specific nuclease present in lupin seeds. Experimental results were confirmed by computer-aided secondary structure prediction analysis of all higher plant 5S rRNAs. Differences observed between earlier proposed models and our proposition are discussed.

Molecular evolution of plants as deduced from changes in free energy of 5S ribosomal RNAs.

The nucleotide sequence of Pinus silvestyris 5S rRNA was determined using two independent methods and compared with other plant 5S rRNAs. It shows more than 90% sequence homology with gymnosperm 5S RNAs. The free energy (delta G) analysis of 5S rRNAs from gymnosperms, angiosperms and the other higher plants revealed that the free energy of this ribosomal RNA decreases with evolution.

Tertiary structure and computer modeling of plant 5S ribosomal RNA.

A new model of secondary and tertiary structure of higher plant 5S rRNA is proposed. It consists of three domains. Domain alpha includes stem I and loop A; domain beta contains stems II and III and loops B and C; domain gamma consists of stems IV and V and loops D and E. We propose that the domains beta and gamma adopt RNA-A like structure due to irregularities caused by the different in size internal loops B and E and the bulges occurring in the model. A suggested bending of RNA could bring single stranded fragments of domains beta and gamma close enough to each other to allow tertiary interactions. The new model of plant 5S rRNA differs from those suggested previously for eukaryotic 5S rRNA, by arrangement of the domains beta and gamma and the base pairing scheme of domain gamma. The model is based on our results of partial digestion obtained with single and double strand specific nucleases. The experimental results were confirmed by computer aided secondary structure prediction analysis of all higher plant 5S rRNAs and computer modeling using energy minimalization approach. Further support of our model have been provided by experiments including alpha sarcin, ribonuclease H and chemical modifications.

The calculation of plant 5S rRNAs secondary structure.

Using commercially available computer software package for ribonucleic acid (RNA) secondary structure analysis we calculated the free energy (delta G) of all higher plant 5S rRNA species. To gain insight into the relation between structure (nucleotide sequence) and free energy we generated point mutants of plant 5S rRNA and calculated their secondary structure. This analysis permitted to identify single sites which affect the stability and conformation of RNA molecule. Furthermore, the calculated data were compared with the electrophoretic mobility of 5S rRNA on polyacrylamide gels.

The nucleotide sequence of ribosomal 5S RNA from Rhizobium meliloti: comparison with 5S rRNA of Agrobacterium.

The complete nucleotide sequence of R. meliloti 5S ribosomal RNA has been determined and compared with the already known sequence of A. tumefaciens 5S rRNA (Vandenberghe et al., 1985, Eur. J. Biochem., 149, 537-542) and of other 5S rRNAs from Rodobacteria Alpha-2 (Wolters et al., 1988, Nucleic Acids Res., 16, rl-r70). The differences found at eight positions (23, 73, 83, 72 in helical fragments; 16, 40, 88 in loops; 54 in bulge), which might affect secondary structures of 5S rRNA, are small. Moreover, the sequence analysis specifies both variable and common positions in 5S rRNA secondary structure of Rodobacteria Alpha-2.