Efficacy and safety of 1064-nm fractional picosecond laser for the treatment of postmastectomy scars in transgender men: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Subcutaneous mastectomy is a crucial component of gender affirmation therapy for transgender men (TM), but the scars that result from this procedure can frequently impair their quality of life. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 1064-nm fractional picosecond laser (FxPico) treatment for hypertrophic and atrophic postmastectomy scars in TM. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with a total of 35 pairs of bilateral symmetric mastectomy scars were enrolled. One of each pair of symmetric scars was randomly assigned to receive four FxPico treatments at 4-week intervals. All scars were evaluated using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) and three-dimensional imaging for scar roughness, melanin index, and hemoglobin index before each treatment session and at 1, 3, and 6 months following the last treatment. Additionally, participant-rated scar satisfaction (PSS) and scar improvement (Global Assessment Score, GAS), as well as adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up period after the end of laser treatment sessions, the treated scars showed significant reductions in the mVSS compared to the untreated controls (p < 0.001), whereas the melanin index and hemoglobin index were not significantly different. Subgroup analysis of hypertrophic scars demonstrated statistically significant reductions in mVSS at 1 (p = 0.003) and 3 months (p = 0.041) after the end of laser treatments. PSS was significantly higher on the laser-treated scars than the controls (p = 0.008), and a participant-rated GAS of 2.95 ± 0.65 was found. There were no serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: 1064-nm FxPico could be utilized to treat mastectomy scars among TM, particularly the hypertrophic type.

Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccine versus Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Injections in the Treatment of Palmoplantar and Periungual Warts: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar and periungual warts tend to be recalcitrant. Intralesional immunotherapy can provide high efficacy with additional benefit to distant warts. However, evidence on comparative effects between intralesional immunotherapy with measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (MMR) and tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) and roles of dermoscopy in predicting treatment outcomes in palmoplantar/periungual warts is limited. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional MMR and PPD injections in treatment of palmoplantar/periungual warts and explore associations between dermoscopic findings and treatment outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients with palmoplantar/periungual warts who were equally assigned to receive MMR or PPD. Intralesional injection was done every 2 weeks until clearance or maximum of 5 treatments. RESULTS: Complete resolution was higher in MMR than PPD group (90.0% vs. 80.0% in index lesion and 81.3% vs. 54.6% in distant lesions, respectively), although the differences were statistically nonsignificant. Dermoscopic findings were not significantly associated with complete resolution. Local swelling, i.e., the most common adverse event, occurred more frequently in PPD (40.0%) than MMR group (10.0%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that intralesional immunotherapy with either MMR or PPD is efficacious in palmoplantar/periungual warts, with MMR showing a trend toward higher clearance and lower adverse events.

Randomized, evaluator-blinded comparative study of a potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) 532-nm picosecond laser and an alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians.

BACKGROUND: Various pigment-specific lasers can be used to treat solar lentigines. However, the most effective treatment options remain to be explored to reduce complications, such as postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, especially in dark-skinned patients. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety between the KTP 532-nm picosecond laser and the alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who had at least two solar lentigines on their arms were enrolled. A total of 30 paired lentiginous lesions were randomly selected for a single treatment with either a KTP 532-nm picosecond laser or an alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser. Mean luminance score (L*) was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks to determine treatment efficacy. Improvement was assessed by a blinded physician using a 5-point score. Satisfaction was rated by patients using a visual analog scale. All adverse events were documented. RESULTS: All 30 patients completed the study. Both lasers showed significant improvement in mean L* from baseline (p < 0.001). With the parameter settings employed, lesions treated with the alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser showed greater improvement in mean L* when compared with treatment with the KTP 532-nm picosecond laser at 12 weeks follow-up (p = 0.002). According to physician scoring, more than 50% improvement was observed in 25 and 19 lesions of the alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser group and the KTP 532-nm picosecond laser group, respectively. Adverse events did not differ between groups. A significantly higher satisfaction score was observed with the alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser at the last visit (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Both types of picosecond laser may be used to treat solar lentigines. Proper treatment settings and endpoint observation are the most important factor to achieve a successful outcome.

A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing efficacy between low-fluence alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser and low-fluence neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of ultraviolet B-induced hyperpigmentation.

BACKGROUND: Hyperpigmentation is a common concern of patients in dermatology clinics. Although there are many treatment options, lasers are considered a promising therapy for various hyperpigmentary conditions. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of alexandrite 755-nm picosecond and neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond lasers for the treatment of ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced hyperpigmentation in Asians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded study was conducted. UVB-induced hyperpigmentation was performed in three spots by narrowband UVB. After 2 weeks, these three spots were allocated into 755-treated, 1064-treated, and control sites. Patients received weekly laser treatments for five sessions. Follow-ups were scheduled at 1 and 2 months after the last session. RESULTS: Twenty patients attended the study. Overall, 755-nm and 1064-nm picosecond lasers showed a significant improvement in the mean lightness index (L*) compared to the control site, which started at Day 49 and Day 77, respectively. The mean L* of the 755-nm-treated site was also higher than that of the 1064-nm-treated site at Day 105 (p ≤ 0.001). Initially, the mean L*, physician's visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction with the 1064-nm picosecond laser were better than those with the 755-nm picosecond laser. Nevertheless, an inversion of the mean L* and VAS was noted at Day 49, whereas the mean patient satisfaction was noted at Day 77. In the subgroup analysis, a 755-nm picosecond laser effectively treated Fitzpatrick skin types (FPTs) III and IV. However, the mean L* of the 1064-nm picosecond laser was not significantly different from that of the control for FPT4. CONCLUSION: The alexandrite 755-nm picosecond and Nd:YAG 1064-nm picosecond lasers appear to be effective and safe modalities for treating UVB-induced hyperpigmentation. With the setting employed in this study, the outcome after the 755-nm picosecond laser treatment seemed superior to that of the 1064-nm picosecond laser treatment, especially for FPT4.

Liver fibrosis prevalence and risk factors in patients with psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Patients with psoriasis are more likely than matched controls in the general population to have advanced liver fibrosis; however, our understanding of these patients is limited. There is currently no systematic evaluation of the prevalence and risk factors of liver fibrosis in psoriasis patients. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of psoriasis patients who are at high or low risk for advanced liver fibrosis and determine the risk factors for developing liver fibrosis. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from the dates of their inception till May 2022, using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Any observational study describing the prevalence and/or risk factors for liver fibrosis in patients with psoriasis was included. Results: Patients with psoriasis at high risk for advanced liver fibrosis had a pooled prevalence of 9.66% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.92-12.75%, I 2 = 76.34%], whereas patients at low risk for advanced liver fibrosis had a pooled prevalence of 77.79% (95% CI: 73.23-82.05%, I 2 = 85.72%). Studies that recruited methotrexate (MTX)-naïve patients found a lower prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis (4.44, 95% CI: 1.17-9.22%, I 2 = 59.34%) than those that recruited MTX-user cohorts (12.25, 95% CI: 6.02-20.08%, I 2 = 82.34%). Age, sex, BMI, PASI score, psoriasis duration, MTX cumulative dose, and the prevalence of obesity, MTX users, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome were not identified as sources of heterogeneity by meta-regression analysis. The pooled odds ratios for age >50 years, BMI > 30, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome were 2.20 (95% CI: 1.42-3.40, I 2 = 0%), 3.67 (95% CI: 2.37-5.68, I 2 = 48.8%), 6.23 (95% CI: 4.39-8.84, I 2 = 42.4%), 2.82 (95% CI: 1.68-4.74, I 2 = 0%), 3.08 (95% CI: 1.90-4.98, I 2 = 0%), and 5.98 (95% CI: 3.63-9.83, I 2 = 17%), respectively. Conclusion: Approximately 10% of the population with psoriasis is at high risk for advanced liver fibrosis, while 78% are at low risk. Patients over the age of 50 with obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or metabolic syndrome have an increased risk of developing liver fibrosis, necessitating monitoring. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022303886], identifier [CRD42022303886].

A study of combined microfocused ultrasound and hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of enlarged facial pores in Asians.

BACKGROUND: Enlarged facial pores are a common cosmetic complaint in practice. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) and low-degree crosslinked hyaluronic acid filler (L-HA) injection has recently become a popular procedure for skin rejuvenation. The effectiveness of the combined MFU-V and L-HA injection in the treatment of enlarged pores has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of MFU-V monotherapy (single technique) and MFU-V combined with L-HA injection (combined technique) for the treatment of enlarged facial pores in Asians. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, split-face study on participants with enlarged facial pores. Each side of the face was randomly assigned to treatment with one session of single technique or combined technique. Pore volume was objectively measured by an Antera 3D® system. Subjective assessment was evaluated by one-blinded physician using a pore grading score (0-4). Patients rated the improvement in terms of satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). RESULTS: Forty-six participants completed the study. The mean pore volume of both sides declined with statistical significance at every visit compared to baseline, with the lowest mean at 4 months post-treatment. The combined technique showed a lower mean pore volume than single technique throughout the follow-ups. Physician's subjective evaluation showed no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. The patient satisfaction score showed a similar trend to the mean pore volume, with a statistically significant difference at 4 and 6 months post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are effectively minimize enlarged facial pores. The combined technique resulted in more patient satisfaction.