Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Oncol ; 11(2): 208-219, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28106345

ABSTRACT

An accurate blood-based RAS mutation assay to determine eligibility of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients for anti-EGFR therapy would benefit clinical practice by better informing decisions to administer treatment independent of tissue availability. The objective of this study was to determine the level of concordance between plasma and tissue RAS mutation status in patients with mCRC to gauge whether blood-based RAS mutation testing is a viable alternative to standard-of-care RAS tumor testing. RAS testing was performed on plasma samples from newly diagnosed metastatic patients, or from recurrent mCRC patients using the highly sensitive digital PCR technology, BEAMing (beads, emulsions, amplification, and magnetics), and compared with DNA sequencing data of respective FFPE (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded) tumor samples. Discordant tissue RAS results were re-examined by BEAMing, if possible. The prevalence of RAS mutations detected in plasma (51%) vs. tumor (53%) was similar, in accord with the known prevalence of RAS mutations observed in mCRC patient populations. The positive agreement between plasma and tumor RAS results was 90.4% (47/52), the negative agreement was 93.5% (43/46), and the overall agreement (concordance) was 91.8% (90/98). The high concordance of plasma and tissue results demonstrates that blood-based RAS mutation testing is a viable alternative to tissue-based RAS testing.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/blood , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Genes, ras , Mutation , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Female , Humans , Male
2.
Sci Rep ; 3: 1659, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23584600

ABSTRACT

Melanoma patients with BRAF mutations respond to treatment with vemurafenib, thus creating a need for accurate testing of BRAF mutation status. We carried out a blinded study to evaluate various BRAF mutation testing methodologies in the clinical setting. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded melanoma samples were macrodissected before screening for mutations using Sanger sequencing, single-strand conformation analysis (SSCA), high resolution melting analysis (HRM) and competitive allele-specific TaqMan® PCR (CAST-PCR). Concordance of 100% was observed between the Sanger sequencing, SSCA and HRM techniques. CAST-PCR gave rapid and accurate results for the common V600E and V600K mutations, however additional assays are required to detect rarer BRAF mutation types found in 3-4% of melanomas. HRM and SSCA followed by Sanger sequencing are effective two-step strategies for the detection of BRAF mutations in the clinical setting. CAST-PCR was useful for samples with low tumour purity and may also be a cost-effective and robust method for routine diagnostics.


Subject(s)
DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Melanoma/genetics , Paraffin Embedding/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Australia , Female , Formaldehyde , Humans , Male , Single-Blind Method , Tissue Fixation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...