Community-integrated self-collected HPV-based cervix screening in a low-resource rural setting: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial.

Effective approaches to improve coverage of self-collected human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervix screening (SCS) as well as attendance at treatment for HPV-positive participants are needed to inform policy on optimal integration of cervical cancer screening programs within existing infrastructure in low-resource settings. ASPIRE Mayuge was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in rural Mayuge district, Uganda, comparing the superiority of two recruitment implementation strategies for SCS: Door-to-Door versus Community Health Day. Villages were randomized (unblinded) to a strategy, and participants aged 25-49 years with no previous history of hysterectomy or treatment for cervical cancer or pre-cancer were eligible. Participants completed a survey and participated in SCS. The primary outcome was rate of attendance at treatment after a positive SCS. The trial randomized 31 villages and 2,019 participants included in these analyses (Door-to-Door: 16 clusters, 1,055 participants; Community Health Day: 15 clusters, 964 participants). Among HPV-positive participants, attendance at treatment rates were 75% (Door-to-Door) and 67% (Community Health Day) (P = 0.049). Participants in the Community Health Day intervention were less likely to attend treatment compared to Door-to-Door (risk ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.96). No adverse events were reported. Policymakers in low-resource settings can use these results to guide implementation of SCS programs. ISRCTN registration: 12767014 . ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04000503 .

"We Shall Tell them with Love, Inform them what we have Learnt and then Allow them to go" - Men's Perspectives of Self-Collected Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Inquiry.

Uganda has high incidence rates of cervical cancer (47.5/100,000/year) due to limited screening access. In settings where men hold most of the decision-making power, they play an important role in women's uptake of cervical cancer screening. We aimed to capture men's knowledge, beliefs and perspectives about cervical cancer, community-based screening and health system barriers. Focus group discussions were conducted with men in rural Uganda. Data were verbatim translated and transcribed into English. Transcripts were analysed in ATLAS.ti using a deductive approach of thematic content analysis and applied to an implementation research framework. Twenty-three men participated in focus groups. Men held poor knowledge of cervical cancer, its causes and treatment. Men felt screening would be acceptable by women if men and women were educated. Men highlighted health system barriers to accessing screening including: 1) poor-quality health services, 2) large distances to facilities/lack of affordable transportation and 3) lack of health workers/mistreatment by health workers. Men described supporting women through assisting with transportation, psychosocial support and sharing information. They requested services for men to be decentralized alongside community outreaches for cervical cancer screening. Engaging men in the implementation, education and planning of community-based cervical cancer screening programs is critical. Not engaging men is a missed opportunity to provide them with services and education. Concerted efforts must be made in educating men and reducing health system barriers to ensure rural women receive cervical cancer screening and follow-up care in low-income settings. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04000503; Registered 27 June 2019.

Experiences with thermal ablation for cervical precancer treatment after self-collection HPV-based screening in the ASPIRE Mayuge randomized trial.

Cervical cancer remains a significant public health burden in low-resourced countries. Thus, the WHO prioritized cervix screening, and recently recommended thermal ablation treatment for cervical precancer. However, there is limited information on side effects during treatment and recovery, and acceptability among those treated. The ASPIRE Mayuge trial recruited women to participate in self-collection cervix screening between 2019 and 2020 (N = 2019). Screen-positive women (N = 531, 26.3%) were referred for visual inspection with acetic acid and thermal ablation treatment, per Uganda Ministry of Health recommendations; 71.2% of those referred attended follow-up. Six months post-screening, a subset of trial participants were recontacted. Those who received thermal ablation completed a survey assessing side effects during and after the procedure, and willingness to recommend the treatment to others. We summarized the results to describe the side effects and acceptability of thermal ablation treatment. Of 2019 participants, 349 (17%) received thermal ablation. A subset of 135 completed the follow-up survey, where 90% reported pain during treatment; however, intensity and duration were low. Over a third of women reported problems with recovery for reasons including pain, discharge and bleeding. Regardless, 98% reported they would recommend the treatment to others. The use of thermal ablation to treat cervical precancer appears to be highly acceptable in this population. While many women reported side effects during the procedure and recovery, the majority said they would recommend the treatment to others. However, given the substantial proportion who reported problems with recovery, efforts should be made to provide additional resources to women after receiving thermal ablation treatment for cervical precancer.

Acceptability and preferences for self-collected screening for cervical cancer within health systems in rural Uganda: A mixed-methods approach.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the knowledge, preferences, and barriers for self-collected cervical cancer screening (SC-CCS) and follow-up care at the individual and health system level to inform the implementation of community-based SC-CCS. METHODS: Surveys and focus group discussions (FGDs) with women and FGDs with healthcare providers were conducted in Uganda. Survey data were analyzed using frequencies and FGD data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Data were triangulated between methods. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were surveyed and 58 participated in FGDs. Facilitators to screening access included decentralization, convenience, privacy, confidentiality, knowledge, and education. Barriers to accessing screening included lack of transportation and knowledge, long wait times, difficulty accessing health care, and lack of trust in the health system. Additional implementation challenges included insufficiently trained human resources and lack of infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Integrating SC-CCS within rural health systems in low-resource settings has been under-evaluated. Community-based SC-CSS could prevent high cervical cancer-related mortalities while working within the human and financial resource limitations of rural health systems. SC-CCS is acceptable to women and healthcare providers. By addressing rural women's preferences and barriers to care, decision-makers can build health systems that provide community-centered care close to women's homes across the care continuum.