Reimbursement for Hip Fractures: The Impact of Varied Current Procedural Terminology Coding Using Relative Value Units.

BACKGROUND: Many orthopedic practices routinely code hip fracture hemiarthroplasty as Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 27125 even though 27236 is the correct CPT code. Our objective is to determine the financial impact this simple mistake has on surgeon reimbursement. METHODS: Our data comprised cases assigned International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code S72.001A through S72.035A and CPT code 27125 or 27236 within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2016-2017 database. Relative value units (RVUs) per CPT code and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported that RVU conversion factor of $36.0896 per 1 RVU was used to calculate reimbursement per case. The dollar difference and percent difference per case was then calculated between cases assigned CPT code 27125 and those assigned 27236. RESULTS: Our total sample consisted of 12,287 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cases. Of those, 4185 (34%) were cases of a hip fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty that were incorrectly coded as CPT code 27125. That error in coding results in a decrease in reimbursement of $35.01 per case, a 5.51% difference. CONCLUSION: Since the current healthcare reimbursement model relies solely on CPT codes to determine RVUs, it is imperative that orthopedic surgeons understand the financial impact of incorrect coding. Although correct coding of hemiarthroplasty procedures for hip fractures is an easy task to fix in the future, we hope that through this study a greater emphasis is placed on coding in orthopedic surgery.

Postacute Management of Older Adults Suffering an Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Consensus Statement From the International Geriatric Fracture Society.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients require postacute care (PAC) after a hip fracture. Despite its importance, there is no established consensus regarding the standards of care provided to hip fracture patients in PAC facilities. METHODOLOGY: A writing group was created by professionals from the International Geriatric Fracture Society (IGFS) with representation from other organizations. The focus of the statements included in this article is toward PAC providers located in nursing facilities. Contributions were integrated in a single document that underwent several reviews by each author and then underwent a final review by the lead and senior authors. After this process was completed, the document was appraised by reviewers from IGFS. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: A total of 15 statements were crafted. These statements summarize the best available evidence and is intended to help PAC facilities managing older adults with hip fractures more efficiently, aiming toward overall better outcomes in the areas of function, quality of life, and with less complications that could interfere with their optimal recovery.

Ankle Fractures: An Expert Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members and Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: To describe current practice patterns of orthopaedic trauma experts regarding the management of ankle fractures, to review the current literature, and to provide recommendations for care based on a standardized grading system. DESIGN: Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members. METHODS: A 27-item web-based questionnaire was advertised to members of the OTA. Using a cross-sectional survey study design, we evaluated the preferences in diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six of 1967 OTA members (8.4%) completed the survey (16% of active members). There is considerable variability in the preferred method of diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures among the members surveyed. Most responses are in keeping with best evidence available. CONCLUSIONS: Current controversy remains in the management of ankle fractures. This is reflected in the treatment preferences of the OTA members who responded to this survey. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiogram on Mortality and Surgical Timing in Elderly Adults with Hip Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) on mortality, postoperative complications, surgical timing, and length of stay in individuals with surgically treated hip fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of hospital records. SETTING: Level I and II trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals consecutively surgically treated for hip fracture (N = 694). MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and injury characteristic, operative timing, preoperative echocardiogram, complications, mortality. Primary outcome measure was in hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Secondary outcome measures were complications (particularly cardiovascular) and time required for medical clearance and operative treatment. RESULTS: Preoperative TTE was performed on 131 individuals (18.9%). There was no difference between the TTE group and the control group in hospital (3.8% vs 1.8%, P = .18), 30-day (6.9% vs 6.6%, P = .90), or 1-year (20.6% versus 20.1%, P = .89) mortality. There was no significant difference in major cardiac complications. Average time from admission to operative treatment was 66.5 hours in the TTE group and 34.8 hours in the control group (P < .001). Average time from admission to medical clearance was 43.2 hours in the TTE group and 12.4 hours in the control group (P < .001). The TTE group also had a significantly longer length of stay (8.68 vs 6.44 days, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative TTE was not associated with lower mortality in elderly adults with hip fracture in the short- or long-term postoperative period. TTE was associated with delayed surgical treatment and longer length of stay and resulted in no cardiac intervention (e.g., cardiac catheterization, stent, stress test).

Dual small fragment plating improves screw-to-screw load sharing for mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture fixation: a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: A smaller humerus in some patients makes the use of a large fragment fixation plate difficult. Dual small fragment plate constructs have been suggested as an alternative. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the biomechanical performance of three single and one dual plate construct for mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture fixation. METHODS: Five humeral shaft finite element models (1 intact and 4 fixation) were loaded in torsion, compression, posterior-anterior (PA) bending, and lateral-medial (LM) bending. A comminuted fracture was simulated by a 1-cm gap. Fracture fixation was modelled by: (A) 4.5-mm 9-hole large fragment plate (wide), (B) 4.5-mm 9-hole large fragment plate (narrow), (C) 3.5-mm 9-hole small fragment plate, and (D) one 3.5-mm 9-hole small fragment plate and one 3.5-mm 7-hole small fragment plate. RESULTS: Model A showed the best outcomes in torsion and PA bending, whereas Model D outperformed the others in compression and LM bending. Stress concentrations were located near and around the unused screw holes for each of the single plate models and at the neck of the screws just below the plates for all the models studied. Other than in PA bending, Model D showed the best overall screw-to-screw load sharing characteristics. CONCLUSION: The results support using a dual small fragment locking plate construct as an alternative in cases where crutch weight-bearing (compression) tolerance may be important and where anatomy limits the size of the humerus bone segment available for large fragment plate fixation.

Dual plating of humeral shaft fractures: orthogonal plates biomechanically outperform side-by-side plates.

BACKGROUND: Single large-fragment plate constructs currently are the norm for internal fixation of middiaphyseal humerus fractures. In cases where humeral size is limited, however, dual small-fragment locking plate constructs may serve as an alternative. The mechanical effects of different possible plate configurations around the humeral diaphysis may be important, but to our knowledge, have yet to be investigated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We used finite element analysis to compare the simulated mechanical performance of five different dual small-fragment locking plate construct configurations for humeral middiaphyseal fracture fixation in terms of (1) stiffness, (2) stress shielding of bone, (3) hardware stresses, and (4) interfragmentary strain. METHODS: Middiaphyseal humeral fracture fixation was simulated using the finite element method. Three 90° and two side-by-side seven-hole and nine-hole small-fragment dual locking plate configurations were tested in compression, torsion, and combined loading. The configurations chosen are based on implantation using either a posterior or anterolateral approach. RESULTS: All three of the 90° configurations were more effective in restoring the intact compressive and torsional stiffness as compared with the side-by-side configurations, resulted in less stress shielding and stressed hardware, and showed interfragmentary strains between 5% to 10% in torsion and combined loading. CONCLUSIONS: The nine-hole plate anterior and seven-hole plate lateral (90° apart) configuration provided the best fixation. Our findings show the mechanical importance of plate placement with relation to loading in dual-plate fracture-fixation constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results presented provide novel biomechanical information for the orthopaedic surgeon considering different treatment options for middiaphyseal humeral fractures.

Current Practice in the Management of Open Fractures Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. Part A: Initial Management. A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Open fractures are one of the injuries with the highest rate of infection that orthopaedic trauma surgeons treat. The main purpose of this survey was to determine current practice and practice variation among Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members and make treatment recommendations based on previously published resources. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-nine orthopaedic trauma surgeons. METHODS: A 15-item questionnaire-based study titled "OTA Open Fracture Survey" was constructed. The survey was delivered to all OTA membership categories. Different components of the data charts were used to analyze numerous aspects of open fracture management, focusing on parameters of initial and definitive treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of participants responded that a period of time of less than 1 hour is the optimal time to antibiotic administration after identification of open fracture. Despite concerns with nephrotoxicity, 24.0%-76.3% of respondents reported the use of aminoglycosides in management of open fractures. A little over half of survey respondents continue antibiotics until next debridement in wounds that were not definitively closed after initial debridement and stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid administration of antibiotics in open fracture management is important. Aminoglycoside use is still prevalent despite evidence questioning efficacy and toxicity concerns. Time to debridement of open fractures is controversial among OTA members. Antibiotic administration is commonly continued >48 hours despite concerns raised by Surgical Infection Society and The Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma. Regarding study logistics, survey participation reminders should be used when conducting this type of study as it can increase data accrual by 50%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Current Practice in the Management of Open Fractures Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. Part B: Management of Segmental Long Bone Defects. A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of segmental long bone defects is one of the areas of substantial controversy in current orthopaedic trauma. The main purpose of this survey was to determine current practice and practice variation within the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) membership on this topic. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-nine orthopaedic trauma surgeons. METHODS: A 15-item questionnaire-based study titled "OTA Open Fracture Survey" was constructed. The survey was delivered to all OTA membership categories. Different components of the data charts were used to analyze various aspects of open fracture management, focusing on definitive treatment and materials used for grafting in "critical-sized" segmental bone defects. RESULTS: Between July and August 2012, a total of 379/1545 members responded for a 25% response rate. Overall, 89.5% (339/379) of respondents use some sort of antibiotic cement spacer before bone grafting. It was found that 92% of respondents preferred to use some type of autograft at time of definitive grafting of segmental defects. When using a grafting technique, 88% said they used some type of antibiotic cement. Within that context, 60.1% said graft placement should be done at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be substantial variation in the timing of bone graft placement after soft tissue healing and the source and form of graft used. The use of antibiotic cement is common in segmental defects that require delayed bone grafting. Obtaining base-line practice characteristics on controversial topics will help provide a foundation for assessing research needs and, therefore, goals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adult trauma: getting through the night.

It is now recognized that the treatment of many orthopaedic injuries can be, and in many cases should be, deferred until a later date. For example, surgical repair of most fractures of the proximal and distal tibia is now delayed until soft-tissue healing has occurred. Acute treatment involves only provisionally reducing and stabilizing such fractures using a joint-spanning external fixator. However, situations occur in the emergency department in which emergency treatment, even if it is just temporizing in nature, must be done immediately. Often, such treatment is outside the comfort zone of the responsible orthopaedic surgeon, even physicians with training and experience in orthopaedic trauma. Orthopaedic surgeons will benefit from updated information on current methods for the emergency management of limb- and/or life-threatening injuries in adults. Such treatment is often provisional in nature, treating only the urgent component of the injury (such as a compartment syndrome associated with a complex tibial plateau fracture). It is important for orthopaedic surgeons to understand how to get "through the night" so that later appropriate definitive care is facilitated to optimize patient outcomes.

Plating of the distal radius.

Distal radius fractures are common injuries that can be treated by a variety of methods. Restoration of the distal radius anatomy within established guidelines yields the best short- and long-term results. Guidelines for acceptable reduction are (1) radial shortening < 5 mm, (2) radial inclination > 15 degrees , (3) sagittal tilt on lateral projection between 15 degrees dorsal tilt and 20 degrees volar tilt, (4) intra-articular step-off < 2 mm of the radiocarpal joint, and (5) articular incongruity < 2 mm of the sigmoid notch of the distal radius. Treatment options range from closed reduction and immobilization to open reduction with plates and screws; options are differentiated based on their ability to reinforce and stabilize the three columns of the distal radius and ulna. Plating allows direct restoration of the anatomy, stable internal fixation, a decreased period of immobilization, and early return of wrist function. Buttress plates reduce and stabilize vertical shear intra-articular fractures through an antiglide effect, where-as conventional and locking plates address metaphyseal comminution and/or preserve articular congruity/reduction. With conventional and locking plates, intra-articular fractures are directly reduced; with buttress plates, the plate itself helps reduce the intra-articular fracture. Complications associated with plating include tendon irritation or rupture and the need for plate removal.