ABSTRACT
The emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum (P.f) drug resistance is still a major concern in Sub-Saharan Africa and warrants that its evolution be monitored continuously. The present study aimed at determining the distribution of key P.f drug resistance-mediating alleles in circulating malaria parasites in the West region of Cameroon. A cross sectional hospital-based study was conducted in Dschang and Ngounso in the West region of Cameroon. The Pfcrt, Pfmdr1, and the Pfdhps genes were amplified through nested PCR in 208 malaria-infected samples of the 301 febrile outpatients enrolled. The presence or absence of mutations in the K76T, N86Y, A437G and A581G codons of these P.f. genes respectively were determined through restriction digestion analysis. The proportion of different alleles were estimated as percentages and compared between two study sites using the Chi square test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. A high prevalence (75.6%) of the 437G allele was observed. It was significantly different between Dschang and Ngounso (62% vs. 89.2%, X2 = 19.6, P = 0.00005). Equally observed was a 19.2% (95%CI: 13.3-25.6) of the dhps-581G mutant allele. Furthermore, we observed the Pfcrt-76T, Pfmdr1-N86 mutations in 73.0% (67.5-79.7) and 87.2% (83.2-91.9), and 3.0% (0.0-9.6) and 12.8% was observed for the Pfcrt-K76T and Pfmdr1-N86Y respectively. When biallelic haplotypes were constructed from alleles of the three genes, same pattern was seen. Overall, 73% and 87% of circulating P. falciparum isolates carried wild type alleles at Pfmdr1-N86Y and Pfcrt-K76T. On the other hand, we found more parasites with mutant alleles at dhps (437G and 581G) loci which may reflect possible drug-related selection of this mutant in the parasite population. Continuous monitoring of these mutations is recommended to pre-empt a loss in sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine efficacy in malaria chemoprevention programs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported high efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when administered under direct observation in Cameroon. There is paucity of data to support their continuous use in home-based treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cameroon. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of AS-AQ versus AL for home-based treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria among children 6-120 months in Yaoundé, Cameroon. METHODS: A two-arm, open-label, randomized, controlled trial comparing the equivalence of AS-AQ (experimental group) and AL (control group) was carried out from May 2019 to April 2020 at two secondary hospitals in Yaoundé. Participants were randomized to receive either AS-AQ or AL. After the first dose, antimalarial drugs were given at home, rather than under direct observation by a study staff. The conventional on-treatment and post-treatment laboratory and clinical evaluations were not done until day 3 of the full antimalarial treatment course. The evaluation of effectiveness was mainly based on per protocol polymerase chain reaction adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response (PP PCR adjusted ACPR) on day 28 post-treatment. Safety was based on assessment of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs) from day 1 to day 28. RESULTS: A total of 242 children were randomized to receive AS-AQ (n = 114) and AL (n = 128). The PP PCR adjusted day 28 cure rates were [AS-AQ = 96.9% (95% CI, 91.2-99.4) versus AL = 95.5% (95% CI, 89.9-98.5), P = 0.797]. Expected mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both arms [AS-AQ = 83 (84.7%) versus AL = 99 (86.1%), P = 0.774]. The most common adverse events included: transient changes of hematologic indices and fever. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that AS-AQ and AL are effective and safe for home management of malaria in Yaoundé. The evidence from this study supports the parallel use of the two drugs in routine practice. However, the findings from this study do not describe the likely duration of antimalarial effectiveness in holoendemic areas where multiple courses of treatment might be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a randomized controlled trial and it was retrospectively registered on 23/09/2020 at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04565184.
