Open versus Single- or Dual-Portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Compared to the traditional open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), the additional safety and efficacy benefits of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of ECTR versus conventional OCTR as well as determine if a difference exists between the 2 most common endoscopic techniques: the single-portal and the dual-portal endoscopic technique. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, PubMed, and the CENTRAL. Additional articles were identified by handsearching reference lists. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes of ECTR with OCTR technique. Outcomes assessed included length of surgery, patient reported symptom and functional measures, time to return to work, and complications. A sub-group analysis was performed to indirectly compare single- versus dual-portal endoscopic approaches. Statistical analysis was performed via a random-effects model using Review Manager 5 Software. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 23 studies revealed a significantly higher incidence of transient postoperative nerve injury with ECTR, regardless of the number of portals, as compared with OCTR, although overall complication and re-operation rates were equivalent. Scar tenderness was significantly diminished with dual-portal endoscopic release when compared to single-portal and open methods. The rates of pillar pain, symptom relief, and patient reported satisfaction did not differ significantly between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although endoscopic surgery may be appealing in terms of reduced postoperative morbidity and a faster return to work for patients, surgeons should be mindful of the associated learning curve and higher incidence of transient nerve injury. Further study is required to identify if an advantage exists between different endoscopic techniques.

Rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of current evidence.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder pathology with an increasing incidence. The optimum post-operative rehab protocol remains unclear and can consist of either conservative rehabilitation or more aggressive early range-of-motion. Multiple studies have assessed these treatment protocols. This meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative clinical outcomes following either conservative or aggressive rehabilitation post rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search was undertaken using a number of databases. Eligible studies included randomized control trials published between January 2013 and April 2019 in English with patients having had received rotator cuff repair. Post-operative clinical outcomes considered included shoulder range-of-motion, overall function status (Costant-Murley score) and rates of rotator-cuff re-tear. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality in accordance with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Summarized pooled statistics were calculated using Review Manager (v5.3) software. RESULTS: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in shoulder flexion, abduction and external rotation was not statistically significant at either 6 or 12 months post rotator cuff repair. Functional assessment suggests a slight benefit in Constant-Murley Score (SMD = 1.77; 95% CI -3.93, 7.47) in aggressive treatment groups with no significant risk increase for cuff re-tear (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 0.60, 2.47). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests there is no clear benefit of either rehabilitation protocol when considering range-of-motion, with a possible benefit in functional outcome at the cost of increased re-tear risk post aggressive rehabilitation. Both protocols have been shown to offer safe reproducible short- and long-term outcomes.

Dedicated hip fracture services: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures (HFs) are common and pose a significant burden to both the individual and the community. Prompt operative management and aggressive rehabilitation have been shown to improve outcomes. However, there is often a delay in treatment due to lack of theatre availability and appropriate perioperative multi-disciplinary care. This study reviews the literature and reports on outcomes of HFs treated in dedicated units with allocated theatre time and pre-determined multi-disciplinary perioperative pathways. It also provides comparison against outcomes data from HF registries, both domestically and internationally. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed to identify original, English language studies reporting on patient outcomes from dedicated HF units (HFUs). Studies were graded using the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery criteria. Data were extracted from the text, table and figures of the selected studies. RESULTS: Five appropriate studies, with a total cohort of 6633 patients (4032 of whom were treated in a dedicated HFU), were identified. Patients treated in these units sustained a lower mortality rate (Risk Ratio  = 0.62, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that centres with dedicated HFUs result in improved 30-day mortality. Further research may demonstrate more sustained improvements in outcomes. The implementation of dedicated HFUs within health systems should be considered.

Tibial tunnel defect size as a risk factor in growth arrest following paediatric transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomical study.

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing controversy regarding growth disturbances in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Animal models have shown that an injury of 7-9% of the physeal area is a risk factor for growth disturbances. METHODS: A total of 39 magnetic resonance imaging studies of the knee were examined. The proximal tibial physeal area was determined using a calibrated 'region of interest' ligature encompassing the tibial physis in the axial plane. The potential defect left by commonly used drill sizes was calculated as a percentage of the physeal area. RESULTS: A 7-mm drill leaves a mean defect of 1.45% physeal area (range: 1.11-1.89%, SD: 0.28, 95% CI: ±0.09), 8-mm drill leaves a 1.84% mean defect (range: 1.43-2.49%, SD: 0.38, 95% CI: ±0.12) and a 9-mm drill leaves a 2.30% mean defect (range: 1.83-3.19%, SD: 0.58, 95% CI: ±0.17). At 55°, 7-mm drill leaves a mean defect of 1.96% (range: 1.32-2.28%, SD: 0.37, 95% CI: ±0.12), 8-mm drill leaves a mean defect of 2.19% (range: 1.71-2.95%, SD: 0.46, 95% CI: ±0.14) and a 9-mm drill leaves a mean defect of 2.76% (range: 2.16-3.73%, SD: 0.58, 95% CI: ±0.18). There was a statistically significant difference in the tunnel area with a change of drill angle (7-mm drill P = 0.005, 8-mm drill P = 0.001, 9-mm drill P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: On the basis of this study in the context of animal model and observational evidence, the area of physeal injury using drill tunnels for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction would not appear to contribute to potential growth disturbances.

The diagnostic accuracy of Böhler's angle in fractures of the calcaneus.

BACKGROUND: Böhler's historical tuber-joint angle of the calcaneus has been used since 1931. Surprisingly, there is a paucity of literature on its use. OBJECTIVES: To confirm the normal range for Böhler's angle and determine the angle with the highest accuracy in the diagnosis of calcaneal fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study cohort comprised 424 patients spanning a 5-year period from April 2005 to March 2010. Böhler's angle was measured by two independent observers on lateral x-ray study using the digital angle tool from the Picture Archival and Communication System. Data were analyzed using Stata 8 statistical software package. RESULTS: The mean Böhler's angle in patients without calcaneal fracture was 29.4°. In this group there was no difference in Böhler's angle between male and female patients, left and right feet, or across age. In those patients with calcaneal fractures, a Böhler's angle below 25° was moderately predictive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 82%), an angle below 23° was highly predictive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 89%), and an angle below 21° was strongly suggestive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 99%, specificity = 99%). A Böhler's angle of ≤ 20° had the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: A Böhler's angle of 20° or less is highly accurate in determining the presence or absence of calcaneal fracture. Böhler's angle serves as a useful screening tool in fracture diagnosis.