Air pollution and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk: a 7-year study from a highly polluted area.

AIMS: Globally, nearly 20% of cardiovascular disease deaths were attributable to air pollution. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) represents a major public health problem; therefore, the identification of novel OHCA triggers is of crucial relevance. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between air pollution (short-, mid-, and long-term exposures) and OHCA risk, during a 7-year period in a highly polluted urban area in northern Italy, with a high density of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were prospectively collected from the 'Progetto Vita Database' between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017; day-by-day air pollution levels were extracted from the Environmental Protection Agency stations. Electrocardiograms of OHCA interventions were collected from the AED data cards. Day-by-day particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and 10, ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels were measured. A total of 880 OHCAs occurred in 748 days. A significant increase in OHCA risk with a progressive increase in PM2.5, PM10, CO, and NO2 levels was found. After adjustment for temperature and seasons, a 9% and 12% increase in OHCA risk for each 10 µg/m3 increase in PM10 (P < 0.0001) and PM2.5 (P < 0.0001) levels was found. Air pollutant levels were associated with both asystole and shockable rhythm risk, while no correlation was found with pulseless electrical activity. CONCLUSION: Short- and mid-term exposures to PM2.5 and PM10 are independently associated with the risk of OHCA due to asystole or shockable rhythm.

Community-based automated external defibrillator only resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

BACKGROUND: Speed is the cornerstone of rescue for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. As a consequence, community participation programs have been initiated to decrease response times. Even in the very best of these programs, however, short-term survival rates hover around 10% and long-term survival rates are half that. In most locales, survival is far worse. In Piacenza, Italy, responders have been trained for more than a decade to use publicly available automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and eschew the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). It is known locally as "Progetto Vita." METHODS: From 2001 to 2014, we prospectively collected outcome data on all Progetto Vita-treated patients and all 3271 standard emergency medical services (EMS) patients. Progetto Vita rescuers simply accessed a public AED, turned it on, and only followed its instructions. Progetto Vita rescuers did not do CPR of any sort. If EMS arrived prior to initiation or even completion of the Progetto Vita protocol, EMS-supplanted Progetto Vita efforts and patients were not included in the Progetto Vita cohort. Follow-up was collected by each responder's data files, medical record review, and use of the Italian system death index. All cardiac arrest patients' death status was validated in 100% of patients through August 1, 2014. FINDINGS: Survival to hospital discharge occurred in 39 (41.4%) of the 95 patients treated by Progetto Vita and in 193 (5.9%) of the 3271 EMS patients. At 13-year follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were 31.8% when AEDs only were used and 2.4% for standard EMS/CPR response. Estimates of survival are significantly better for Progetto Vita AED-only therapy when survival was stratified by time to respond, gender, location of cardiac arrest, and shockable rhythm. Relative to the 95 EMS patients with the fastest response times, Progetto Vita intervention was associated with a more than 2-fold increased rate of survival. INTERPRETATION: This is the first demonstration of excellent long-term survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by promoting speed and ease of lay AED response without CPR.