Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation in humans.

With recent advances in methods of islet isolation and the introduction of more potent and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive therapies, islet transplantation has progressed from research to clinical reality. Presently, several international centres have demonstrated successful clinical outcomes with high rates of insulin independence after islet transplantation. Ongoing refinements in donor pancreas procurement and processing, developments in islet isolation and purification technology, and advances in novel immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to the acceptance of islet transplantation as a safe and effective therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. This review provides a historical perspective of islet transplantation, outlines the recent advances and current clinical outcomes, and addresses the present challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation.

Costimulation blockade of both inducible costimulator and CD40 ligand induces dominant tolerance to islet allografts and prevents spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse.

Costimulation blockade is a promising strategy for preventing allograft rejection and inducing tolerance. Using a fully allogeneic mouse model, we tested the effectiveness of the combined blockade of the CD40 ligand and the inducible costimulator (ICOS) on islet allograft survival and in the prevention of autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse. Recipients treated with blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to ICOS and the CD40 ligand had significant prolongation of graft survival, with 26 of 28 functioning for >200 days. Long-term engrafted mice maintained antidonor proliferative and cytotoxic responses, but donor-specific immunization did not induce graft rejection, and challenge with second, same donor but not third-party grafts resulted in long-term acceptance. The immunohistology of tolerant grafts demonstrated the presence of CD4(+)CD25(+) T-cells expressing Foxp3, and islet/kidney composite grafts from tolerant mice, but not from mice lacking lymphocytes, were accepted indefinitely when transplanted into naïve B6 mice, suggesting that recipient T-cells were necessary to generate dominant tolerance. Combined anti-ICOS and anti-CD40 ligand mAb therapy also prevented diabetes in NOD mice, with only 11% of treated recipients developing diabetes compared with 75% of controls. These data demonstrate that the blockade of CD40 ligand and ICOS signaling induces islet allograft tolerance involving a dominant mechanism associated with intragraft regulatory cells and prevents autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.

Robust tolerance to fully allogeneic islet transplants achieved by chimerism with minimal conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Whether mixed chimeras induced by nonmyeloablative conditioning are tolerant to challenge with donor allogeneic islet grafts is unknown. Here we investigate whether our nonmyeloablative, costimulation blockade-free and sirolimus (SRL)-based protocol could facilitate mixed chimerism via bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and induce islet allograft tolerance. METHODS: After low dose (1-3 Gy) total body irradiation (TBI, day -1), with or without prior lymphocyte depletion, C57BL/6 mice were transfused with 40 x 10(6) BALB/c bone marrow cells (day 0) and received SRL (3 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks. Chimerism was monitored by flow cytometry and the recipients were rendered diabetic chemically and challenged with donor islets. RESULTS: Mixed chimerism was achieved in mice treated with TBI 3 Gy/SRL but it declined over time in 60% (9/15) of them. Long-term stable chimerism was established in 100% of recipients over 50 weeks with either antilymphocyte serum (ALS, 9/9), anti-CD4 (4/4), or anti-CD4 plus anti-CD8 (5/5) prior to BMT. TBI conditioning could be reduced to 1 Gy, with 90% (9/10) maintaining chimerism in the long-term. When TBI was substituted with cyclophosphamide (CTX) or busulfan (BUS), all mice remained chimeric in the long-term. The chimeras showed no proliferative response to donor antigen and accepted both first and second donor-specific islet grafts indefinitely while rejecting third-party grafts. CONCLUSIONS: This data provides the first evidence that stable fully allogeneic chimeras induced with BMT after nonmyeloablative conditioning with SRL and lymphocyte-depleting antibodies exhibit robust donor-specific tolerance to islet grafts.

Islet transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: choice of immunosuppression.

Islet transplantation offers patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus freedom from long-term insulin therapy and a degree of metabolic control that is far superior to injected insulin. The hope is that near-perfect glucose control sustained over time will prevent progression of secondary diabetic complications. The selection of optimal immunosuppressive agents for islet transplantation has been a formidable challenge, given the need to overcome both autoimmune and alloimmune barriers, as well as the potential toxicity of immunosuppressive agents on transplanted islets. Early strategies relied on protocols that had proven success in solid organ transplantation and consisted of azathioprine, cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Under these protocols, fewer than 10% of patients were able to achieve insulin independence. The development of the 'Edmonton Protocol' dramatically transformed clinical outcomes in islet transplantation in recent years through the introduction of a more potent, less diabetogenic, and corticosteroid-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of sirolimus, low-dose tacrolimus, and induction anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody. While insulin independence rates under this protocol have been highly successful, patients must be maintained on lifelong immunosuppression. While the risk of malignancy, post-transplant lymphoma and sepsis have been low and diminishing in transplanted patients to date, fears of these complications and a host of drug-related adverse effects have precluded broader application. Patients undergoing islet transplantation today must exchange insulin for chronic immunosuppressive therapy, and therefore the procedure can only be justified in patients with very unstable forms of diabetes, or in those with another solid organ allograft who already endure the risks of immunosuppression. Advances in more specific and less toxic immunosuppressive agents together with progress in better understanding the biology of diabetes will lead to more suitable strategies to control both alloimmune and recurrent autoimmune reactions. These protocols, ultimately aimed at establishing tolerance, are an essential pre-requisite to move towards providing islet transplantation earlier in the course of the disease, including transplantation in children. This review addresses the evolution of immunosuppressive strategies in islet transplantation, and highlights some novel agents in pre-clinical development or in early clinical trials that may offer considerable promise in facilitating the induction of tolerance.

Multiple combination therapies involving blockade of ICOS/B7RP-1 costimulation facilitate long-term islet allograft survival.

In recent years a series of novel costimulatory molecules have been identified, including inducible costimulator (ICOS). In a fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched mouse model of islet transplantation, we demonstrate that while monotherapy with CTLA4-Ig, CD40 ligand monoclonal antibody (CD40L mAb) or rapamycin each improves islet allograft survival, graft rejection eventually develops. Immunohistologic analysis of rejected grafts revealed increased ICOS expression, suggesting a role for this costimulatory molecule as an alternate pathway for T-cell activation. The combination of a blocking anti-ICOS mAb with each of the above therapies resulted in significantly improved islet allograft survival, confirming the importance of ICOS signaling in islet allograft rejection. Mechanistic studies conducted in mice treated with anti-ICOS mAb and rapamycin demonstrated a lack of donor-specific immunological tolerance and an absence of regulatory T-cell activity. However, a dramatic effect was seen on acute anti-donor responses whereby anti-ICOS mAb and rapamycin significantly reduced the initial expansion and function of alloreactive T cells. These data demonstrate that blockade of the ICOS/B7RP-1 pathway has potential therapeutic benefit given its role in enhancing islet allograft survival and regulating acute alloresponses in vivo.

Clinical islet transplant: current and future directions towards tolerance.

The ultimate goal of islet transplantation is to completely correct the diabetic state from an unlimited donor source, without the need for chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy. Although islet transplantation provides an opportunity to develop innovative strategies for tolerance in the clinic, both alloimmune and autoimmune barriers must be controlled, if stable graft function is to be maintained long-term. After islet extraction from the pancreas, the cellular graft may be stored in tissue culture or cryopreserved for banking, providing an opportunity not only to optimally condition the recipient but also to allow in vitro immunologic manipulation of the graft before transplantation, unlike solid organ grafts. As such, islets may be considered a "special case." Remarkable progress has occurred in the last three years, with dramatic improvements in outcomes after clinical islet transplantation. The introduction of a steroid-free, sirolimus-based, anti-rejection protocol and islets prepared from two (or rarely three) donors led to high rates of insulin independence. The "Edmonton Protocol" has been successfully replicated by other centers in an international multicenter trial. A number of key refinements in pancreas transportation, processing, purification on non-ficoll-based media, storage of islets in culture for two days and newer immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to continued advancement through extensive collaboration between key centers. This review outlines the historical development of islet transplantation over the past 30 years, provides an update on current clinical outcomes, and summarizes a series of unique opportunities for development and early testing of tolerance protocols in patients.