Effects of metformin on adipose-derived stromal cell (ADSC) - Breast cancer cell lines interaction.

AIMS: Metformin is a clinical drug administered to patients to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus that was found to be associated with a lower risk of occurrence of cancer and cancer-related death. The present study investigated the effects of metformin on human adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSC) - breast cancer cell line interactions. MAIN METHODS: ADSCs grown from lipoaspirates were tested for growth-stimulating and migration-controlling activity on breast cancer cell lines after pretreatment with metformin. Furthermore, secreted proteins of ADSCs, phosphorylation of intracellular proteins and the effect of metformin on adipocytic differentiation of ADSCs were assayed. KEY FINDINGS: Compared to breast cancer cell lines (4.0 ± 3.5% reduction of proliferation), 2 mM metformin significantly inhibited the proliferation of ADSC lines (19.2 ± 8.4% reduction of proliferation). This effect on ADSCs seems to be mediated by altered phosphorylation of GSK-3, CREB and PRAS40. Furthermore, treatment with metformin abolished the induction of differentiation of three ADSC lines to adipocytes. 1 and 2 mM metformin significantly impaired the migration of breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 in scratch assays. SIGNIFICANCE: Metformin showed low direct inhibitory effects on breast cancer cell lines at physiological concentrations but exerted a significant retardation of the growth and the adipocytic differentiation of ADSCs. Thus, the anticancer activity of metformin in breast cancer at physiological drug concentrations seems to be mediated by an indirect mechanism that lowers the supportive activity of ADSCs.

Collagen- versus gelatine-coated Dacron versus stretch PTFE bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: long-term results of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective randomized multicenter trial, knitted gelatine-coated Dacron, knitted collagen-coated Dacron, and stretch polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) aortic bifurcation grafts were compared for their long-term results. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, 149 patients undergoing elective revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease were prospectively randomized at 3 tertiary referral centers of vascular surgery. The patients received either gelatine-coated Dacron (GEL-D) grafts (n = 52), collagen-coated Dacron (COL-D) grafts (n = 49), or stretch PTFE grafts (n = 48). RESULTS: No intraoperative deaths were recorded. The 30-day mortality was 4%. The mean follow-up time was 97 months. Primary patency rates were 77% for GEL-D, 78% for COL-D, and 79% for PTFE at 8 years. The differences were not different (P >.8). Secondary corrected 8-year patency rates were also not significantly different (P >.5): 91% for GEL-D, 96% for COL-Dm and 90% for PTFE. Five Dacron and 1 PTFE grafts were affected by infections. CONCLUSIONS: Bifurcation grafts for revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive disease using these 3 materials were comparable in terms of primary and secondary patency and long-term complication rates.

Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical operation in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management (TEAM) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is widely performed, open graft replacement is still considered the standard of care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether clear indications for TEAM can be established in patients with significant comorbidities without investigating differences in relative procedure efficacy or durability. METHODS AND RESULTS: A propensity score-based analysis of 454 consecutive patients treated electively for AAA from January 1995 through December 2000 was performed. Of those 454 patients, 248 received open surgery and 206 received TEAM. In-hospital mortality rates (MRs) were compared. After adjusting for propensity scores, a Cox proportional hazard model (COX) was employed to test the influence of the respective treatment on postoperative 900-day survival estimates (SEs). Several potential preoperative risk factors were used as covariates. The MR of all patients was 3.7%. Explorative analysis demonstrated that patients treated by TEAM presented with significantly more risk factors. In American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV patients, a significant difference in MR was detected (4.7% for TEAM versus 19.2% for open surgery; P<0.02). After adjusting for the propensity to receive TEAM or open surgery, a regression analysis of survival based on COX revealed predictive influences of impaired kidney (P<0.047) or pulmonary function (P<0.001), increased age (P<0.05), and selection of treatment modality (P<0.002) on SE. CONCLUSIONS: TEAM represents a less invasive procedure for AAA therapy in patients with significant preoperative risk factors. Especially in geriatric patients with multiple morbidities, TEAM offers a method of therapy with acceptable MRs and SEs, making active treatment possible in otherwise incurable patients.