Contribution of astrocytic histamine N-methyltransferase to histamine clearance and brain function in mice.

Brain histamine acts as a neurotransmitter in the regulation of various brain activities. Previous studies have shown that histamine N-methyltransferase (HNMT), a histamine-metabolizing enzyme, controls brain histamine concentration and brain function. However, the relative contribution of astrocytic or neuronal HNMT to the regulation of the histaminergic system is still inconclusive. Here, we phenotyped astrocytes-specific HNMT knockout (cKO) mice to clarify the involvement of astrocytic HNMT in histamine clearance and brain function. First, we performed histological examinations using HNMT reporter mice and showed a wide distribution of HNMT in the brain and astrocytic HNMT expression. Then, we created cKO mice by Cre-loxP system and confirmed that HNMT expression in cKO primary astrocytes was robustly decreased. Although total HNMT level in the cortex was not substantially different between control and cKO brains, histamine concentration after histamine release was elevated in cKO cortex. In behavioral tests, impaired motor coordination and lower locomotor activity were observed in the cKO mice. However, anxiety-like behaviors, depression-like behaviors, and memory functions were not altered by astrocytic HNMT disruption. Although sleep analysis demonstrated that the quantity of wakefulness and sleep did not change, the increased power density of delta frequency during wakefulness indicated lower cortical activation in cKO mice. These results demonstrate that astrocytic HNMT contributes to histamine clearance after histamine release in the cortex and plays a role in the regulation of motor coordination, locomotor activity, and vigilance state.

NMDA and AMPA receptors contribute to the maintenance of substance P-induced thermal hyperalgesia.

It is well known that intrathecal administration of substance P (SP) induces thermal hyperalgesia, but the mechanisms underlying the maintenance of SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia remain to be clarified. Thus, to clarify the receptors involved in the maintenance of SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia, the effect of administering SP or glutamate receptor agonists, NMDA or AMPA, under SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia was investigated. Also, the effect of pretreatment with protein kinase inhibitors on scratching behavior by NMDA or AMPA under SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia was examined. Under SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia, the number of scratchings following SP administration was time-dependently suppressed, whereas the number of scratchings after NMDA or AMPA administration was markedly enhanced and SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia was attenuated by pretreatment with NMDA or AMPA receptor antagonist. Furthermore, pretreatment with kinase inhibitors significantly attenuated the enhancement of scratching behavior by NMDA or AMPA under SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia. These findings indicate that SP-induced thermal hyperalgesia may be maintained through the enhanced responsiveness of NMDA or AMPA receptors, but not the receptor of SP, mediated by kinases.

Effect of the carboxyl-terminal of endokinins on SP-induced pain-related behavior.

The preprotachykinin C gene encodes four endokinins, A, B, C, and D. Endokinins A and B and substance P (SP) are typical tachykinin peptides since their carboxyl-terminal regions share an F-F-G-L-M-amide, while endokinins C and D share an F-Q-G-L-L-amide. It is demonstrated that pretreatment with a peptide consisting of a common sequence between endokinins C and D (EKC/D) attenuates the induction of scratching behavior and thermal hyperalgesia by intrathecal administration of SP or EKA/B (the carboxyl-terminal dacapeptide common in endokinins A and B), suggesting that leucine at the carboxyl-terminal of EKC/D may have a crucial role in eliciting these effects. When the effect of [Leu(11)]-SP and [Leu(10)]-EKA/B on SP-induced pain-related behavior was examined, the induction of pain-related behavior was markedly attenuated by pretreatment with these peptides. This indicates that leucine at the carboxyl-terminal of these peptides plays a crucial role in eliciting this antagonistic effect.

Effects of intrathecal administration of newer antidepressants on mechanical allodynia in rat models of neuropathic pain.

Antidepressants, especially tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are widely used for the treatment of various types of chronic and neuropathic pain. The antinociceptive effects of TCAs are, however, complicated. Therefore, two kinds of newer antidepressants whose functions have been more fully clarified were selected, milnacipran, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and paroxetine and fluvoxamine, which are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The antiallodynic effects of intrathecal administration of these newer antidepressants were examined in two rat models of neuropathic pain, chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic neuropathy. The antiallodynic effect of these antidepressants was evaluated using the von Frey test. The intrathecal administration of milnacipran had an antiallodynic effect in both CCI and STZ-induced diabetic rats in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, the intrathecal administration of either paroxetine or fluvoxamine elicited little antiallodynic effect in CCI rats, while both SSRIs had antiallodynic effects in the STZ-induced diabetic rats in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicate a considerable difference to exist in the development and/or maintenance between these two animal models of neuropathic pain and suggest that each of these three antidepressants may be effective for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain.

Leucine at the carboxyl-terminal of endokinins C and D contributes to elicitation of the antagonistic effect on substance P in rat pain processing.

Endokinins are tachykinin peptides designated from a human preprotachykinin C (PPT-C, TAC4) gene and consist of endokinin A (EKA), endokinin B (EKB), endokinin C (EKC) and endokinin D (EKD). A representative of mammalian tachykinins is substance P (SP), which functions as a neurotransmitter or modulator in the pain system; however, little is known about the role of these endokinins, especially EKC and EKD, in pain processing. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of EKC/D (using the common carboxyl-terminal duodecapeptide in EKC and EKD) on pain processing in rats. Pretreatment with EKC/D prevented induction of scratching behavior and thermal hyperalgesia by intrathecal administration of EKA/B (using the common C-terminal decapeptide in EKA and EKB) and SP and c-Fos expression in laminae I/II and V/VI of the spinal cord by noxious thermal stimulation. A prominent difference between EKC/D and SP is the presence of leucine instead of methionine at the carboxyl-terminal of EKC/D. Thus, to clarify whether leucine at the carboxyl-terminal of EKC/D plays an important role in determining the inhibitory effect of this peptide, we intrathecally administered [Met(12)]-EKC/D in which only leucine of EKC/D is replaced by methionine. This peptide did not exhibit the inhibitory effect on SP-induced scratching behavior or thermal hyperalgesia but conversely caused thermal hyperalgesia. Taken together, these findings indicate that EKC/D has an inhibitory effect on pain processing in the rat spinal cord, and the effect is due to leucine at the carboxyl-terminal of EKC/D.

The common carboxyl-terminal region of novel tachykinin peptides contributes to induce desensitization in scratching behavior of rats.

Some novel tachykinin peptides exhibiting homology with known members of the tachykinin family have been recently reported; however, little is known about the function of these peptides. Repeated intrathecal administration of substance P (SP) causes desensitization by binding SP to neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor. Thus, to clarify the characteristics of the receptors involved in these novel peptides, we investigated whether desensitization is induced by intrathecal administration of these peptides in rats since desensitization is induced by binding these peptides to the receptor. Intrathecal administration of 10(-3) M hemokinin-1 (HK-1) and 10(-3) M decapeptide common in the carboxyl-terminal region of endokinin A and endokinin B (EKA/B) as well as SP evoked scratching behavior. When each peptide was administered twice with an interval of 15 min, remarkable desensitization of scratching behavior was produced. Furthermore, the first administration of EKA/B or SP produced clear cross-desensitization to SP, EKA/B and HK-1, whereas the first administration of HK-1 demonstrated weak cross-desensitization to EKA/B and SP. These results suggest that EKA/B and SP may bind to both the NK1 receptor and HK-1-preferred receptor, and HK-1 may preferentially bind to its preferred receptor.

Intrathecal administration of the common carboxyl-terminal decapeptide in endokinin A and endokinin B evokes scratching behavior and thermal hyperalgesia in the rat.

Endokinins are novel mammalian tachykinin peptides designated from a human preprotachykinin gene and consist of endokinin A (EKA), endokinin B (EKB), endokinin C (EKC) and endokinin D (EKD). A representative of the tachykinin peptide is substance P (SP), which functions as a pain modulator or transmitter and contributes to pain processing; however, little is known about the function of endokinins in pain processing. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of EKA/B (using the common C-terminal decapeptide in EKA and EKB) and EKC/D (using the common C-terminal duodecapeptide in EKC and EKD) on pain processing in rats. Intrathecal administration of 10(-3) M (10 nmol) EKA/B evoked pain-related behavior such as scratching while 10(-3) M EKC/D administration did not. This induction of scratching behavior following EKA/B administration was suppressed by pretreatment with an NK1 receptor antagonist. In addition to the induction of scratching behavior, intrathecal administration of 10(-7) - 10(-4) M (1 pmol-1 nmol) EKA/B decreased the latency of the paw withdrawal response to noxious thermal stimulation, whereas there was little effect of EKC/D administration on the latency of the withdrawal response. This effect of EKA/B was also suppressed by pretreatment with NK1 receptor antagonists. These results indicate that intrathecal administration of EKA/B but not EKC/D evokes scratching behavior and thermal hyperalgesia through the NK1 receptor.