ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychosis treatment guidelines recommend cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and family intervention (FI), for all patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), though guidance borrows heavily from literature in adults from high income countries. To our knowledge, there are few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the comparative effect of these commonly endorsed psychosocial interventions in individuals with early psychosis from high-income countries and no such trials from low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The present study aims to confirm the clinical-efficacy and cost-effectiveness of delivering culturally adapted CBT (CaCBT) and culturally adapted FI (CulFI) to individuals with FEP in Pakistan. METHOD: A multi-centre, three-arm RCT of CaCBT, CulFI, and treatment as usual (TAU) for individuals with FEP (n = 390), recruited from major centres across Pakistan. Reducing overall symptoms of FEP will be the primary outcome. Additional aims will include improving patient and carer outcomes and estimating the economic impact of delivering culturally appropriate psychosocial interventions in low-resource settings. This trial will assess the clinical-efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CaCBT and CulFI compared with TAU in improving patient (positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, general psychopathology, depressive symptoms, quality of life, cognition, general functioning, and insight) and carer related outcomes (carer experience, wellbeing, illness attitudes and symptoms of depression and anxiety). CONCLUSIONS: A successful trial may inform the rapid scale up of these interventions not only in Pakistan but other low-resource settings, to improve clinical outcomes, social and occupational functioning, and quality of life in South Asian and other minority groups with FEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05814913.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , Humans , Psychosocial Intervention , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Anxiety , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) ventilation perfusion (V/Q) scanning with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an emerging imaging technique for investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to estimate diagnostic utility of the combined technique using results from all patients referred in 2009 compared with final diagnosis and 6-month follow-up status. PE was diagnosed in 28 of 106 patients (26%), including in 2 of 80 (2%) with negative SPECT V/Q and LDCT. The estimated negative predictive value of SPECT V/Q for PE was 97%. LDCT was abnormal in 43 (41%) patients, including 41 patients who had negative SPECT V/Q. In 29 (27%) patients, LDCT provided information on alternative pathologies that accounted for presenting symptoms, and the combined technique had a diagnostic yield of 52%.
Subject(s)
Multimodal Imaging/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Consensus , Creatinine/blood , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Embolism/blood , Pulmonary Embolism/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Symptom AssessmentABSTRACT
This study assessed the knowledge and management of common psychiatric disorders by general practitioners (GPs) in Karachi, Pakistan. Structured interviews were carried out in 2009 with 360 GPs selected by cluster random sampling. Patients with psychiatric disorders were estimated to be up to 10% of the daily caseload according to 71.8% of doctors. Two-thirds of GPs were unaware of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression and anxiety disorders. Benzodiazepines were the most recognized category of medication (75.3%) and were the most commonly used medication for all mental health conditions. Fewer GPs were familiar with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (35.1%) or tricyclic antidepressants (20.2%). Lack of time and patients' financial constraints were reported to be barriers to care. Most GPs (69.2%) had not received any recent medical education about mental health problems. Gaps in GPs' knowledge about the management of mental disorders have implications for the rational use of psychotropic medications in primary care.
Subject(s)
General Practice , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mental Disorders/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adult , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Drug Utilization , Female , General Practice/education , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Pakistan , Psychotropic DrugsABSTRACT
This study assessed the knowledge and management of common psychiatric disorders by general practitioners [GPs] in Karachi, Pakistan, Structured interviews were carried out in 2009 with 360 GPs selected by cluster random sampling. Patients with psychiatric disorders were estimated to be up to 10% of the daily caseload according to 71.8% of doctors. Two-thirds of GPs were unaware of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression and anxiety disorders. Benzodiazepines were the most recognized category of medication [75.3%] and were the most commonly used medication for all mental health conditions. Fewer GPs were familiar with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [35.1%] or tricyclic antidepressants [20.2%]. Lack of time and patients financial constraints were reported to be barriers to care. Most GPs [69.2%] had not received any recent medical education about mental health problems. Gaps in GPs' knowledge about the management of mental disorders have implications for the rational use of psychotropic medications in primary care
