Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Affect Disord ; 46(3): 191-217, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9547117

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in depressed elderly patients. METHODS: Search for randomized controlled double-blind studies evaluating atypical antidepressants (ATYPs), reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants in moderate/severe depressed patients > or = 60 years for > or = four weeks. The random effects model (single-arm; comparative) was used to aggregate efficacy, safety and dropout. RESULTS: No difference in single-arm aggregation of outcomes for four antidepressant classes. Comparative analyses showed no statistical difference between outcomes, except SSRIs had a higher response rate than ATYPs. CONCLUSION: Elderly show no differences in antidepressant class outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity and lack of power. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is little advantage for antidepressant classes over another in the aged.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Patient Dropouts , Placebos , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...