Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 815, 2018 01 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29339751

ABSTRACT

Jumonji (JmjC) domain proteins are known regulators of gene expression and chromatin organization by way of histone demethylation. Chromatin modification and remodeling provides a means to modulate the activity of large numbers of genes, but the importance of this class of predicted histone-modifying enzymes for different aspects of post-developmental processes remains poorly understood. Here we test the function of all 11 non-lethal members in the regulation of circadian rhythms and sleep. We find loss of every Drosophila JmjC gene affects different aspects of circadian behavior and sleep in a specific manner. Together these findings suggest that the majority of JmjC proteins function as regulators of behavior, rather than controlling essential developmental programs.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm , Drosophila/physiology , Epigenesis, Genetic , Jumonji Domain-Containing Histone Demethylases/metabolism , Sleep , Animals , Histones/metabolism , Protein Processing, Post-Translational
2.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 41(6): 1439-46, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26576740

ABSTRACT

Neuropsychiatric disorders are of complex etiology, often including a large genetic component. In order to help identify and study the molecular and physiological mechanisms that such genes participate in, numerous animal models have been established in a variety of species. Over the past decade, this has increasingly included the vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we outline why we study an invertebrate organism in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders, and we discuss how we can gain insight from studies in Drosophila. We focus on a few disorders and findings to make the larger point that modeling these diseases in flies can have both mechanistic and predictive validity. Highlighting some translational examples, we underline the fact that their brains works more like ours than one would have anticipated.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Drosophila melanogaster , Neuropharmacology/methods , Animals , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Autism Spectrum Disorder/physiopathology , Biomedical Research/methods , Brain/drug effects , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Diseases/drug therapy , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Fragile X Syndrome/drug therapy , Fragile X Syndrome/physiopathology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychopharmacology/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/physiopathology
3.
Dev Cell ; 29(6): 701-15, 2014 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960694

ABSTRACT

The small GTPase Rac1 orchestrates actin-dependent remodeling essential for numerous cellular processes including synapse development. While precise spatiotemporal regulation of Rac1 is necessary for its function, little is known about the mechanisms that enable Rac1 activators (GEFs) and inhibitors (GAPs) to act in concert to regulate Rac1 signaling. Here, we identify a regulatory complex composed of a Rac-GEF (Tiam1) and a Rac-GAP (Bcr) that cooperate to control excitatory synapse development. Disruption of Bcr function within this complex increases Rac1 activity and dendritic spine remodeling, resulting in excessive synaptic growth that is rescued by Tiam1 inhibition. Notably, EphB receptors utilize the Tiam1-Bcr complex to control synaptogenesis. Following EphB activation, Tiam1 induces Rac1-dependent spine formation, whereas Bcr prevents Rac1-mediated receptor internalization, promoting spine growth over retraction. The finding that a Rac-specific GEF/GAP complex is required to maintain optimal levels of Rac1 signaling provides an important insight into the regulation of small GTPases.


Subject(s)
Dendritic Spines/physiology , GTPase-Activating Proteins/physiology , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr/physiology , Receptors, Eph Family/metabolism , Synapses/physiology , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , Animals , Blotting, Western , Electrophysiology , Endocytosis , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/genetics , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Immunoprecipitation , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Neurites/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Signal Transduction , T-Lymphoma Invasion and Metastasis-inducing Protein 1
4.
Mol Biol Cell ; 24(24): 3857-68, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24152735

ABSTRACT

Cell polarization is essential for many biological processes, including directed cell migration, and loss of polarity contributes to pathological conditions such as cancer. The Par complex (Par3, Par6, and PKCζ) controls cell polarity in part by recruiting the Rac-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1 (Tiam1) to specialized cellular sites, where Tiam1 promotes local Rac1 activation and cytoskeletal remodeling. However, the mechanisms that restrict Par-Tiam1 complex activity to the leading edge to maintain cell polarity during migration remain unclear. We identify the Rac-specific GTPase-activating protein (GAP) breakpoint cluster region protein (Bcr) as a novel regulator of the Par-Tiam1 complex. We show that Bcr interacts with members of the Par complex and inhibits both Rac1 and PKCζ signaling. Loss of Bcr results in faster, more random migration and striking polarity defects in astrocytes. These polarity defects are rescued by reducing PKCζ activity or by expressing full-length Bcr, but not an N-terminal deletion mutant or the homologous Rac-GAP, Abr, both of which fail to associate with the Par complex. These results demonstrate that Bcr is an integral member of the Par-Tiam1 complex that controls polarized cell migration by locally restricting both Rac1 and PKCζ function.


Subject(s)
Astrocytes/cytology , Cell Movement/genetics , Cell Polarity/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Animals , Astrocytes/metabolism , Cell Adhesion Molecules , Cell Cycle Proteins , Cell Polarity/physiology , Cells, Cultured , GTPase-Activating Proteins/metabolism , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Neuropeptides/antagonists & inhibitors , Neuropeptides/biosynthesis , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Protein Kinase C/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Kinase C/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr/metabolism , Signal Transduction , T-Lymphoma Invasion and Metastasis-inducing Protein 1 , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/biosynthesis , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism
5.
Mol Biol Cell ; 24(4): 474-82, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23283986

ABSTRACT

The malignant brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) displays invasive growth behaviors that are regulated by extracellular cues within the neural microenvironment. The adhesion and signaling pathways that drive GBM cell invasion remain largely uncharacterized. Here we use human GBM cell lines, primary patient samples, and preclinical mouse models to demonstrate that integrin αvß8 is a major driver of GBM cell invasion. ß8 integrin is overexpressed in many human GBM cells, with higher integrin expression correlating with increased invasion and diminished patient survival. Silencing ß8 integrin in human GBM cells leads to impaired tumor cell invasion due to hyperactivation of the Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42. ß8 integrin coimmunoprecipitates with Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor 1 (RhoGDI1), an intracellular signaling effector that sequesters Rho GTPases in their inactive GDP-bound states. Silencing RhoGDI1 expression or uncoupling αvß8 integrin-RhoGDI1 protein interactions blocks GBM cell invasion due to Rho GTPase hyperactivation. These data reveal for the first time that αvß8 integrin, via interactions with RhoGDI1, regulates activation of Rho proteins to promote GBM cell invasiveness. Hence targeting the αvß8 integrin-RhoGDI1 signaling axis might be an effective strategy for blocking GBM cell invasion.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glioblastoma/genetics , Integrins/genetics , cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein/genetics , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/genetics , rho Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitor alpha/genetics , Animals , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Adhesion/genetics , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Integrins/antagonists & inhibitors , Integrins/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Invasiveness/genetics , Neoplasm Transplantation , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Signal Transduction , Stereotaxic Techniques , cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , rho Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitor alpha/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...