Safety and tolerability of biodegradable balloon spacers in patients undergoing radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy is a common treatment for prostate cancer, and can be administered in various ways, including 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy. During treatment the gastrointestinal tract may be exposed to radiation and the rectal wall may be exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation, which can lead to rectal bleeding, ulcers or fistulas, and an increased risk of rectum cancer. Various strategies to minimize these complications have been developed in the last decade; one of the most promising is to use a rectal balloon to fixate the prostate gland during treatment or to inject biodegradable spacers between the prostate and rectum to reduce the rectal dose of radiation. Aim of our paper is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of spacers implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2021 to June 2022 all patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer with unfavorable/ intermediate risk - poor prognosis and programmed hypofractionated radiation therapy were enrolled. In all patients biodegradable balloons spacers were placed posteriorly to the prostate to increase the separation between prostate and rectum. The duration of the procedure, observation time, the appearance of early and late complications and their severity (according to Charlson comorbidity index) and tolerability of the device were recorded at the time of positioning and after 10 days. RESULTS: 25 patients were enrolled in our study. Two patients (8%) underwent acute urine retention resolved with catheterization and one patient (4%) developed a mild perineal hematoma that did not require any treatment. As regards late complications 1 patient (4%) developed hyperpyrexia (> 38°C) the day after the procedure requiring continuation of antibiotic regimen. At T1 visit we recorded no medium-high grade complications. As for the tolerability of the device, it was optimal with no perineal discomfort or alterations of bowel function. CONCLUSIONS: Biodegradable balloon spacers appears to be safe and well tolerated and its positioning does not present any technical difficulties or risks of major complications.

The role of irrigation fluid in transurethral resection of the prostate outcomes and surgeon performance.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold-standard for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement (BPE) associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), after failure of conservative therapy. At present, only resection-rate (grams of prostate resected over time) is regarded as an efficiency parameter to evaluate the skill of the operator and to assess the outcome of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five surgeons performed TURP using a Gyrus-type bipolar system in 123 patients with BPE/LUTS who came to our observation from June 2016 to December 2019. The amount of irrigation fluid used during the procedure was registered and correlated to the operating time, resection-rate, prostate adenoma weight, post-operative bladder irrigation time, intraoperative bleeding and days of catheterization. RESULTS: We found an inverse correlation between the amount of irrigation fluid used during TURP and the resection-rate recorded for all operators, according to Spearman's Correlation (r = -0.78, p = 0.002); a direct correlation was also found between the amount of irrigation fluid and the adenoma weight. Finally, we also found a direct correlation with intraoperative bleeding and the duration and amount of bladder irrigation during and after TURP. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of irrigation fluid used is proposed as a reliable parameter to estimate the efficiency of the endoscopic procedure as well to assess the skill of the operator and shortterm results. The observed data encourage the possibility of applying this new efficiency indicator to all endoscopic maneuvers.

Uncommon complication of endoscopic ureterolithotripsy: the stone granuloma.

Endoscopic management of urolithiasis is one of the commonest urological procedures today. It is usually safe and effective but one of the possible complications is ureteral obstruction. Stone fragmentation after ballistic lithotripsy and ureteral wall perforation could explain the mechanism responsible for this occurrence. We report a case of stone granuloma, occurring after a ballistic ureterolithotripsy.

Tamsulosin treatment increases clinical success rate of single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

OBJECTIVES: To design a randomized, no-treatment, controlled, prospective study to determine whether the administration of tamsulosin, as adjunctive medical therapy, increases the efficacy of one extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) session to treat renal stones and decreases the use of analgesic drugs after the procedure. METHODS: A total of 130 patients underwent a single ESWL session to treat solitary radiopaque renal stones 4 to 20 mm in diameter. After treatment, all patients were randomly assigned to receive our standard medical therapy alone (controls) or in association with 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily for a maximum of 12 weeks. All 130 patients were followed up for 3 months or until an alternative treatment was given. RESULTS: Of the 130 patients, 78.5% of those receiving tamsulosin and 60% of controls had achieved clinical success at 3 months (P = 0.037). When we stratified patients according to stone size, for those with a stone size larger than 10 mm, the success rate was significantly greater in the tamsulosin group (P = 0.028). Renoureteral colic occurred in 76.9% of patients treated with standard therapy but in only 26.1% of those receiving tamsulosin (P < 0.001). The mean cumulative diclofenac dose was 375 mg per patient in the tamsulosin group and 675 mg per patient in the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have demonstrated that tamsulosin therapy, as an adjunctive medical therapy after ESWL, is more effective than lithotripsy alone for the treatment of patients with large renal stones and is equally safe. In addition, our results also indicated that adjunctive treatment with tamsulosin could decrease the use of analgesic drugs after ESWL.