Promising Perinatal Outcome after Using a Simplified Low-Cost IVF Culture System Specifically Designed for Resource-Poor Countries.

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive techniques services are often not accessible to the majority of infertile couples in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) due to high costs. Lowering IVF laboratory costs is a crucial step to make IVF affordable for a larger part of the world population. We developed a simplified culture system (SCS) which has proven to be effective, and the next step is to prove its safety. METHODS: Preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) of 176 singletons born after using the SCS, 105 after fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET), and 71 after frozen embryo transfer (frozen ET) were compared with all IVF/ICSI singletons born in Belgium between 2013 and 2018. When comparing our 105 SCS babies born after fresh ET with all Belgian babies born after conventional IVF only, we also adjusted for 7 risk factors known to influence perinatal outcome, namelythe mother's age, day of transfer, pituitary inhibition protocol, rank of cycles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and gender of the baby. FINDINGS: Before adjustment, we found a significantly higher PTB (10.2% vs. 3.8%, OR 2.852, 95% CI [1.042-7.803], p-value 0.0413) and LBW (9.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 3.692, 95% CI [1.163-11.721], p-value 0.0267) in the conventional IVF group versus SCS after fresh ET. After adjusting for seven risk parameters, these differences remained significant (PTB: OR 2.627, 95% CI [1.013-6.816], p-value 0.0471) and LBW: OR 3.267, 95% CI [1.118-9.549], p-value 0.0305). PTB and LBW between both groups was not significantly different for singletons born after frozen ET. INTERPRETATION: Taking into account the small series, PTB and LBW rates in SCS singletons in FRET cycles are very reassuring and significantly lower compared to babies born after conventional IVF in Belgium. Being aware of its effectiveness, our results offer a good perspective for SCS to become an important tool to implement low-cost IVF in LMIC.

The case for mild stimulation for IVF: recommendations from The International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction.

The practice of ovarian stimulation for IVF is undergoing a fundamental re-evaluation as recent data begin to successfully challenge the traditional paradigm that ovarian stimulation should be aimed at the retrieval of as many oocytes as possible, in the belief that this will increase pregnancy rates. An opposing view is that live birth rate should not be the only end-point in evaluating the success of IVF treatment and that equal emphasis should be placed on safety and affordability. The International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction (ISMAAR) committee has carried out an up-to-date literature search, with the evidence being graded according to the University of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The recommendations were formulated taking into account the quality of evidence on the efficacy, risk and cost of each intervention. ISMAAR recommends adopting a mild approach to ovarian stimulation in all clinical settings as an increasing body of evidence suggests that mild stimulation is as effective as conventional stimulation, while being safer and less expensive. Mild ovarian stimulation could replace conventional stimulation, thus making IVF safer and more accessible worldwide.

Multiyear outcomes using sibling oocytes demonstrates safety and efficacy of a simplified culture system consistent with use in a low-cost IVF setting.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a novel closed simplified IVF culture system be used to achieve outcomes comparable to those obtained with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) followed by conventional culturing? DESIGN: This analysis is part of a non-inferiority prospective study comparing ICSI and a simplified culture system (SCS) for gamete fertilization in a selected group of patients. According to protocol, sibling oocytes in intact cumulus-oocyte complexes were randomly distributed between ICSI and conventional insemination in the SCS. For women, selection criteria included being under 43 years of age and at least six eggs at retrieval. An inseminating motile sperm count ≥1 million was required. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate (>12 weeks) per cycle; secondary outcome measures included fertilization rate, miscarriage rate and implantation rate (ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo). RESULTS: From January 2016 until December 2019, 653 SCS/ICSI cycles were performed yielding a total of 7915 oocytes. The fertilization rate was 61.1% and 50.4% for SCS and ICSI (P < 0.0001), respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 32.0% for SCS and 36.7% for ICSI (P = 0.27). Implantation rate was 30.6% for SCS and 34.4% for ICSI (P = 0.35). The miscarriage rate was 7.5% and 6.5% for SCS and ICSI, respectively (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in ongoing pregnancy rate, implantation rate and the miscarriage rate between SCS and ICSI in this selected patient cohort.

Perinatal outcome of babies born after using a simplified IVF culture system versus ICSI with sibling oocytes: a prospective cohort study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a difference in perinatal outcome in the same patient cohort for babies conceived following randomization of sibling oocytes allocated to a simplified IVF culture system (SCS) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) followed by conventional culturing? DESIGN: The study compared the perinatal outcomes of 367 babies born from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2020 after using split SCS and ICSI insemination of sibling oocytes in a selected group of normo-responsive women, excluding cases of severe male infertility. Primary outcome measures were preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks' gestation), low birthweight (LBW; <2.5 kg) and small for gestational age (SGA) as a primary outcome parameter while secondary outcome measures included mean birthweight, mean gestational age, extreme prematurity (<32 weeks), very low birthweight (<1.5 kg), perinatal mortality, multiple pregnancy and Caesarean section rate. RESULTS: A total of 105 and 103 singleton babies were born after fresh embryo transfer (FRET) and 71 and 50 singletons after frozen embryo transfer (FET) in the SCS and ICSI groups, respectively. For babies born after FRET, the LBW rate was 2.9% (3/105) for SCS and 7.8% (8/103) for ICSI (P = 0.10). LBW occurred in 4.2% (3/71) and 0% (0/50) of babies born after the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed SCS and ICSI embryos, respectively (P = 0.14). The rate of PTB was 3.8% and 6.8% for SCS and ICSI in FRET cycles (P = 0.33), and 8.5% and 6.0% for SCS and ICSI in FET cycles (P = 0.62). One congenital malformation was found in the SCS FET group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in perinatal outcome for singleton and twin babies born after SCS and ICSI.

Maximizing live birth rates cannot be the only key performance indicator of IVF.

The success of IVF is currently measured by pregnancy or live birth rate only, without any consideration given to health outcomes for the woman and baby and the total cost of treatment. A successful IVF cycle should be redefined as the birth of a healthy singleton baby at term, without compromising the health and safety of the woman and baby achieved at the lowest possible cost. We recommend that the performance indices for an IVF programme should be based on a weighted scoring system according to live birth per embryo transferred, cumulative live birth rate over 1 year, total cost of treatment cycle and maternal and perinatal outcomes. This holistic approach would prevent the use of unnecessary high stimulation, unproven add-ons without regard for the welfare of the patients and would increase accessibility to IVF treatment.

Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How many oocytes or embryos are needed to optimize the live birth rate (LBR) per cycle and cumulative LBR (CLBR) following mild stimulation IVF (MS-IVF) in women with uncompromised ovarian reserve? DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a 4-year database of five fertility centres. The study population included women with normal/high ovarian reserve, who underwent autologous MS-IVF (daily ≤150 IU gonadotrophin) with fresh and subsequent frozen embryo transfer(s) (FET) from surplus embryos. Only the first cycle of each patient was included. Cycles with >150 IU daily average of gonadotrophin were excluded. 'Freeze-all embryo' (FAE) cycles were analysed separately. RESULTS: A total of 862 consecutive cycles fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 592 were eligible for fresh embryo transfer, 239 had non-elective 'freeze-all' cycles. Median age (25-75th percentile) of women who had fresh embryo transfer was 35 (32-37) years, median antral follicle count 19 (14-28) and anti-Müllerian hormone 19.2 (13-28.9) pmol/l. LBR/fresh cycle and CLBR inclusive of FAE cycles in the <35, 35-37, 38-39 and 40-42 year age groups were 37.8% and 45.1%, 36.0% and 41.6%, 18.4% and 29.1%, and 8.9% and 18.1%, respectively. The LBR following fresh embryo transfer plateaued after nine oocytes (40.3%) or four embryos (40.8%). The CLBR optimized when 12 oocytes (42.9%) or nine embryos (53.8%) were obtained. The LBR per oocyte peaked in women under 35 years when <5 oocytes were retrieved (11.4%), then declined with age and with higher oocyte yield. There were no cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). CONCLUSION: Nine oocytes, or four embryos, can optimize fresh transfer cycle LBR in MS-IVF. The CLBR are optimized with 12 oocytes, or nine embryos in predicted normal responders, while safeguarding against OHSS.

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: To evaluate parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on IVF where comparisons were made between a mild (≤150 IU daily dose) and conventional stimulation in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients described as poor, normal and non-polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) hyper-responders to IVF. SEARCH METHODS: Searches with no language restrictions were performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane central, Pre-Medicine from January 1990 until April 2020, using pre-specified search terms. References of included studies were hand-searched as well as advance access articles to key journals. Only parallel-group RCTs that used ≤150 IU daily dose of gonadotrophin as mild-dose IVF (MD-IVF) and compared with a higher conventional dose (CD-IVF) were included. Studies were grouped under poor, normal or hyper-responders as described by the authors in their inclusion criteria. Women with PCOS were excluded in the hyper-responder group. The risk of bias was assessed as per Cochrane Handbook for the included studies. The quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed according to the GRADE system. PRISMA guidance was followed for review methodology. OUTCOMES: A total of 31 RCTs were included in the analysis: 15 in the poor, 14 in the normal and 2 in the hyper-responder group. Live birth rates (LBRs) per randomisation were similar following use of MD-IVF in poor (relative risk (RR) 0.91 (CI 0.68, 1.22)), normal (RR 0.88 (CI 0.69, 1.12)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.98 (CI 0.79, 1.22)) when compared to CD-IVF. QoE was moderate. Cumulative LBRs (5 RCTs, n = 2037) also were similar in all three patient types (RR 0.96 (CI 0.86 1.07) (moderate QoE). Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly less with MD-IVF than CD-IVF in both normal (RR 0.22 (CI 0.10, 0.50)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.47 (CI 0.31, 0.72)), with moderate QoE. The CCRs were comparable in poor (RR 1.33 (CI 0.96, 1.85)) and hyper-responders (RR 1.31 (CI 0.98, 1.77)) but increased with MD-IVF among normal responders (RR 2.08 (CI 1.38, 3.14)); all low to very low QoE. Although fewer oocytes were retrieved and fewer embryos created with MD-IVF, the proportion of high-grade embryos was similar in all three population types (low QoE). Compared to CD-IVF, MD-IVF was associated with less gonadotrophin use and lower cost. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This updated review provides reassurance on using MD-IVF not only for the LBR per cycle but also for the cumulative LBR, with moderate QoE. With risks identified with 'freeze-all' strategies, it may be time to recommend mild-dose ovarian stimulation for IVF for all categories of women i.e. hyper, poor and normal responders to IVF.

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mild ovarian stimulation is a treatment option for poor responders in IVF treatment. Our updated review evaluated mild IVF solely from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used genuine low-dose gonadotrophin (≤150 IU daily) alone or in combination with oral medications, comparing it with conventional-dose (>150 IU/ daily) IVF for poor responders. Electronic searches on MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PreMEDLINE, and hand searches from 2002 up to 31 January 2019, identified 14 RCTs, which were compiled with the above inclusion criteria. The risk of bias (ROB) and quality of evidence (QOE) were assessed as per Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses found no difference in live birth rate (four RCTs, n = 1057, RR 0.91, CI 0.66 to 1.25) (moderate QOE), ongoing pregnancy rate (six RCTs, n = 1782, RR 1.01, CI 0.86 to 1.20) (moderate-high QOE) and cycle cancellation rates (14 RCTs, n = 2746, RR 1.38, CI 0.99 to 1.92) (low QOE). Fewer oocytes and embryos were obtained from mild IVF; however, the number and proportion of high-grade embryos were similar. Mild IVF resulted in reduced gonadotrophin use and cost. The inference remained unchanged when smaller studies with ROB were excluded, or whether gonadotrophin alone or combination with oral medication was used. The evidence of equal efficacy from a pooled population, which was adequately powered for live birth, supported a mild IVF strategy for poor responders in preference to more expensive conventional IVF. Although clinical heterogeneity remained a limiting factor, it increased the generalizability of the findings.

Mild stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

It has been proven that the use of high gonadotropin dose does not necessarily improve the final outcome of IVF. Mild ovarian stimulation is based on the principle of optimal utilization of competent oocytes/embryos and endometrial receptivity. There is growing evidence that the pregnancy or live birth rates with mild-stimulation protocols are comparable to those with conventional IVF; the cumulative pregnancy outcome has been shown to be no different, despite having fewer numbers of oocytes or embryos available with milder ovarian stimulation. Although equally effective, mild-stimulation IVF is associated with a greater safety profile, in terms of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and venous thromboembolism. It is also found to be better tolerated by patients and less expensive. Emerging research evidence may lead to widespread acceptance of mild IVF, by both patients and IVF providers, and make IVF more accessible to women and couples worldwide.

The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge due to the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, with some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available, enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. The ESHRE/ESGE Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. The consensus is developed based on (1) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy performing a systematic review of evidence and (2) consensus for (a) the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and (b) the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynaecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in "symptomatic" patients belonging to high-risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine avaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the sub-group of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopy. The various diagnostic methods should be used in a proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. The role of a combined ultrasound examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity.

The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? SUMMARY ANSWER: The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge because of the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The ESHRE/ESGE CONgenital UTerine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The consensus is developed based on: (i) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy by performing a systematic review of evidence and (ii) consensus for the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between the interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional (3D) US is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in 'symptomatic' patients belonging to high risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the subgroup of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopically. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The various diagnostic methods should always be used in the proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The role of a combined US examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

Mild approaches in assisted reproduction--better for the future?

Mild approaches in assisted reproduction are aimed at achieving quality and not quantity of gametes, embryos, and endometrium with a view to protecting the long-term health and welfare of women and children at an affordable cost. The true success of IVF is in creating children who are full term and normal for gestational age without compromising the health of their mothers. Equal access to IVF treatment can only be achieved by reducing the cost and complications. The state and the society should not suffer as a consequence of IVF treatment. This is the time for change.

First births with a simplified culture system for clinical IVF and embryo transfer.

This study reports the outcome results from a pilot clinical trial using a simplified laboratory method for human IVF. This system reproducibly generates de novo the atmospheric and culture conditions that support normal fertilization and preimplantation embryogenesis to the hatched blastocyst stage without the need for specialized medical-grade gases or equipment. Development from insemination to the hatched blastocyst stage occurs undisturbed in a completely closed system that enables timed performance assessments for embryo selection in situ that, in this study, involved single-embryo transfers on day 3. With the simplified culture system, 8/23 embryos implanted, one miscarried at 8weeks of gestation and seven healthy babies have been born. The methodology and results are discussed with regard to how this simplified system can be adopted worldwide to meet the growing need for accessible and affordable IVF. A common notion concerning the demographics of infertility is that it is largely a phenomenon associated with developed countries, where infertility treatments are commonplace. In fact, most infertile couples reside in developing/low-resource countries where infertility diagnosis and treatment is nonexistent, inaccessible or unaffordable by the vast majority of young men and women in need. The irony of this situation is that bilateral tubal occlusions, for which IVF was originally indicated and is the most effective treatment, is by far the most common cause of their infertility. We have addressed one aspect of this issue, the IVF laboratory, as part of a wider effort by the Walking Egg Project to design and establish small, dedicated centres in developing countries to provide assisted reproduction technologies that are affordable and accessible to a wider proportion of the population in need. The methods for conventional IVF designed to addresses tubal obstructions are relatively simple and free of complex instrumentation and the highly developed infrastructure common to high-resource centres. This simplified IVF system self-generates culture conditions in a closed system. After prolonged preclinical testing, a pilot clinical study was initiated in 2012 in Genk, Belgium. The findings suggest that a significant first step has been achieved in the effort to bring advanced assisted reproduction to developed countries using a low-resource but highly effective IVF system capable of bringing modern reproductive medicine to infertile couples in low-resource societies.

In vitro maturation of human immature oocytes for fertility preservation.

Cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes, or ovarian tissues is the main option for female fertility preservation. Oocyte cryopreservation has emerged as especially important: the dramatic increase in the number of infants born from vitrified oocytes indicates that it is becoming one of the most important intervention options. However, oocyte cryopreservation with standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation may not be feasible for some cancer patients as there are serious concerns about the effect of ovarian stimulation with hormones on the risk of cancer recurrence. Also, urgent gonadotoxic cancer treatment may not allow sufficient time for a patient to undergo hormonal ovarian stimulation. Thus, immature oocyte retrieval from ovaries without ovarian stimulation followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification is a promising fertility preservation option for women who cannot undergo ovarian stimulation or cannot delay their gonadotoxic cancer treatment. Immature oocytes can be collected from the ovaries during both the follicular and luteal phases, which maximizes the possibility for fertility preservation. The combination of ovarian tissue cryopreservation with immature oocyte collection from the tissue followed by oocyte vitrification via in vitro maturation represents another promising approach of fertility preservation in young women with cancer.

Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later.

Ovarian stimulation to achieve multiple follicle development has been an integral part of IVF treatment. In the context of improved laboratory performance, the need for a large number of oocytes as an integral part of a successful IVF programme may be questioned. The aim of the current debate is to summarize the studies performed during the last decade to develop the concept of mild stimulation aiming to obtain fewer than eight oocytes. Here we examine the balance between IVF success and patient discomfort, and complications and cost, and how these might improve by simpler ovarian stimulation protocols aimed at retrieving fewer oocytes. We intend to analyse why progress has been rather slow and why there is much resistance to mild stimulation. Finally, presumed useful directions for future research will be discussed.