Multiplatform molecular test performance in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) have cytology that is indeterminate for malignant disease. Accurate risk stratification of these FNAs with ancillary testing would reduce unnecessary thyroid surgery. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of an ancillary multiplatform test (MPTX) that has three diagnostic categories (negative, moderate, and positive). MPTX includes the combination of a mutation panel (ThyGeNEXT®) and a microRNA risk classifier (ThyraMIR®). A blinded, multicenter study was performed using consensus histopathology diagnosis among three pathologists to validate test performance. RESULTS: Unanimous consensus diagnosis was reached in 197 subjects with indeterminate thyroid nodules; 36% had disease. MPTX had 95% sensitivity (95% CI,86%-99%) and 90% specificity (95% CI,84%-95%) for disease in prevalence adjusted nodules with Bethesda III and IV cytology. Negative MPTX results ruledout disease with 97% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI,91%-99%) at a 30% disease prevalence, while positive MPTX results ruledin high risk disease with 75% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI,60%-86%). Such results are expected in four out of five Bethesda III and IV nodules tested, including RAS positive nodules in which the microRNA classifier was useful in rulingin disease. 90% of mutation panel false positives were due to analytically verified RAS mutations detected in benign adenomas. Moderate MPTX results had a moderate rate of disease (39%, 95% CI,23%-54%), primarily due to RAS mutations, wherein the possibility of disease could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize that decisions for surgery should not solely be based on RAS or RAS-like mutations. MPTX informs management decisions while accounting for these challenges.

Incremental utility of expanded mutation panel when used in combination with microRNA classification in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

INTRODUCTION: Focused and expanded mutation panels were assessed for the incremental utility of using an expanded panel in combination with microRNA risk classification. METHODS: Molecular results were reviewed for patients who underwent either a focused mutation panel (ThyGenX®) or an expanded mutation panel (ThyGeNEXT®) for strong and weak oncogenic driver mutations and fusions. microRNA results (ThyraMIR®) predictive of malignancy, including strong positive results highly specific for malignancy, were examined. RESULTS: Results of 12 993 consecutive patients were reviewed (focused panel = 8619, expanded panel = 4374). The expanded panel increased detection of strong drivers by 8% (P < .001), with BRAFV600E and TERT promoters being the most common. Strong drivers were highly correlated with positive microRNA results of which 90% were strongly positive. The expanded panel increased detection of coexisting drivers by 4% (P < .001), with TERT being the most common partner often paired with RAS. It increased the detection of weak drivers, with RAS and GNAS being the most common. 49% of nodules with weak drivers had positive microRNA results of which 33% were strongly positive. The expanded panel also decreased the number of nodules lacking mutations and fusions by 15% (P < .001), with 8% of nodules having positive microRNA results of which 22% were strongly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Using expanded mutation panels that include less common mutations and fusions can offer increased utility when used in combination with microRNA classification, which helps to identify high risk of malignancy in the cases where risk is otherwise uncertain due to the presence of only weak drivers or the absence of all drivers.