Factors affecting the total occlusion time in eyes with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.

BACKGROUND: Amblyopia treatment by occluding the healthy eye is known to be effective during a sensitive critical period. This study aims to clarify the factors for the total occlusion time (TOT) required for the amblyopic eye to achieve a normal visual acuity (VA) level of 1.0 (0.0 logMAR equivalent). This could contribute to an efficient treatment plan for eyes with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. METHODS: Subjects were 58 patients (26 boys and 32 girls; age range, 3.6-9.2, average, 5.8 ± 1.3 years) with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. All the subjects had initially visited and completed occlusion therapy with improved VA of 1.0 or better in the amblyopic eye at Kindai University Hospital between January 2007 and March 2017. Using the subjects' medical records, we retrospectively investigated five factors for the TOT: the age at treatment, the initial VA of the amblyopic eye, refraction of the amblyopic eye, anisometropic disparity, and the presence of microstrabismus. Patient's VA improvement at one month after treatment was also evaluated to confirm the effect of the occlusion therapy. RESULTS: The initial VA of the amblyopic eye ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 (median, 0.4). The TOT ranged from 140 to 1795 (median, 598) hours with an average daily occlusion time of 7 hours. The initial VA of the amblyopic eye and presence of microstrabismus were the significant factors for the TOT (p < 0.01). To achieve VA of 1.0 or better, patients with an initial VA of ≤ 0.3 in the amblyopic eye required a longer TOT. Moreover, patients with concomitant microstrabismus required a 1.7-fold longer TOT compared to those without microstrabismus. CONCLUSION: Longer daily occlusion hours and early start of the treatment will be necessary for patients with poor initial VA or microstrabismus to complete occlusion therapy within the sensitive critical period.

Measurement of Fixational Eye Movements With the Head-Mounted Perimeter Imo.

Purpose: Although visual field testing is conducted with the subject gazing at a fixation target, constant minute eye movements, called fixational eye movements, do occur during fixation. We examined dynamic changes in fixational eye movements associated with stimulus presentation during visual field testing. Methods: We used the head-mounted perimeter imo, which is capable of measurement under binocular conditions, with the frame rate of its fixation monitoring camera improved to 300 Hz, to assess fixational eye movements in 18 healthy individuals. We measured changes in fixational eye movements during testing under monocular and binocular conditions and analyzed these changes based on the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). We also assessed the changes in the horizontal and vertical microsaccade rates separately. Results: Both the BCEA and horizontal microsaccade rates were higher at 400 to 600 msec after stimulus presentation than during stimulus presentation (P < 0.01). Additionally, the BCEA and vertical microsaccade rates were significantly lower in the binocular condition than in the monocular condition (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). We did not observe a significant correlation between the test locations and microsaccade direction during visual field testing. Conclusions: Fixational eye movements, especially vertical microsaccade rates, were lower in the binocular condition than in the monocular condition. Visual field testing under binocular conditions is a useful method for suppressing fixational eye movements and stabilizing the fixation during testing and may improve the reliability of the test results. Translational Relevance: Visual field testing under binocular conditions can make the fixation more stable during the testing compared with monocular conditions.

Effects of orthoptic training for residual diplopia after surgical repair of blowout fractures.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of orthoptic training for residual diplopia after blowout fracture (BOF) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 14 (average age, 22.9 ± 13.1 years) patients with residual diplopia, who had undergone orthoptic training after BOF surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Hospital, between August 2013 and September 2019. The orthoptic training included exercises for eye movement, convergence, and fusional area expansion. We assessed the training effects by scoring patients' Hess screen (Hess) test results and fields of binocular single vision (BSV). The scores obtained before/after surgery and after training were compared. We also investigated the factors that influenced patients' BSV scores after training. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The respective pre- and postoperative and after-training average scores were 7.0 ± 5.3, 5.4 ± 4.3, and 2.5 ± 3.2 points for Hess and 50.0 ± 41.3, 48.2 ± 35.9, and 89.4 ± 14.0 points for BSV. Neither Hess nor BSV score showed a significant difference before and after surgery (p > 0.05, the Steel-Dwass test). Compared to the postoperative (i.e., before training) scores, both Hess and BSV scores significantly improved after training (p < 0.05 for Hess, p < 0.01 for BSV; the Steel-Dwass test). CONCLUSION: Orthoptic training appeared effective in resolving residual diplopia after BOF surgery by improving patients' ocular motility and expanding the BSV field.

Three-Dimensional Torso Motion in Tethered Front Crawl Stroke and its Implications on Low Back Pain.

Low back pain is a common problem among competitive swimmers, and repeated torso hyperextension is claimed to be an etiological factor. The purpose of this study was to describe the three-dimensional torso configurations in the front crawl stroke and to test the hypothesis that swimmers experience torso hyperextension consistently across the stroke cycles. Nineteen collegiate swimmers underwent 2 measurements: a measurement of the active range of motion in 3 dimensions and a measurement of tethered front crawl stroke at their maximal effort. Torso extension beyond the active range of torso motion was defined as torso hyperextension. The largest torso extension angle exhibited during the stroke cycles was 9 ± 11° and it was recorded at or around 0.02 ± 0.08 s, the instant at which the torso attained the largest twist angle. No participant hyperextended the torso consistently across the stroke cycles and subjects exhibited torso extension angles during tethered front crawl swimming that were much less than their active range of motion. Therefore, our hypothesis was rejected, and the data suggest that repeated torso hyperextension during front crawl strokes should not be claimed to be the major cause of the high incidence of low back pain in swimmers.