A case series title: femoral nerve injury with an episode of motor neuropathy caused by gynecological surgery: a case series.

Background: Although iatrogenic nerve injury is sometimes diagnosed after gynecological surgery, its incidence is underestimated because most cases are self-limiting and underreported. Herein, we report on six cases of femoral nerve injury after gynecological surgery with both sensory and motor neuropathy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 785 patients with gynecological cancer requiring surgery, including lymph node dissection, between 2012 and 2016 at our center. The functional damage due to femoral nerve injury was postoperatively assessed and classified according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale by an orthopedist and a physiatrist. The eligibility criteria were grade 3 or less hip joint bending and muscular weakness due to nerve injury. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with an isolated sensory disorder. Results: We found six cases (0.76%) of femoral motor neuropathy resulting from gynecological surgery. All six patients underwent laparotomy using energy devices under general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia in the lithotomy position. Four of them recovered fully within 8 months from surgery with either physical therapy or no treatment, while the other two died within a year post-treatment; thus, recovery evaluation could not be accurately performed. Conclusion: Postoperative femoral nerve injury can be diagnosed based on gait disturbances and difficulties climbing stairs. It is difficult to identify risk factors for femoral nerve injury as they may involve a combination of features, such as intraoperative compression with self-retaining retractors, the lithotomy position, and the use of energy devices. The surgeon should be familiar with the nature of energy devices, make every effort to understand the necessary anatomy, and make every effort to avoid femoral nerve injury. Iatrogenic femoral nerve injury caused by gynecological surgery should be further investigated regarding the patients' quality of life postoperatively.

Effect of prior olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer on response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy.

AIM: Several years have passed since olaparib maintenance therapy was approved in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). We speculated that the response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) would be impaired at the time of recurrence after olaparib maintenance therapy. We conducted a noninterventional retrospective study to clarify this clinical question in a single institution. METHODS: We included all patients with PSROC who received olaparib after second or later line of PBC between April 18, 2018, and August 31, 2021. We evaluated the effect of olaparib maintenance therapy on PBC after progression. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients who received olaparib maintenance therapy after second or later line of PBC. Twenty-four patients relapsed after olaparib maintenance therapy, and 17 patients received PBC again. Four of 17 patients (complete response 2, partial response 2) responded to the PBC. The median progression-free survival was longer in patients with platinum-free interval ≥12 months than platinum-free interval of 6-12 months (9.7 vs 2.6 months, hazard ratio, 0.20: 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.90; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with PSROC who experienced disease progression after olaparib maintenance therapy, especially in those with platinum-free interval of 6-12 months, the response to subsequent PBC was extremely poor. The efficiency of re-administration of PBC for PSROC patients with a short-term recurrence after olaparib treatment may need to be reconsidered.

Survival impact of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIIC1 cervical adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the survival effect of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with clinical pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 at our institution were identified. Survival was compared between patients who underwent radical hysterectomy alone and those who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment. Survival analysis using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model was performed. RESULTS: We identified 80 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for clinical pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma; of these, four with pathological pelvic node-negative adenocarcinoma were excluded. Of the 76 patients, 27 underwent radical hysterectomy alone and 49 received radical hysterectomy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 53 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 51.0% in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy alone versus 53.0% in patients who received additional concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log-rank p = 0.455). CONCLUSION: The addition of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy did not significantly improve survival among patients with pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma. More appropriate treatment strategies are needed to improve the survival outcomes of these patients.

Quality of life assessment of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy during initial treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: A prospective cohort study.

AIM: Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is applied to relieve symptoms in patients with malignant ascites. We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CART performed on patients with advanced ovarian and peritoneal cancers with massive ascites during the initial treatment. METHODS: From April 2018 to July 2020, CART was performed during the initial treatment of 31 patients with advanced ovarian and peritoneal cancers with cancerous ascites. Patient characteristics and clinical information before and after CART were collected. We performed quality of life assessment using the Japanese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-J) 24 h before and after CART. RESULTS: CART was performed 38 times in 24 patients before or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 11 times in 11 patients prior to surgery. Four patients underwent CART before primary surgery and before and/or during chemotherapy. Grade 1-2 fever was observed in 18 of 31 cases (58%), and all were controllable by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CART did not adversely affect the main treatment, chemotherapy, or surgery. CART significantly improved the MDASI-J symptom and interference scores within 24 h after the procedure. The symptom and interference scores decreased from 2.4 to 1.8 and from 4.8 to 3.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CART can be safely performed and is useful for symptom relief and improvement of general condition prior to initial surgery and during initial chemotherapy in ovarian and peritoneal cancers. Performing CART at the time of initial treatment may facilitate initiation of the main treatment.