Effect of digital enhancement on the radiographic assessment of vertical root fractures in the presence of different intracanal materials: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of enhancement tools of intraoral digital radiographs on the assessment of vertical root fracture (VRF) and to quantify the resultant image noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty single-rooted human teeth (15 control and 15 fractured) were each radiographed in four intracanal conditions: no filling, gutta-percha, metal post, and fiberglass post, totaling 120 original images. Two filters were applied to the original images-Sharpen filter (SF) and Edge Enhancement filter (EE), and brightness and contrast were adjusted in four combinations (B&C1 to 4), resulting in 840 images. Five oral radiologists analyzed the images for VRF detection. Pixel intensity was obtained in two regions from the radiographs. Diagnostic values were calculated and compared by two-way ANOVA, and the SD values of pixel intensity values were compared by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in accuracy for VRF detection between the experimental groups (p > 0.05). Teeth with metal post presented the lowest sensitivity (p < 0.05) for all experimental conditions, except for SF and EE (p > 0.05). B&C2, B&C3, and B&C4 had higher specificity than SF (p ≤ 0.05) for all intracanal conditions. Analysis of pixel intensity showed that all enhanced images presented statistically significant higher noise compared to those of the original images (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Digital enhancement tools in digital radiography increase image noise; however, they can be used without compromising VRF detection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of digital enhancement does not impair the detection of VRF and, therefore, can be applied for this purpose according to the observer preference.

Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm activated at different times during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition on the magnitude of artifacts generated by a zirconium implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumes were obtained with and without a zirconium implant in a human mandible, using the OP300 Maxio unit. Three modes were tested: without MAR, with MAR activated after acquisition, and with MAR activated before acquisition. Artifacts were assessed in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 6 regions of interest with different distances (10 to 35 mm, from the nearest to the farthest) and angulations (70° to 135°) from the implant region. RESULTS: In the acquisitions without MAR, the regions closer to the implant (10 and 15 mm) had a higher SD and lower CNR than the farther regions. When MAR was activated (before or after), SD values did not differ among the regions (P>0.05). The region closest to the implant presented a significantly lower CNR in the acquisitions without MAR than when MAR was activated after the acquisition; however, activating MAR before the acquisition did not yield significant differences from either of the other conditions. CONCLUSION: Both modes of MAR activation were effective in decreasing the magnitude of CBCT artifacts, especially when the effects of the artifacts were more noticeable.

Is Panoramic Imaging Equivalent to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Classifying Impacted Lower Third Molars?

PURPOSE: Preoperative recognition of the relative position of the mandibular third molars may contribute to more reliable treatment planning, avoiding injuries and decreasing surgical and recovery times. The research questions for this study were as follows: 1) Is panoramic radiography (PR) equivalent to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in determining the degree of mandibular third molar impaction? 2) For PR, is the external oblique ridge a more reliable reference to determine the degree of mandibular third molar impaction? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-series study assessed whether the imaging modalities (primary predictor variable) are equivalent in determining the degree of impaction of third molars (primary outcome variable) according to the parameters of the Pell and Gregory classification. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated PR and CBCT images presenting at least 1 mandibular third molar. The degrees of impaction related to the ascending ramus and related to the external oblique ridge (secondary outcome variables) also were assessed. The agreement rates between PR and CBCT were presented, and the imaging modalities were compared by the McNemar-Bowker test (α = .05). RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included (66 male and 107 female patients). Among these patients, 313 mandibular third molars were assessed. In relation to the occlusal plane, the agreement rate between PR and CBCT was 82.1% for Pell and Gregory class A, 90.5% for class B, and 65.6% for class C (P = .116). The overall agreement rate between the classifications in relation to the mandibular ramus on PR and CBCT ranged from 66.8% (considering the ascending ramus, P < .001) to 76.4% (considering the external oblique ridge, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: PR performs similarly to CBCT in the classification of impaction in relation to the occlusal plane. However, PR shows a tendency to underestimate the space for accommodation of the third molar compared with CBCT. Furthermore, the external oblique ridge is not a reliable alternative landmark on PR.