Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 24(3): 369-378, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928835

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the CBCT referrals in paediatric patients over a 24-month period. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in two radiological centers in Campinas, Brazil. Patients were divided into three age groups: G1: age under 10 years, G2: age between 10 and 12 years, and G3: age over 12 years. The following data were collected: patients' age and sex, localisation, reasons for referral and dental specialty responsible for the request of CBCT exams. RESULTS: Data from 367 patients were assessed. CBCT was used more frequently in the Group 3 (58.9%). There was significant association between the region of the exam and age group (P < 0.05), with a higher percentage of exams in the maxilla for the age over 12 years (35.6%) than that of up to 10 years (50.9%) and between 10 and 12 years (51.1%). Alterations were observed in 79.3% of the exams and 47.4% showed impacted teeth with significant association with the increase in age group (P < 0.05). Of the total number of exams, (55.3%) were requested in Orthodontics followed by Oral Surgery (30.0%) and Paediatric Dentistry (9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that CBCT exams were indicated frequently for the age over 12 years. The presence of impacted teeth represented the main reason for referrals and Orthodontics was the dental specialty that indicated CBCT with higher frequency.


Subject(s)
Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Child , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Brazil , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Referral and Consultation
2.
Int Endod J ; 52(10): 1410-1416, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31111507

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the association between endodontic technical errors and the root canal configuration (RCC) of human premolars, as well as their relationship with periapical lesions through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODOLOGY: The sample consisted of CBCT scans belonging to 136 patients, totalling 152 root filled premolars (185 roots). CBCT images were evaluated by two oral radiologists. RCC was recorded according to Vertucci's classification, and the endodontic treatment quality was judged on the presence and type of technical endodontic errors (underfilling, overfilling, nonhomogeneous filling, nonfilled canal, fractured instruments, root deviation and absence of coronal restoration). In addition, the presence of periapical lesions associated with each RCC was recorded. Data were expressed by frequencies and percentages, and intraobserver agreement was calculated using the Kappa test. RESULTS: The most common RCC was type I (71%), followed by type IV (15%), type II (8%), type V (3%), type VI (1%) and type III (1%). Types VII and VIII were not observed in the sample. Underfilling was the most frequent endodontic technical error for most RCCs, except for types IV, V and 'other', whose most frequent error was a nonfilled canal. The presence of technical errors was greater with an increase in the proportion of the periapical lesions. The intraobserver agreement was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in the prevalence of endodontic technical errors and in the presence of periapical lesions as the anatomical complexity of the root canals increased. Underfilled and nonfilled canal were the most frequent endodontic technical errors.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Bicuspid , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Root Canal Therapy
3.
Int Endod J ; 49(5): 500-8, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033046

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the influence of an artefact reduction algorithm (ARA) and several root filling materials on the detection of root fractures on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODOLOGY: Forty-four teeth were divided into control and fractured groups and scanned on a Picasso Trio CBCT device under four conditions: unrestored, filled with gutta-percha cones, cast-gold or fibreglass posts; either with or without applying the ARA. Three calibrated examiners assessed the images. ROC analysis, anova and pairwise Tukey LSD test were performed. RESULTS: No significant difference between the groups with and without the ARA was observed. There was no significant interaction between the algorithm and root condition. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in the mean values of sensitivity (Sn) and accuracy (Ac) amongst the different root filling groups (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ARA did not influence the diagnosis of root fractures, and its effects did not depend on root conditions. In relation to the filling materials, gold posts reduced the overall CBCT diagnostic ability, regardless of the use of the ARA.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Tooth Fractures/diagnosis , Tooth Root , Gutta-Percha , Humans
4.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 43(3): 20130374, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24408819

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cone beam CT (CBCT) enhancement filters influence the diagnosis of longitudinal root fractures. METHODS: 40 extracted human posterior teeth were endodontically prepared, and fractures with no separation of fragments were made in 20 teeth of this sample. The teeth were placed in a dry mandible and scanned using a Classic i-CAT® CBCT device (Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, PA). Evaluations were performed with and without CBCT filters (Sharpen Mild, Sharpen Super Mild, S9, Sharpen, Sharpen 3 × 3, Angio Sharpen Medium 5 × 5, Angio Sharpen High 5 × 5 and Shadow 3 × 3) by three oral radiologists. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated by the kappa test. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were determined. McNemar test was applied for agreement between all images vs the gold standard and original images vs images with filters (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Means of intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent. Angio Sharpen Medium 5 × 5 filter obtained the highest positive predictive value (80.0%) and specificity value (76.5%). Angio Sharpen High 5 × 5 filter obtained the highest sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (77.5%) value. Negative predictive value was the highest (82.9%) for S9 filter. The McNemar test showed no statistically significant differences between images with and without CBCT filters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although no statistical differences was observed in the diagnosis of root fractures when using filters, these filters seem to improve diagnostic capacity for longitudinal root fractures. Further in vitro studies with endodontic-treated teeth and research in vivo should be considered.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Filtration/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Tooth Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Root/injuries , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tooth Fractures/classification , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging , Tooth, Nonvital/diagnostic imaging
5.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(6): 771-5, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23290566

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pneumatization of the glenoid fossa and articular eminence by means of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. CBCT images of 658 patients (1316 joints) were evaluated to determine pneumatization in the articular eminence (PAT) and roof of the glenoid fossa (PGF). Age and gender were recorded for all patients and, for the cases of pneumatization, laterality and type (unilocular or multilocular) were noted. Its prevalence was correlated with gender, age and laterality by statistical analyses. 21.3% of individuals presented with PAT and 38.3% presented with PGF. Considering the temporomandibular joint, PAT was in 15.5% and PGF in 30.2%. Of PAT cases, 54.3% were unilateral and 45.7% bilateral; 3.4% were unilocular and 96.6% were multilocular. In the PGF cases, 42.5% were unilateral and 57.5% bilateral; 0.02% was unilocular and 99.8% were multilocular. There was no statistical difference regarding gender and age; but there was statistical difference regarding laterality, with higher frequency on the left side. In conclusion, there was a significant prevalence of PAT and PGF in the studied population; their prevalence seems higher than has been previously supposed.


Subject(s)
Anatomic Variation , Temporal Bone/anatomy & histology , Temporal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint/anatomy & histology , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Air , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...