Insect chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90 cooperatively enhance toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins and counteract insect resistance.

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) produces different insecticidal proteins effective for pest control. Among them, Cry insecticidal proteins have been used in transgenic plants for the control of insect pests. However, evolution of resistance by insects endangers this technology. Previous work showed that the lepidopteran insect Plutella xylostella PxHsp90 chaperone enhanced the toxicity of Bt Cry1A protoxins by protecting them from degradation by the larval gut proteases and by enhancing binding of the protoxin to its receptors present in larval midgut cells. In this work, we show that PxHsp70 chaperone also protects Cry1Ab protoxin from gut proteases degradation, enhancing Cry1Ab toxicity. We also show that both PxHsp70 and PxHsp90 chaperones act cooperatively, increasing toxicity and the binding of Cry1Ab439D mutant, affected in binding to midgut receptors, to cadherin receptor. Also, insect chaperones recovered toxicity of Cry1Ac protein to a Cry1Ac-highly resistant P. xylostella population, NO-QAGE, that has a disruptive mutation in an ABCC2 transporter linked to Cry1Ac resistance. These data show that Bt hijacked an important cellular function for enhancing its infection capability, making use of insect cellular chaperones for enhancing Cry toxicity and for lowering the evolution of insect resistance to these toxins.

In vivo nanoscale analysis of the dynamic synergistic interaction of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa toxins in Aedes aegypti.

The insecticidal Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa proteins are produced by Bacillus thuringiensis as crystal inclusions. They work synergistically inducing high toxicity against mosquito larvae. It was proposed that these crystal inclusions are rapidly solubilized and activated in the gut lumen, followed by pore formation in midgut cells killing the larvae. In addition, Cyt1Aa functions as a Cry11Aa binding receptor, inducing Cry11Aa oligomerization and membrane insertion. Here, we used fluorescent labeled crystals, protoxins or activated toxins for in vivo localization at nano-scale resolution. We show that after larvae were fed solubilized proteins, these proteins were not accumulated inside the gut and larvae were not killed. In contrast, if larvae were fed soluble non-toxic mutant proteins, these proteins were found inside the gut bound to gut-microvilli. Only feeding with crystal inclusions resulted in high larval mortality, suggesting that they have a role for an optimal intoxication process. At the macroscopic level, Cry11Aa completely degraded the gastric caeca structure and, in the presence of Cyt1Aa, this effect was observed at lower toxin-concentrations and at shorter periods. The labeled Cry11Aa crystal protein, after midgut processing, binds to the gastric caeca and posterior midgut regions, and also to anterior and medium regions where it is internalized in ordered "net like" structures, leading finally to cell break down. During synergism both Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa toxins showed a dynamic layered array at the surface of apical microvilli, where Cry11Aa is localized in the lower layer closer to the cell cytoplasm, and Cyt1Aa is layered over Cry11Aa. This array depends on the pore formation activity of Cry11Aa, since the non-toxic mutant Cry11Aa-E97A, which is unable to oligomerize, inverted this array. Internalization of Cry11Aa was also observed during synergism. These data indicate that the mechanism of action of Cry11Aa is more complex than previously anticipated, and may involve additional steps besides pore-formation activity.

Functional Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt1Aa Is Necessary To Synergize Lysinibacillus sphaericus Binary Toxin (Bin) against Bin-Resistant and -Refractory Mosquito Species.

The binary (Bin) toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus is effective to mosquito larvae, but its utilization is threatened by the development of insect resistance. Bin toxin is composed of the BinB subunit required for binding to midgut receptors and the BinA subunit that causes toxicity after cell internalization, mediated by BinB. Culex quinquefasciatus resistance to this toxin is caused by mutations that prevent expression of Bin toxin receptors in the midgut. Previously, it was shown that the Cyt1Aa toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis restores Bin toxicity to Bin-resistant C. quinquefasciatus and to Aedes aegypti larvae, which are naturally devoid of functional Bin receptors. Our goal was to elucidate the mechanism involved in Cyt1Aa synergism with Bin in such larvae. In vivo assays showed that the mixture of Bin toxin, or its BinA subunit, with Cyt1Aa was effective to kill resistant larvae. However, no specific binding interaction between Cyt1Aa and the Bin toxin, or its subunits, was observed. The synergy between Cyt1Aa and Bin toxins is dependent on functional Cyt1Aa, as demonstrated by using the nontoxic Cyt1AaV122E mutant toxin affected in oligomerization and membrane insertion, which was unable to synergize Bin toxicity in resistant larvae. The synergism correlated with the internalization of Bin or BinA into anterior and medium midgut epithelial cells, which occurred only in larvae treated with wild-type Cyt1Aa toxin. This toxin is able to overcome failures in the binding step involving BinB receptor by allowing the internalization of Bin toxin, or its BinA subunit, into the midgut cells.IMPORTANCE One promising management strategy for mosquito control is the utilization of a mixture of L. sphaericus and B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis insecticidal toxins. From this set, Bin and Cyt1Aa toxins synergize and display toxicity to resistant C. quinquefasciatus and to A. aegypti larvae, whose midgut cells lack Bin toxin receptors. Our data set provides evidence that functional Cyt1Aa is essential for internalization of Bin or its BinA subunit into such cells, but binding interaction between Bin and Cyt1Aa is not observed. Thus, this mechanism contrasts with that for the synergy between Cyt1Aa and the B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cry toxins, where active Cyt1Aa is not necessary but a specific binding between Cry and Cyt1Aa is required. Our study established the initial molecular basis of the synergy between Bin and Cyt1Aa, and these findings enlarge our knowledge of their mode of action, which could help to develop improved strategies to cope with insect resistance.

N-glycosylation influences the catalytic activity of mosquito α-glucosidases associated with susceptibility or refractoriness to Lysinibacillus sphaericus.

Cqm1 and Aam1 are α-glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.20) expressed in Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti larvae midgut, respectively. These orthologs share high sequence similarity but while Cqm1 acts as a receptor for the Binary (Bin) insecticidal toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus, Aam1 does not bind the toxin, rendering Ae. aegypti refractory to this bacterium. Aam1 is heavily glycosylated, contrasting to Cqm1, but little is known regarding how glycosylation impacts on its function. This study aimed to compare the N-glycosylation patterns and the catalytic activities of Aam1 and Cqm1. Mutant proteins were generated where predicted Aam1 N-glycosylation sites (N-PGS) were either inserted into Cqm1 or abrogated in Aam1. The mutants validated four N-PGS which were found to localize externally on the Aam1 structure. These Aam1 and Cqm1 mutants maintained their Bin binding properties, confirming that glycosylation has no role in this interaction. The α-glucosidase activity of both proteins was next investigated, with Aam1 having a remarkably higher catalytic efficiency, influenced by changes in glycosylation. Molecular dynamics showed that glycosylated and nonglycosylated Aam1 models displayed distinct patterns that could influence their catalytic activity. Differential N-glycosylation may then be associated with higher catalytic efficiency in Aam1, enhancing the functional diversity of related orthologs.

Avaliação da alfa-glicosidase Cqm1 de Culex quinquefasciatus e o impacto de suas mutações na fisiologia de larvas / Evaluation of a-glucosidase Cqm1 from Culex quinquefasciatus and the impact of its mutations on larvae physiology

Lysinibacillus sphaericus (Lsp) e uma bacteria entomopatogena que produz a toxina Binaria (Bin) com atividade larvicida para culicideos. A sua acao em Culex quinquefasciatus depende da ligacao da toxina Bin a alfa-glicosidase (Aglu) Cqm1, que atua como receptor no epitelio intestinal de larvas. Na colonia R2362, foram caracterizados dois alelos de resistencia ao Lsp: cqm1REC e cqm1REC-2, cujas mutacoes impedem a expressao da Aglu Cqm1. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a atividade catalitica da Cqm1 e comparar a atividade alfa-glicosidase e o desenvolvimento pre-imaginal de larvas de individuos susceptiveis (S) e resistentes (R) para cada alelo. Para isto, foram avaliados os seguintes parametros: atividade catalitica da Cqm1 recombinante; padrao de transcricao de outras Aglus paralogas a Cqm1; atividade de Aglus nativas em larvas; sobrevivencia de individuos frente a diferentes dietas. A Aglu Cqm1 mostrou atividade enzimatica otima a 37o C, pH 7,5-8,0 e utilizando o substrato sintetico pNalfaG. A atividade alfa-glicosidase total em larvas S e R foi similar, apesar da ausencia de expressao da Cqm1 nas larvas R. A investigacao in silico revelou 18 proteinas paralogas a Cqm1 e, dentre 11 investigadas, nove sao expressas em larvas S e R. A analise quantitativa de tres paralogas demonstrou que duas tem um padrao de transcricao mais elevado em larvas resistentes, sugerindo a existencia de um mecanismo de compensacao de expressao de alfa-glicosidases. O desenvolvimento pre-imaginal de larvas S foi decrescente nas seguintes dietas: racao de gatos, racao de peixes, leite desnatado, extrato de levedura e sacarose. De uma forma global, a taxa de sobrevivencia de larvas R foi inferior a S em todas as dietas testadas. Os dados obtidos mostram que as mutacoes ligadas aos alelos cqm1REC e cqm1REC-2 nao parecem impactar a atividade Aglu nas larvas e que o custo biologico observado poderia estar relacionado a outros genes e vias metabolicas.

Non conserved residues between Cqm1 and Aam1 mosquito α-glucosidases are critical for the capacity of Cqm1 to bind the Binary toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus.

The Binary (Bin) toxin from the entomopathogenic bacterium Lysinibacillus sphaericus acts on larvae of the culicid Culex quinquefasciatus through its binding to Cqm1, a midgut-bound α-glucosidase. Specific binding by the BinB subunit to the Cqm1 receptor is essential for toxicity however the toxin is unable to bind to the Cqm1 ortholog from the refractory species Aedes aegypti (Aam1). Here, to investigate the molecular basis for the interaction between Cqm1 and BinB, recombinant Cqm1 and Aam1 were first expressed as soluble forms in Sf9 cells. The two proteins were found to display the same glycosilation patterns and BinB binding properties as the native α-glucosidases. Chimeric constructs were then generated through the exchange of reciprocal fragments between the corresponding cqm1 and aam1 cDNAs. Subsequent expression and binding experiments defined a Cqm1 segment encompassing residues S129 and A312 as critical for the interaction with BinB. Through site directed mutagenesis experiments, replacing specific sets of residues from Cqm1 with those of Aam1, the 159GG160 doublet was required for this interaction. Molecular modeling mapped these residues to an exposed loop within the Cqm1's structure, compatible with a target site for BinB and providing a possible explanation for its lack of binding to Aam1.