Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Int J Cosmet Sci ; 45 Suppl 1: 20-32, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799079

ABSTRACT

Skin cancer continues to increase in incidence year-on-year and represents the most common form of cancer across the globe. Every human undergoes premature ageing, particularly on the face, neck and hands. Both phenomena are driven primarily by chronic, daily exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR). While sunscreen products play a primary role in the prevention of UVR skin damage, the active ingredients, i.e., UVR filters, are facing unprecedented challenges in the coming 10 years and their future is by no means certain. This article, therefore, reviews afresh the facts around photoprotection and the role of sunscreen products in the prevention of acute (sunburn) and chronic (cancer, photoageing) skin damage and compares/contrasts these with various emerging questions and opinions around UVR filter technology. We present a passionate defence of this remarkable technology, but also attempt to imagine a world without it.


L'incidence du cancer de la peau continue d'augmenter année après année, et ce cancer est le plus fréquent dans le monde. Tous les êtres humains connaissent un vieillissement prématuré, en particulier au niveau du visage, du cou et des mains. Les deux phénomènes sont causés principalement par une exposition quotidienne chronique aux rayons ultraviolets (UVR) du soleil. Bien que les protections solaires jouent un rôle essentiel dans la prévention des lésions cutanées dues aux UVR, les principes actifs, c'est-à-dire les filtres UVR, seront confrontés à des difficultés sans précédent dans les 10 prochaines années, et leur avenir n'est en aucun cas certain. Cet article examine donc les faits concernant la photoprotection et le rôle des produits de protection solaire dans la prévention des lésions cutanées aiguës (coups de soleil) et chroniques (cancer, photovieillissement) ; et les compare/oppose aux différentes questions et opinions émergentes concernant la technologie des filtres UVR. Nous présentons une défense passionnée de cette technologie remarquable, mais nous essayons également d'imaginer un monde sans elle.


Subject(s)
Skin Neoplasms , Sunburn , Animals , Humans , Sunscreening Agents , Ultraviolet Rays , Endangered Species , Sunburn/prevention & control , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Skin Neoplasms/etiology
2.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 181: 114093, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813178

ABSTRACT

A nationwide online survey assessed claimed usage of sunscreen products in 2283 self-identified regular sun protection factor (SPF) consumers (RSPFC) in the United States. Subjects applied sunscreen most frequently when spending more than 3 h in the sun. Sunscreen usage peaks during the summer, with sunny weather prompting 99% usage of beach/recreational SPF products but drops to approximately 50% and 30% on partly cloudy and cloudy days, respectively, regardless of SPF product category. About half of RSPFC augment sunscreen product usage by limiting time in the sun and wearing a hat. SPF products are not reapplied by approximately 20-60% of RSPFC, depending upon product category, and reapplication was less than 33% on cloudy and partly cloudy days. Primary reasons for reapplication were water exposure, number of hours in the sun, and being active/sweating, most notably for beach/recreational SPF products. Importantly, in children, 45% of parents reported "redness" as a signal for reapplying sunscreen product. Only 10% of respondents correctly identified sunscreen products as drugs. Based on these results, while sunscreens may share common ingredients and efficacy measures, their usage by consumers varies widely depending on product type, season, weather, gender, age, and geographical location.


Subject(s)
Sun Protection Factor , Sunscreening Agents , Child , Humans , United States , Sunlight , Erythema , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Lasers Surg Med ; 55(4): 414-422, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883997

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal devices are convenient for consumers. Consumer safety associated with home-use IPL devices, however, remains a subject of interest. In this descriptive analysis, we assessed the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) for a home-use IPL device from postmarketing surveillance and qualitatively compared these with AEs from clinical studies and medical device reports of home-use IPL treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this analysis of voluntary reports, we queried a distributor's postmarketing database for IPL devices for the period beginning January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. All sources of comments, for example, phone, e-mail, company-sponsored web sites, were included in the analysis. AE data were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Also, we conducted a PubMed search to identify AE profiles from existing literature on home-use IPL devices and we searched the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for reports on home-use IPL devices. These results were qualitatively compared to the data in the postmarketing surveillance database. RESULTS: A total of 1692 cases involving IPL were identified from voluntary reports of AEs between 2016 and 2021. The shipment-adjusted reporting rate for AE cases (number of AE cases/100,000 shipped IPL devices) was 67/100,000 during this 6-year period. The most commonly reported AEs were pain of skin 27.8% (470/1692), "thermal burn" 18.7% (316/1692), and erythema 16.0% (271/1692). Among the top 25 AEs reported, no unexpected health events were observed. The reported AEs were qualitatively similar to the pattern seen in clinical studies and the MAUDE database associated with such home-use IPL treatments. CONCLUSION: This is the first such report documenting AEs for home-use IPL hair removal from a postmarketing surveillance program. These data are supportive of the safety of such home-use low-fluence IPL technology.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy , Humans , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Skin , Erythema/etiology , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/methods , Pain
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 136: 105281, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288771

ABSTRACT

The phototoxic potential of a number of furocoumarins is well established. On the other hand, studies have shown that bergamottin, a furocoumarin containing a bulky, hydrophobic side chain, has significantly less or is even absent of phototoxicity potential. The OECD Test Guideline 432 3T3/Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) in vitro phototoxicity test has shown to be a highly predictive test for identifying compounds that exhibit no phototoxicological potential. In this study using OECD 432, the established phototoxic furocoumarin 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP), 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and psoralen were phototoxic, whereas bergamottin showed no phototoxic potential. When compared to 5-MOP, 8-MOP and psoralen, bergamottin was clearly negative at molar-adjusted concentrations that were more than 9 times higher than those that produced phototoxicity in 8-MOP; nearly 16 times than those for psoralen and more than 36 times higher than those for 5-MOP. These data using in vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test (OECD 432) are supportive of earlier studies showing bergamottin does not exhibit phototoxicological properties. The detection and quantification of bergamottin should therefore not contribute to the potential marker furocoumarins for risk management interventions intended to reduce the phototoxicity of natural furocoumarin containing preparations.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Phototoxic , Furocoumarins , Humans , Methoxsalen/toxicity , Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development , Ultraviolet Rays , Furocoumarins/toxicity , Dermatitis, Phototoxic/etiology , Neutral Red
5.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 84(15): 609-631, 2021 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886436

ABSTRACT

The broad spectrum antimicrobial/antifungal zinc pyrithione (ZnPT) is used in products ranging from antifouling paint to antidandruff shampoo. The hazard profile of ZnPT was established based upon comprehensive toxicological testing, and products containing this biocide have been safely used for years. The purpose of this study was to create a dermal physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for ZnPT in the rat for improving dose-response analysis of ZnPT-induced toxicity where reversible hindlimb weakness was the endpoint used as the basis for ZnPT risk assessments. Previously, we developed a PBPK model which simulated the kinetics of pyrithione (PT) and its major metabolites 2-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine and S-glucuronide conjugates in blood and tissues of rats following oral ZnPT administration. The dermal model was optimized utilizing in vitro dermal penetration investigations conducted with rat skin and with historical data from a dermal repeat dose study using rats. The model replicated the observed temporal patterns and elimination kinetics of [14C]PT equivalents in blood and urine during and following repeated dermal dosing and replicated the observed dose-dependencies of absorption, blood [14C]PT equivalents and plasma PT concentrations. The model provided internal dosimetry predictions for a benchmark dose analysis of hindlimb weakness in rats that combined dermal, gavage and dietary studies into a single internal dose-response model with area-under-the-curve (AUC) for plasma PT, the toxic moiety in the rat, as the internal dose metric. This PBPK model has predictive validity for calculating internal doses of PT and/or [14C]PT equivalents from different routes of exposure in the rat.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Absorption, Physiological , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Rats , Skin/metabolism
6.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 80(2): 69-90, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28085645

ABSTRACT

The broad-spectrum antimicrobial zinc pyrithione (ZnPT) is used in numerous products ranging from in-can preservative/mildicide in paints to antidandruff shampoo. Although products containing ZnPT have a long history of safe use, regulatory agencies routinely set limits of exposure based upon toxicological considerations. The objective of this study was to create a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for ZnPT in the rat for improving dose-response analysis of ZnPT-induced toxicity, reversible hindlimb weakness, the endpoint that has been used as the basis for ZnPT risk assessments. A rat oral PBPK model was developed that includes compartments for plasma, liver, kidneys, muscle, brain, and rapidly and slowly perfused tissues. Pyrithione metabolism to 2-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine (MSP) and glucuronide conjugates was incorporated into the model. The model was parameterized and optimized based upon data from single-dose intravenous (iv) and oral gavage pharmacokinetic studies of radiolabeled pyrithione ([14C]PT) administered as zinc [14C]-pyrithione (Zn-[14C]PT) to adult female rats. It was further evaluated and refined using data from repeated, multidose oral gavage and dietary studies of Zn[14C]PT in the adult female rat that included measurements of plasma PT concentration, the putative toxic species. The model replicated the observed short-term elimination kinetics of PT in plasma and [14C]PT in whole blood following single doses and longer term temporal patterns of plasma and blood concentrations during repeated dosing schedules. The model also accounted for production and rapid elimination of S-glucuronide conjugates (SG) of 2-pyridinethiol and 2-pyridinethiol-1-oxide in urine, as well as production and slower elimination of MSP, the major [14C]PT species in blood within several hours following administration of ZnPT. The model provided internal dosimetry predictions for a benchmark dose (BMD) analysis of hindlimb weakness in rats, and was used to combine gavage and dietary studies into a single internal dose-response model with area under the curve (AUC) for plasma PT as the internal dose metric. This PBPK model has predictive validity for calculating internal doses of PT and/or [14C]PT from different routes of exposure in the rat.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Models, Biological , Rats
7.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 80: 116-24, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27316554

ABSTRACT

A quantitative human risk assessment of chloroxylenol was conducted for liquid hand and dishwashing soap products used by consumers and health-care workers. The toxicological data for chloroxylenol indicate lack of genotoxicity, no evidence of carcinogenicity, and minimal systemic toxicity. No observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) were established from chronic toxicity studies, specifically a carcinogenicity study that found no cancer excess (18 mg/kg-day) and studies of developmental and reproductive toxicity (100 mg/kg-day). Exposure to chloroxylenol for adults and children was estimated for two types of rinse-off cleaning products, one liquid hand soap, and two dishwashing products. The identified NOAELs were used together with exposure estimates to derive margin of exposure (MOE) estimates for chloroxylenol (i.e., estimates of exposure over NOAELs). These estimates were designed with conservative assumptions and likely overestimate exposure and risk (i.e., highest frequency, 100% dermal penetration). The resulting MOEs ranged from 178 to over 100, 000, 000 indicating negligibly small potential for harm related to consumer or health-care worker exposure to chloroxylenol in liquid soaps used in dish washing and hand washing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Consumer Product Safety , Hand Disinfection/methods , Health Personnel , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Soaps/adverse effects , Xylenes/adverse effects , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/analysis , Data Mining , Databases, Factual , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Rats , Risk Assessment , Soaps/analysis , Toxicity Tests/methods , Xylenes/analysis
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24433498

ABSTRACT

Photostability or photo-instability of sunscreen products is most often discussed in undesirable terms with respect to human safety. The health risks, specifically associated with sunscreens, photostable or photo-unstable, include phototoxic/photoirritation or photoallergic responses and, longer-term, an increased risk of skin cancers or photoageing. The aims of this paper are to define photostability/photo-instability and objectively assess the acute and chronic toxicological consequences from the human exposure to UV filter/sunscreens and any probable photo-degradation products. The reported prevalence of photoirritation and photoallergic responses to sunscreens is rare compared with adverse events, for example, skin irritation or sensitization, produced by cosmetics or topically applied drugs and do not directly implicate potential photo-degradation products of UV filters. Moreover, for at least one photo-unstable combination, octyl methoxycinnamate and avobenzone, the long-term benefits to humans, i.e., reduction in skin cancers, seem to outweigh any potential adverse consequences attributed to photo-degradation. Sunscreen products are formulated to achieve maximum efficacy which, by necessity and design, incorporate measures to support and promote photostability since all organic UV filters have the potential to photo-degrade. Current performance measures, in vivo SPF and in vitro UVA, conducted under standardized conditions, in part account for photostability. The concerns expressed when considering human exposure to potential photo-unstable UV filters or sunscreen products may not manifest as health risks under conditions of use. Still, improvement in sunscreen product photostability continues to be a key strategic objective for manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Sunscreening Agents , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Stability , Humans , Prevalence , Skin Irritancy Tests/methods , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunscreening Agents/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use
9.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 63(3): 480-8, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22687423

ABSTRACT

This is the report from the "ECVAM-EFPIA workshop on 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test: Practical Experience and Implications for Phototoxicity Testing", jointly organized by ECVAM and EFPIA and held on the 25-27 October 2010 in Somma Lombardo, Italy. The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) was established in 1991 within the European Commission Joint Research, based on a Communication from the European Commission (1991). The main objective of ECVAM is to promote the scientific and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods which are of importance to the biosciences and which reduce, refine and replace the use of laboratory animals. The European Federation of Pharmaceuticals Industries and Association (EFPIA) represent the pharmaceutical industry operating in Europe. Through its direct membership of 31 national associations and 40 leading pharmaceutical companies, EFPIA is the voice on the EU scene of 2200 companies committed to researching, developing and bringing to patients new medicines that improve health and the quality of life around the world. The workshop, co-chaired by Joachim Kreysa (ECVAM) and Phil Wilcox (GSK, EFPIA) involved thirty-five experts from academia, regulatory authorities and industry, invited to contribute with their experiences in the field of phototoxicology. The main objectives of the workshop were: -to present 'in use' experience of the pharmaceutical industry with the 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Phototoxicity Test (3T3 NRU-PT), -to discuss why it differs from the results in the original validation exercise, -to discuss technical issues and consider ways to improve the usability of the 3T3 NRU-PT for (non-topical) pharmaceuticals, e.g., by modifying the threshold of chemical light absorption to trigger photo-toxicological testing, and by modifying technical aspects of the assay, or adjusting the criteria used to classify a positive response. During the workshop, the assay methodology was reviewed by comparing the OECD Test Guideline (TG 432) with the protocols used in testing laboratories, data from EFPIA and JPMA 'surveys' were presented and possible reasons for the outcomes were discussed. Experts from cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries reported on their experience with the 3T3 NRU-PT and evidence was presented for phototoxic clinical symptoms that could be linked to certain relevant molecules. Brainstorming sessions discussed if the 3T3 NRU-PT needed to be improved and whether alternatives to the 3T3 NRU-PT exist. Finally, the viewpoint from EU and US regulators was presented. In the final session, the conclusions of the meeting were summarized, with action points. It was concluded that the 3T3 NRU-PT identifies phototoxicological hazards with a 100% sensitivity, and thus is accepted as the tier one test that correctly identifies the absence of phototoxic potential. Consequently, positive results in the 3T3 NRU-PT often do not translate into a clinical phototoxicity risk. Possible ways to improve the practical use of this assay include: (i) adaptation of changed UV/vis-absorption criteria as a means to reduce the number of materials tested, (ii) reduction of the highest concentration to be tested, and (iii) consideration of modifying the threshold criteria for the prediction of a positive call in the test.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives/methods , Dermatitis, Phototoxic , Neutral Red/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , 3T3 Cells , Animals , Biological Assay/methods , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicity , Dermatitis, Phototoxic/etiology , Drug Industry , Mice , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism
10.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 9(4): 495-509, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20354643

ABSTRACT

Based on the current weight of evidence of all available data, the risk for humans from the use of nano-structured titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) or zinc oxide (ZnO) currently used in cosmetic preparations or sunscreens is considered negligible. There is a large body of information that when viewed in its entirety is considered as sufficient to demonstrate that these nano-structured ultraviolet (UV) filters, irrespective of various treatments (coatings) or crystalline structure, can be regarded as safe for use at concentrations up to 25% in cosmetic products to protect the skin from harmful effects of solar UV radiation. "Nano" TiO(2) and ZnO formulated in topically applied sunscreen products exist as aggregates of primary particles ranging from 30-150 nm in size. These aggregates are bonded such that the force of sunscreen product application onto the skin would have no impact on their structure or result in the release of primary particles. Multiple studies have shown that under exaggerated test conditions neither nano-structured TiO(2) nor ZnO penetrates beyond the stratum corneum of skin. Further, the distribution and persistence of these nano-structured metal oxides is the same compared to larger pigment-grade (i.e., >100 nm) particles, demonstrating equivalence in the recognition and elimination of such material from the body. Finally, the in vitro genotoxic and photogenotoxic profiles of these nano-structured metal oxides are of no consequence to human health. Whereas the most logical, straightforward conclusion based on data from internationally-recognized guideline studies and current 20+ year history of human use is that nano-structured TiO(2) and ZnO are safe, there will continue to be questions as "nano" conjures images of technology gone awry. Despite this rather sober view, the public health benefits of sunscreens containing nano TiO(2) and/or ZnO outweigh human safety concerns for these UV filters.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Nanostructures/chemistry , Nanostructures/toxicity , Titanium/chemistry , Titanium/toxicity , Zinc Oxide/chemistry , Zinc Oxide/toxicity , Animals , Humans , Skin Absorption , Titanium/metabolism , Toxicity Tests , Zinc Oxide/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...