ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare diagnostic sensitivities of a rapid test (Rt) and an ELISA kit for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in virus-RT-PCR-positive (VPP) and virus-RT-PCR-unchecked (VPU) subjects in an Egyptian cohort during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results revealed higher sensitivity of the Rt for detecting IgM/IgG in the VPP subjects. Both the Rt and ELISA showed identical sensitivities for IgM detection in the VPU subjects. The ELISA was more sensitive for detecting IgG in the VPU subjects. Generally, within both the VPP and the VPU groups, Rt was more sensitive for detecting IgM/IgG among the symptomatic (S) compared to asymptomatic (AS) subjects than ELISA. Within the VPP group, the Rt was more sensitive for detecting both IgM/IgG among the AS subjects than ELISA. In the VPU group, the Rt was more sensitive for detecting IgM among the S subjects than ELISA. The ELISA was more sensitive for detecting IgM/IgG among AS subjects than the Rt. From these results we concluded that, despite the limitation of sample size, this study indicates suitability of the used Rt for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG among S subjects and sheds light on possibility of relying on the used ELISA for IgG detection among AS human subjects.
