Tabelecleucel for EBV+ PTLD after allogeneic HCT or SOT in a multicenter expanded access protocol.

ABSTRACT: Patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV+ PTLD) in whom initial treatment fails have few options and historically low median overall survival (OS) of 0.7 months after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and 4.1 months after solid organ transplant (SOT). Tabelecleucel is an off-the-shelf, allogeneic EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immunotherapy for EBV+ PTLD. Previous single-center experience showed responses in patients with EBV+ PTLD after HCT or SOT. We now report outcomes from a multicenter expanded access protocol in HCT (n = 14) and SOT (n = 12) recipients treated with tabelecleucel for EBV+ PTLD that was relapsed/refractory (R/R) to rituximab with/without chemotherapy. The investigator-assessed objective response rate was 65.4% overall (including 38.5% with a complete and 26.9% with a partial response), 50.0% in HCT, and 83.3% in SOT. The estimated 1- and 2-year OS rates were both 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.5-84.7) overall, both 61.5% (95% CI, 30.8-81.8) in HCT, and both 81.5% (95% CI, 43.5-95.1) in SOT (median follow-up: 8.2, 2.8, and 22.5 months, respectively). Patients responding to tabelecleucel had higher 1- and 2-year OS rates (94.1%) than nonresponders (0%). Treatment was well tolerated, with no reports of tumor flare, cytokine release syndrome, or rejection of marrow and SOT. Results demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes across a broad population treated with tabelecleucel, indicating a potentially transformative and accessible treatment advance for R/R EBV+ PTLD after HCT or SOT. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02822495.

Ibrutinib-associated Arthralgias/Myalgias in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Incidence and Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has transformed the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), leading to unprecedented improvements in progression-free and overall survival for all patients, including those with poor prognostic features. The side effect profile of ibrutinib is unique compared with chemoimmunotherapy and includes atrial fibrillation, increased bleeding risk, and arthralgias/myalgias. Although common, arthralgias/myalgias and their management are poorly described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 214 patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib (as a single agent or in combination) from 2011 to 2018 at the University of Pennsylvania. RESULTS: In this cohort, 36% (76/214) of patients developed arthralgias/myalgias during follow-up with a median onset of 34.5 months. Most (79%) events were grade 1 or 2. Risk factors for developing arthralgias/myalgias included younger age at start of ibrutinib, female gender, and ibrutinib use as first treatment. Twenty-eight percent of patients with grade 1 or 2 toxicity continued ibrutinib and had resolution of symptoms. Dose holds were frequently used to manage this toxicity, and this strategy was more successful than dose reduction. Sixty-two percent of patients with grade 3 toxicity ultimately discontinued ibrutinib. Supportive care measures such as discontinuing statins or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, or corticosteroids were not used frequently enough in this cohort to evaluate their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies to determine the mechanism of ibrutinib-related arthralgias/myalgias are needed to develop optimal management strategies.

Management of giant cell hepatitis associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia - a case series and review of the literature.

Giant cell hepatitis (GCH) is a rare diagnosis in adults that is found in 0.25% of liver biopsies. GCH has been associated with multiple causes including drugs (6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate), toxins, viruses and autoimmune. GCH has been described in few patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here we describe three patients diagnosed with GCH thought to be related to underlying CLL and its management. All of our patients were treated with a combination of immunosuppression as well as CLL-directed therapy to address CLL and concomitant liver disease. GCH is a rare manifestation of active CLL and should be ruled out with prompt liver biopsy in patients with CLL with persistent transaminitis without another attributable cause. Prompt treatment of GCH with immunosuppression is required to prevent long-term liver toxicity. If transaminitis does not improve with immunosuppression alone, the addition of CLL directed therapy should be considered in patients who carry this diagnosis to prevent long-term liver toxicity.

Bexarotene in Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas: Results of a Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are generally aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas that portend poor prognosis with currently available therapies. Bexarotene, a retinoic acid derivative, has efficacy in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, but its activity in PTCL is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-institution, review of off-label bexarotene therapy in patients with PTCL between 2005 and 2016. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with bexarotene as monotherapy: 3 patients with PTCL, not otherwise specified, and 9 patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Bexarotene doses of 300 mg/m2 daily or 150 mg/m2 were used for all patients. The treatment was well-tolerated. The most common toxicities included hypothyroidism and hyperlipidemia, which were effectively managed. The overall response rate for all patients was 58% with a median duration of response of 11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 months to not estimable). Among patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, there was a 44% overall response rate. The median progression-free survival for all patients was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.1 months to not estimable), and the median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-73.1 months). CONCLUSION: Bexarotene monotherapy is well-tolerated and has encouraging activity in PTCL that warrants further investigation in prospective clinical trials.

Interim PET/CT Result Is Not Predictive of Survival in Patients With MYC-rearranged Non-Burkitt Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of MYC-rearranged non-Burkitt aggressive B-cell lymphoma (MYC-R), including those with double hit lymphoma, are at high risk of developing relapsed/refractory disease, even if treated with intensive front-line immunochemotherapy. It is common in clinical practice and clinical trials to perform an interim positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan (iPET) during front-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, the utility of the iPET result for MYC-R patients for predicting outcomes is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study with centralized pathologic review and PET/CT image acquisition and interpretation for 28 MYC-R patients. The patients received front-line therapy with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin [doxorubicin], Oncovin [vincristine], prednisone) or intensive immunochemotherapy. RESULTS: Eight patients had iPET-positive (iPET+) and 20 patients had iPET-negative (iPET-) results using the Deauville visual assessment criteria. At a median follow-up length of 30.4 months, progression-free survival was 65% and overall survival was 76%, neither of which differed significantly between the iPET- and iPET+ patients. The positive predictive value of iPET for progression at 30 months was 25%, and the negative predictive value was 65%. CONCLUSION: Although patients with MYC-R lymphoma have been reported to be at high risk of primary treatment failure, this was not predicted by iPET+ results. Thus, the iPET result should not be used to guide changes in front-line or consolidative therapy for these patients.

Nonviral RNA chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells are being investigated in many settings, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). The unique biology of cHL, characterized by scant Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells within an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), may pose challenges for cellular therapies directly targeting antigens expressed on HRS cells. We hypothesized that eradicating CD19+ B cells within the TME and the putative circulating CD19+ HRS clonotypic cells using anti-CD19-directed CAR-modified T cells (CART19) may indirectly affect HRS cells, which do not express CD19. Here we describe our pilot trial using CART19 in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL. To limit potential toxicities, we used nonviral RNA CART19 cells, which are expected to express CAR protein for only a few days, as opposed to CART19 generated by viral vector transduction, which expand in vivo and retain CAR expression. All 5 enrolled patients underwent successful manufacturing of nonviral RNA CART19, and 4 were infused with protocol-specified cell dose. There were no severe toxicities. Responses were seen, but these were transient. To our knowledge, this is the first CART19 clinical trial to use nonviral RNA gene delivery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02277522 (adult) and #NCT02624258 (pediatric).

Outcomes of CLL patients treated with sequential kinase inhibitor therapy: a real world experience.

B-cell receptor kinase inhibitor (KI) therapy represents a paradigm shift in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) management, but data on practice patterns after KI discontinuation and optimal sequencing are limited. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, comprehensive analysis on 178 patients with CLL (ibrutinib = 143; idelalisib = 35) who discontinued KI therapy. We examined responses, toxicity, post-KI therapies, and overall survival (OS). Patients had a median of 3 prior therapies (range 0-11); del17p (34%), p53 mutation (27%), del11q (33%), and complex karyotype (29%). Overall response rate (ORR) to first KI was 62% (complete response 14%). The most common reasons for KI discontinuation were toxicity (51%), CLL progression (29%), and Richter transformation (RT) (8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS from KI initiation were 10.5 and 29 months, respectively. Notably, initial KI choice did not impact PFS or OS; however, RT portended significantly inferior OS (P = .0007). One hundred fourteen patients received subsequent salvage therapy following KI discontinuation with an ORR to subsequent KI at 50% and a median PFS of 11.9 months. Median PFS in KI-intolerant patients treated with an alternate KI was not reached vs 7 months for patients with CLL progression. In summary, these data demonstrate that toxicity was the most common reason for KI discontinuation, that patients who discontinue KI due to toxicity can respond to an alternate KI, and that these responses may be durable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02717611 and #NCT02742090.

Front-line, dose-escalated immunochemotherapy is associated with a significant progression-free survival advantage in patients with double-hit lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

'Double-hit lymphomas' (DHL), defined by concurrent MYC and BCL2 (or, alternatively, BCL6) rearrangements, have a very poor outcome compared to standard-risk, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Consequently, dose-intensive (DI) therapies and/or consolidation with high-dose therapy and transplant have been explored in DHL, although benefit has been debated. This meta-analysis compared survival outcomes in DHL patients receiving dose-escalated regimens [DI: R-Hyper-CVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) or R-CODOX-M/IVAC (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, high dose cytarabine); or intermediate-dose: R-EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)] versus standard-dose regimens (R-CHOP; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in the first-line setting. Data were synthesized to estimate hazard ratios of dose-escalated treatments versus R-CHOP using a Weibull proportional hazards model within a Bayesian meta-analysis framework. Eleven studies examining 394 patients were included. Patients were treated with either front-line R-CHOP (n = 180), R-EPOCH (n = 91), or R-Hyper-CVAD/rituximab, methotrexate, cytarabine (R-M/C), R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC (DI) (n = 123). Our meta-analysis revealed that median progression-free survival (n = 350) for the R-CHOP, R-EPOCH and DI groups was 12·1, 22·2, and 18·9 months, respectively. First-line treatment with R-EPOCH significantly reduced the risk of a progression compared with R-CHOP (relative risk reduction of 34%; P = 0·032); however, overall survival (n = 374) was not significantly different across treatment approaches. A subset of patients might benefit from intensive induction with/without transplant. Further investigation into the role of transplant and novel therapy combinations is necessary.

Phase II study of MGI-114 administered intravenously for 5 days every 28 days to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

We examined the use of MGI-114 (6-hydroxymethyacylfulvene) for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Twenty-six patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (range 41-75); 64% were male and all patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. We administered a dose of 11 mg/m2/d x 5 days every 4 weeks. With a median of two cycles (range 0-6) administered, no complete responses or partial responses were observed. Four patients had no change in disease (16%); 15 patients (57%) had progressive disease; seven patients were inevaluable (27%). Toxicity was evaluated in 25 of 26 patients. The main toxicities were hematologic, including granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Neuropsychiatric adverse events included hallucination (7.7%), depression/anxiety (15.4%), and/or insomnia (19.2%). Given the lack of antitumor activity, further study of MGI-114 in colorectal cancer does not appear warranted.