ABSTRACT
Objectives: We evaluated whether dried blood spots (DBS) are suitable to monitor combined ART when samples are collected in rural Tanzania and transported over a long distance to a specialized bioanalytical laboratory. Methods: Plasma and DBS samples were collected in Tanzania from study patients treated with nevirapine, efavirenz or lopinavir. In addition, plasma, whole blood and DBS samples were obtained from a cohort of HIV patients at the site of the bioanalytical laboratory in Switzerland. DBS samples were analysed using a fully automated LC-MS/MS method. Results: Comparison of DBS versus plasma concentrations of samples obtained from the bridging study in Switzerland indicated an acceptable bias only for nevirapine (18.4%), whereas for efavirenz and lopinavir a pronounced difference of -47.4% and -48.1% was found, respectively. Adjusting the DBS concentrations by the haematocrit and the fraction of drug bound to plasma proteins removed this bias [efavirenz +9.4% (-6.9% to +25.7%), lopinavir +2.2% (-20.0% to +24.2%)]. Storage and transportation of samples from Tanzania to Switzerland did not affect the good agreement between plasma and DBS for nevirapine [-2.9% (-34.7% to +29.0%)] and efavirenz [-9.6% (-42.9% to +23.8%)]. For lopinavir, however, adjusted DBS concentrations remained considerably below [-32.8% (-70.4% to +4.8%)] corresponding plasma concentrations due to decay of lopinavir in DBS obtained under field conditions. Conclusions: Our field study shows that the DBS technique is a suitable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in resource-poor regions; however, sample stability remains an issue for certain analytes and therefore needs special consideration.
