Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Trop Med Int Health ; 25(9): 1145-1154, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32623795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between aflatoxin (AF) exposure during pregnancy and rate of gestational weight gain (GWG) in a sample of pregnant women of mixed HIV status in Gulu, northern Uganda. METHODS: 403 pregnant women were included (133 HIV-infected on antiretroviral therapy (ART), 270 HIV-uninfected). Women's weight, height and socio-demographic characteristics were collected at baseline (~19 weeks' gestation); weight was assessed at each follow-up visit. Serum was collected at baseline and tested for aflatoxin B1 -lysine adduct (AFB-lys) levels using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between AFB-lys levels and rate of GWG. RESULTS: AFB-lys levels (detected in 98.3% of samples) were higher among HIV-infected pregnant women than HIV-uninfected pregnant women [median (interquartile range): 4.8 (2.0, 15.0) vs. 3.5 (1.6, 6.1) pg/mg of albumin, P < 0.0001]. Adjusting for HIV status, a one-log increase in aflatoxin levels was associated with a 16.2 g per week lower rate of GWG (P = 0.028). The association between AFB-lys and the rate of GWG was stronger and significant only among HIV-infected women on ART [-25.7 g per week per log (AFB-lys), P = 0.009 for HIV-infected women vs. -7.5 g per week per log (AFB-lys), P = 0.422 for HIV-uninfected women]. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with higher levels of AF exposure had lower rates of GWG. The association was stronger for HIV-infected women on ART, suggesting increased risk.


OBJECTIFS: Examiner l'association entre l'exposition à l'aflatoxine (AF) pendant la grossesse et le taux de gain de poids pendant la grossesse (GWG) dans un échantillon de femmes enceintes de statut mixte VIH à Gulu, dans le nord de l' Ouganda. MÉTHODES: 403 femmes enceintes ont été incluses (133 infectées par le VIH sous traitement antirétroviral (ART), 270 non infectées par le VIH). Le poids, la taille et les caractéristiques sociodémographiques des femmes ont été collectés au départ (~19 semaines de gestation); le poids a été évalué à chaque visite de suivi. Le sérum a été recueilli au départ et testé pour les niveaux d'adduit d'aflatoxine B1 -lysine (AFB-lys) en utilisant la chromatographie liquide à haute performance (HPLC). Des modèles linéaires d'effets mixtes ont été utilisés pour examiner l'association entre les niveaux de AFB-lys et le taux de GWG. RÉSULTATS: Les niveaux de AFB-lys (détectés dans 98,3% des échantillons) étaient plus élevés chez les femmes enceintes infectées par le VIH que chez celles enceintes non infectées par le VIH [médiane (intervalle interquartile): 4,8 (2,0, 15,0) vs 3,5 (1,6, 6,1) pg/mg d'albumine, P <0,0001]. En ajustant pour le statut VIH, une augmentation d'un log des niveaux d'aflatoxine était associée à un taux de GWG inférieur de 16,2 g par semaine (P = 0,028). L'association entre AFB-lys et le taux de GWG était plus forte et significative seulement chez les femmes infectées par le VIH sous ART [-25,7 g par semaine et par log (AFB-lys), P = 0,009 pour les femmes infectées par le VIH contre -7,5 g par semaine et par log (AFB-lys), P = 0,422 pour les femmes non infectées par le VIH]. CONCLUSIONS: Les femmes enceintes présentant des niveaux plus élevés d'exposition à l'AF avaient des taux de GWG plus faibles. L'association était plus forte pour les femmes infectées par le VIH sous ART, ce qui suggère un risque accru.


Subject(s)
Aflatoxins/toxicity , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Prenatal Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aflatoxins/blood , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Weight Gain , HIV Infections/blood , Humans , Maternal Health Services , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood , Uganda , Young Adult
2.
J Community Psychol ; 48(3): 960-976, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31951288

ABSTRACT

The multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) is a 12-item measure of functional social support (SS); however, the psychometric properties of the MSPSS have not been evaluated in prisoners. We used measures of known-groups validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability and factor structure to assess the suitability of the MSPSS for measuring SS among 184 individuals in prison in the U.S., who were diagnosed with depression. The MSPSS was correlated with scores on scales measuring related constructs (i.e., loneliness), and uncorrelated with unrelated constructs (i.e., verbal ability). Correlations among items of the MSPSS on the same subscale were large, and small to moderate among items of different subscales. The overall Cronbach's α for the scale was 0.93. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the theorized three-factor solution for the MSPSS (i.e., significant other, family, and friends) provided a good fit for the data. We recommend using the MSPSS to measure perceived SS among incarcerated individuals.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Prisoners/psychology , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , United States
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 73, 2019 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing the prevalence of optimal breastfeeding practices, including exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months, could prevent an estimated 823,000 child deaths annually. Self-efficacy is an important determinant of breastfeeding behaviors. However, existing measures do not specifically assess exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy, but rather self-efficacy for any breastfeeding. Hence, we sought to adapt and validate an instrument to measure exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy. METHODS: We modified and added items from Dennis' Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF). It was then implemented in an observational cohort in Gulu, Uganda at 1 (n = 239) and 3 (n = 238) months postpartum ( clinicaltrials.gov NCT02925429). We performed inter-item and adjusted item-test correlations, as well as exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis at 1 month postpartum to remove redundant items and determine their latent factor structure. We further applied confirmatory factor analysis to test dimensionality of the scale at 3 months postpartum. We then assessed the reliability of the scale and conducted tests of predictive and discriminant validity. Known group comparisons were made by primiparous status and correct breastfeeding knowledge. RESULTS: The modification of the original BSES-SF to target exclusive breastfeeding produced 19 items, which were reduced to 9 based on item correlations and factor loadings. Two dimensions of the adapted scale, the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale to Measure Exclusive Breastfeeding BSES-EBF emerged: Cognitive and Functional subscales, with alpha coefficients of 0.85 and 0.79 at 3 months postpartum. Predictive and discriminant validity and known group comparisons assessments supported its validity. CONCLUSIONS: This version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy scale, the BSES-EBF Scale, is valid and reliable for measuring exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy in northern Uganda, and ready for adaptation and validation for clinical and programmatic use elsewhere.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Postpartum Period/psychology , Pregnancy , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Translations , Uganda , Young Adult
4.
Matern Child Nutr ; 14(3): e12579, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29356347

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for 6 months and continued breastfeeding for at least 2 years. Social support has been widely recognized to influence breastfeeding practices. However, existing scales do not measure exclusive breastfeeding social support (EBFSS), rather they assess social support for any breastfeeding. Further, they are tailored towards high-income settings. Therefore, our objectives were to develop and validate a tool to measure EBFSS in low-income settings. To develop the scale, local and international breastfeeding experts were consulted on modifications to the Hughes' Breastfeeding Social Support Scale. It was then implemented in an observational cohort in Gulu, Uganda, at 1 (n = 238) and 3 (n = 237) months post-partum (NCT02925429). We performed polychoric and polyserial correlations to remove redundant items and exploratory factor analysis at 1 month post-partum to determine the latent factor structure of EBFSS. We further applied confirmatory factor analysis to assess dimensionality of the scale at 3 months post-partum. We then conducted tests of predictive, convergent, and discriminant validity against EBF, self-efficacy, general social support, and depression. The modification of the Hughes' scale resulted in 18 items, which were reduced to 16 after examining variances and factor loadings. Three dimensions of support emerged: Instrumental, Emotional, and Informational, with alpha coefficients of 0.79, 0.85, and 0.83, respectively. Predictive, convergent, and discriminant validity of the resultant EBFSS scale was supported. The EBFSS scale is valid and reliable for measuring EBFSS in northern Uganda and may be of use in other low-income settings to assess determinants of EBF.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/psychology , Social Support , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uganda , World Health Organization , Young Adult
6.
Matern Child Nutr ; 13(3)2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27507230

ABSTRACT

Common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, affect approximately 16% of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries. Food insecurity (FI) has been shown to be associated with depressive symptoms. It has also been suggested that the association between FI and depressive symptoms is moderated by social support (SS); however, there is limited evidence of these associations among pregnant women living in low-income and middle-income countries. We studied the association between FI and depressive symptoms severity and assessed whether such an association varied among Ugandan pregnant women with low vs. high SS. Cross-sectional data were collected among 403 pregnant women in northern Uganda. SS was assessed using an eight-item version of the Duke-UNC functional SS scale. FI and depressive symptoms were assessed by, respectively, the individually focused FI scale and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. Women were categorized into two SS groups, based on scoring < or ≥ to the median SS value. Multivariate linear regression models indicated an independent association between FI and depressive symptoms severity. The association between FI and depressive symptoms severity was moderated by SS i.e. was stronger among women in the low SS category (adjusted beta (95%CI): 0.91 (0.55; 1.27)) than for women belonging to the high SS group (0.53 (0.28; 0.78)) (adjusted p value for interaction = 0.026). There is need for longitudinal or interventional studies among pregnant women living in northern Uganda or similar contexts to examine the temporal sequence of the associations among food insecurity, depressive symptoms severity and social support. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Food Supply , Pregnant Women/psychology , Social Support , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Income , Poverty , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Uganda , Young Adult
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 16(1): 187, 2016 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27460221

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight recommendations are tailored to women's pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). Limited evidence exists on methods for estimating women's pre-pregnancy BMI, particularly for women living in low and middle income countries. Using data from collected among Peruvian pregnant women, we compared the concordance between self-reported pre-pregnancy BMI with BMI measured at the earliest prenatal study visit. METHODS: Data were from the Pregnancy Outcomes Maternal and Infant Study (PrOMIS), a cohort of pregnant women at the Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal (INMP) in Lima, Peru. 2605 women aged 18 to 49 years (mean ± SD gestational age = 10.9 ± 3.3 weeks) were included in the study. Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and height and measured weight and height were collected at the first prenatal study contact. We assessed the concordance between measured and self-reported BMI; and, the agreement among indicators of nutritional status obtained using measured and self-reported BMI. RESULTS: On average, weight measured at the first prenatal study visit was 0.27 kg higher than self-reported pre-pregnancy weight (p < 0.05); and, measured height was 0.02 m lower than self-reported pre-pregnancy height (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, measured BMI was 0.71 kg/m(2) higher than self-reported BMI (p < 0.001). Scatter and Bland-Altman plots indicated strong concordance between measured and self-reported BMI. The proportion of women in the normal BMI category tended to be higher when using self-reported BMI (59.6 %) than when using measured BMI (50.4 %). Conversely, the proportion of women in the overweight or obese BMI categories tended to be lower when using self-reported BMI (38.2 %) than when using measured BMI (47.7 %). CONCLUSION: Self-reported pre-pregnancy BMI was strongly correlated with BMI measured at the first prenatal study contact. The findings potentially suggest that, in this context, there is minimal change between pre-pregnancy BMI and BMI measured at the first prenatal study contact; or, that women in this study just recalled their most recent measured anthropometrics (including values obtained during the index pregnancy but before enrollment in the PrOMIS study).


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Prenatal Care , Self Report , Adolescent , Adult , Body Height , Body Weight , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Peru , Pregnancy , Young Adult
8.
Public Health Nutr ; 18(16): 2895-905, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25171462

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability, validity and correlates of measures of food insecurity (FI) obtained using an individually focused food insecurity access scale (IFIAS) among pregnant women of mixed HIV status in northern Uganda. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study involving cognitive interviews nested within a cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The antenatal care clinic of Gulu Regional Referral Hospital. SUBJECTS: Survey respondents included 403 pregnant women, recruited in a ratio of one HIV-infected to two HIV-uninfected respondents, twenty-six (nine of them HIV-infected) of whom were asked to participate in the cognitive interviews. RESULTS: Over 80% of cognitive interview participants reported understanding the respective meanings of six of the nine items (i.e. items 4 to 9) on the IFIAS. Two main factors emerged from rotated exploratory factor analysis of the IFIAS: mild to moderate FI (IFIAS items 1-6) and severe FI (items 7-9). Together, they explained 90·4% of the FI measure's variance. The full IFIAS and the two subscales had moderate to high internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranged from 0.75 to 0.87). Dose-response associations between IFIAS scores, and measures of socio-economic status and women's diet quality, were observed. Multivariate linear regression revealed significant positive associations between IFIAS scores and HIV infection, maternal age, number of children and a history of internal displacement. IFIAS scores were negatively associated with women's diet diversity score, asset index and being employed. CONCLUSIONS: The IFIAS showed strong reliability, validity and contextual relevance among women attending antenatal care in northern Uganda.


Subject(s)
Diet , Feeding Behavior , Food Supply , Poverty , Pregnant Women , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Comprehension , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Prenatal Care , Reproducibility of Results , Social Class , Uganda , Young Adult
9.
BMC Psychiatry ; 14: 303, 2014 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25416286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the prevalence and approaches to screening for depression among pregnant women living in resource poor settings with high HIV burden. METHODS: We studied the reliability and accuracy of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in 123 (36 HIV-infected and 87 -uninfected) pregnant women receiving antenatal care at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. CES-D scores were compared to results from the psychiatrist-administered Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) for current major depressive disorder (MDD), a "gold standard" for assessing depression. We employed measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and criterion validity [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive predictive value (PPV)] to evaluate the reliability and validity of the CES-D scale. RESULTS: 35.8% of respondents were currently experiencing an MDD, as defined from outputs of the MINI-depression module. The CES-D had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and good discriminatory ability in detecting MINI-defined current MDDs (AUROC = 0.82). The optimum CES-D cutoff score for the identification of probable MDD was between 16 and 17. A CES-D cutoff score of 17, corresponding to Se, Sp, and PPV values of 72.7%, 78.5%, and 76.5%, is proposed for adoption in this population and performs well for HIV-infected and -uninfected women. After adjusting for baseline differences between the HIV subgroups (maternal age and marital status), HIV-infected pregnant women scored 6.2 points higher on the CES-D than HIV-uninfected women (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The CES-D is a suitable instrument for screening for probable major depression among pregnant women of mixed HIV status attending antenatal services in northern Uganda.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Mass Screening/standards , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Adult , Area Under Curve , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Female , HIV Infections/psychology , Humans , Interview, Psychological/methods , Interview, Psychological/standards , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uganda/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(9): 2044-53, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585398

ABSTRACT

Household food insecurity (HHFI) may be a barrier to both optimal maternal nutritional status and infant feeding practices, but few studies have tested this relationship quantitatively, and never among HIV-infected individuals. We therefore described the prevalence of HHFI and explored if it was associated with poorer maternal nutritional status, shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and fewer animal-source complementary foods. We assessed these outcomes using bivariate and multivariate analyses among 178 HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding (BF) women receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in the PROMOTE trial (NCT00993031), a prospective, longitudinal cohort study in Tororo, Uganda. HHFI was common; the prevalence of severe, moderate, and little to no household hunger was 7.3, 39.9, and 52.8 %, respectively. Poor maternal nutritional status was common and women in households experiencing moderate to severe household hunger (MSHH) had statistically significantly lower body mass index (BMIs) at enrollment (21.3 vs. 22.5, p < 0.01) and prior to delivery (22.6 vs. 23.8, p < 0.01). BMI across time during pregnancy, but not gestational weight gain, was significantly lower for MSHH [adjusted beta (95 % CI) -0.79 (-1.56, -0.02), p = 0.04; -2.06 (-4.31, 0.19), p = 0.07], respectively. The prevalence (95 % CI) of EBF at 6 months was 67.2 % (59.7-73.5 %), and the proportion of women BF at 12 months was 80.4 % (73.3-85.7 %). MSHH was not associated with prevalence of EBF at 6 months or BF at 12 months. However, among those women still EBF at 4 months (81.4 % of population), those experiencing MSHH were significantly more likely to cease EBF between 4 and 6 months (aHR 2.38, 95 % CI 1.02-5.58). The prevalence of HHFI, maternal malnutrition, and suboptimal infant feeding practices are high and the causal relationships among these phenomena must be further explored.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/complications , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Nutritional Status , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Chi-Square Distribution , Depression/etiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Family Characteristics , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/psychology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Social Class , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Time Factors , Uganda/epidemiology , Weight Gain
11.
Eat Disord ; 16(2): 146-59, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18307114

ABSTRACT

Eating behaviors were assessed by a modified SCOFF questionnaire in a National representative cross-sectional study among 2978 Israeli schoolgirls. The mean age was 14.7. Thirty percent met the criteria for disordered eating. Being Jewish or underweight reduced the odds for disordered eating. The following increased the risk: dieting, early onset of menarche, being overweight or obese, and suffering from constipation. School socio-economic status, physical activity, and smoking status were not contributory. These results help identify possible interventions to prevent the development of disordered eating behaviors.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/ethnology , Arabs/psychology , Bulimia Nervosa/ethnology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Jews/psychology , Adolescent , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Anorexia Nervosa/epidemiology , Anorexia Nervosa/psychology , Arabs/statistics & numerical data , Body Image , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnosis , Bulimia Nervosa/epidemiology , Bulimia Nervosa/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet, Reducing/psychology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Israel , Jews/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/ethnology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...