Telehealth Attitudes, Training, and Preparedness Among First-Year Internal Medicine Residents in the COVID-19 Era.

Introduction: Telehealth, especially the use of real-time video and phone visits in ambulatory care, is increasingly important in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current state of internal medicine (IM) interns' telehealth training at the start of residency is unknown. Objective: To characterize the attitudes, training, and preparedness of IM interns regarding the use of telehealth video and phone visits in ambulatory care. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of IM interns at four IM residency programs in the United States in 2020. Results: One hundred fifty-six surveys were analyzed (response rate 82%). Seventy-five percent of interns rated training in the use of real-time video and phone visits for ambulatory care as important or very important. The vast majority received no training (74%) or clinical experience (90% no prior video visits, 81% no prior phone visits) during medical school. More interns believed that primary care may be effectively delivered via video visits compared with phone visits (77% vs. 35%). Most interns (69%) missed clinical time during medical school due to the COVID-19 pandemic; 41% felt that the pandemic negatively affected their ambulatory care preparation. Overall, the majority of interns (58%) felt prepared for primary care; only 12% felt prepared to deliver primary care using either video or phone visits. Conclusions: Although IM interns had favorable attitudes toward video and phone visits, few had training or clinical experience; most felt unprepared. Residency programs may need to close training gaps for current interns in conducting telehealth video and phone visits.

Time for Clinic: Fourth-Year Primary Care Exposure and Clinic Preparedness Among Internal Medicine Interns.

BACKGROUND: Internal medicine (IM) residency graduates consistently report being less prepared for outpatient practice than inpatient medicine. Although an initial study suggested interns arriving for IM residency reported low levels of preparedness for continuity clinic, the impact of education and experience during the undergraduate medical education to graduate medical education transition on ambulatory training is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe end of medical school primary care exposure among entering IM interns and its association with self-assessed preparedness for residency continuity clinic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 161 entering IM interns in 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Entering interns at four geographically diverse IM residency programs (University of Chicago, University of North Carolina, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Washington), representing 81 US medical schools. RESULTS: A total of 139 interns (86%) responded to the survey. Surveyed interns reported a median of zero days of general internal medicine (GIM) clinic (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-20 days) and 2.5 days of multispecialty adult primary care (IQR: 0-26.5 days) during fourth year of medical school. The median last exposure to primary care was 13 months prior to internship (IQR: 7-18 months). Interns who rated themselves as prepared for primary care clinic reported a median of twenty more multispecialty adult primary care days (20 vs. 0 days; p < 0.01) and fourteen more GIM clinic days (14 vs. 0 days; p < 0.01) than their unprepared counterparts. The experiences were also more recent, with six fewer months between their last multispecialty adult primary care exposure and the start of internship (9 vs. 15 months; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of incoming IM interns had no primary care training during the fourth year of medical school. At the start of residency, IM interns who felt more prepared for their primary care clinic reported more recent and more numerous primary care experiences.

Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use Among Uninsured and Medicaid-insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: While improved access to safety net primary care providers, like federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), is often cited as a route to alleviate potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits, no studies have longitudinally established the impact of improving access to FQHCs on ED use among Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults. We aimed to determine whether improved access to FQHCs was associated with lower ED use by uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults. METHODS: Using data from the Uniform Data System, U.S. Census Bureau, and California Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of 58 California counties from 2005 to 2013. For each county-year observation, we employed three measures of FQHC access: geographic density of FQHCs (delivery sites per 100 square miles), FQHCs per county resident (delivery sites per 100,000 county residents), and the proportion of Medicaid-insured or uninsured residents ages 19 to 64 years that utilized FQHCs. We then used a fixed-effects model to examine the impact of changes in the measures of FQHC access on ED visit rates by Medicaid-insured or uninsured adults in each county. RESULTS: Increasing geographic density of FQHCs was associated with a 26% to 35% decrease in ED use by uninsured but not Medicaid-insured patients. Increasing numbers of clinics per county resident and higher percentages of Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults seen at FQHCs were not associated with reduced rates of ED use among either uninsured or Medicaid-insured adults. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to detect a consistent association between our measures of FQHC access and ED use by Medicaid-insured and uninsured nonelderly California adults, underscoring the importance of investigating additional drivers to reduce ED use among these vulnerable patient populations.

Federally Qualified Health Center Access and Emergency Department Use Among Children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increasing access to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in California was associated with decreased rates of emergency department (ED) use by children without insurance or insured by Medicaid. METHODS: We combined several data sets to longitudinally analyze 58 California counties between 2005 and 2013. We defined access to FQHCs by county using 2 measures: FQHC sites per 100 square miles between 2005 and 2012 and percentage of Medicaid-insured and uninsured children served by FQHCs from 2008 to 2013. Our outcome was rates of ED use by uninsured or Medicaid-insured children ages 0 to 18 years. To determine the effect of changes in FQHC access on the outcome within a county over time, we used negative binomial models with county fixed effects and controls for preselected time-varying county characteristics and secular trends. RESULTS: Increased geographic density of FQHC sites was associated with ≤18% lower rates of ED visits among Medicaid-insured children and ≤40% lower ED utilization among uninsured children (P = .05 and P < .01, respectively). However, the percentage of Medicaid-insured and uninsured children seen at FQHCs was not associated with any significant change in ED visit rates among Medicaid-insured or uninsured children. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas increased geographic FQHC access was associated with lower rates of ED use by uninsured children, all other measures of FQHC access were not associated with statistically significant changes in pediatric ED use. These results provide community-level evidence that expanding FQHCs may have a limited impact on pediatric ED use, suggesting the need to explore additional factors driving ED utilization.

California emergency department visit rates for medical conditions increased while visit rates for injuries fell, 2005-11.

The emergency department (ED) is the source of most hospital admissions; provides care for patients with no other point of access to the health care system; receives advanced care referrals from primary care physicians; and provides surveillance data on injuries, infectious diseases, violence, and adverse drug events. Understanding the changes in the profile of disease in the ED can inform emergency services administration and planning and can provide insight into the public's health. We analyzed the trends in the diagnoses seen in California EDs from 2005 to 2011, finding that while the ED visit rate for injuries decreased by 0.7 percent, the rate of ED visits for noninjury diagnoses rose 13.4 percent. We also found a rise in symptom-related diagnoses, such as abdominal pain, along with nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal disease, and mental illness. These trends point out the increasing importance of EDs in providing care for complex medical cases, as well as the changing nature of illness in the population needing immediate medical attention.

Children's emergency department use for asthma, 2001-2010.

OBJECTIVES: Although the emergency department (ED) provides essential care for severely ill or injured children, past research has shown that children often visit the ED for potentially preventable illnesses, including asthma. We sought to determine how children's rate of ED visits for asthma has changed over the last decade and to analyze what factors are associated with a child's potentially preventable ED visit for asthma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ED visits by children aged 2 to 17 from 2001 to 2010 using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Visits were classified as potentially preventable asthma visits by mapping ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's asthma pediatric quality indicator. We examined trends in the annual rate of ED visits for asthma per 1000 children using a weighted linear regression model. Finally, we used multivariate logistic regression to determine what demographic, clinical, and structural factors were associated with a child's ED visit being for a potentially preventable asthma crisis. RESULTS: The rate of children's ED visits for asthma increased 13.3% between 2001 and 2010, from 8.2 to 9.3 visits per 1000 children (P = .26). ED visits by children who were younger, male, racial or ethnic minorities, insured with Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program, and visiting between 11 pm and 7 am were more likely to be for potentially preventable asthma crises. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall rate of potentially preventable ED visits for asthma did not significantly change over the last decade, racial, insurance-based, and other demographic disparities in the likelihood of a preventable asthma-related ED visit persist.

Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011. RESULTS: We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10,169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of 'consumer-directed healthcare.'

A cross-sectional analysis of variation in charges and prices across California for percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Though past studies have shown wide variation in aggregate hospital price indices and specific procedures, few have documented or explained such variation for distinct and common episodes of care. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the variability in charges for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent and without major complications (MS-DRG-247), and determine whether hospital and market characteristics influenced these charges. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults admitted to California hospitals in 2011 for MS-DRG-247 using patient discharge data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. We used a two-part linear regression model to first estimate hospital-specific charges adjusted for patient characteristics, and then examine whether the between-hospital variation in those estimated charges was explained by hospital and market characteristics. RESULTS: Adjusted charges for the average California patient admitted for uncomplicated PCI ranged from $22,047 to $165,386 (median: $88,350) depending on which hospital the patient visited. Hospitals in areas with the highest cost of living, those in rural areas, and those with more Medicare patients had higher charges, while government-owned hospitals charged less. Overall, our model explained 43% of the variation in adjusted charges. Estimated discounted prices paid by private insurers ranged from $3,421 to $80,903 (median: $28,571). CONCLUSIONS: Charges and estimated discounted prices vary widely between hospitals for the average California patient undergoing PCI without major complications, a common and relatively homogeneous episode of care. Though observable hospital characteristics account for some of this variation, the majority remains unexplained.