N-terminal fatty acylation of transducin profoundly influences its localization and the kinetics of photoresponse in rods.

N-terminal acylation of the alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins is believed to play a major role in regulating the cellular localization and signaling of G-proteins, but physiological evidence has been lacking. To examine the functional significance of N-acylation of a well understood G-protein alpha-subunit, transducin (G alpha(t)), we generated transgenic mice that expressed a mutant G alpha(t) lacking N-terminal acylation sequence (G alpha(t)G2A). Rods expressing G alpha(t)G2A showed a severe defect in transducin cellular localization. In contrast to native G alpha(t), which resides in the outer segments of dark-adapted rods, G alpha(t)G2A was found predominantly in the inner compartments of the photoreceptor cells. Remarkably, transgenic rods with the outer segments containing G alpha(t)G2A at 5-6% of the G alpha(t) levels in wild-type rods showed only a sixfold reduction in sensitivity and a threefold decrease in the amplification constant. The much smaller than predicted reduction may reflect an increase in the lateral diffusion of transducin and an increased activation rate by photoexcited rhodopsin or more efficient activation of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6 by G alpha(t)G2A; alternatively, nonlinear relationships between concentration and the activation rate of transducin also potentially contribute to the mismatch between the amplification constant and quantitative expression analysis of G alpha(t)G2A rods. Furthermore, the G2A mutation reduced the GTPase activity of transducin and resulted in two to three times slower than normal recovery of flash responses of transgenic rods, indicating the role of G alpha(t) membrane tethering for its efficient inactivation by the regulator of G-protein signaling 9 GTPase-activating protein complex. Thus, N-acylation is critical for correct compartmentalization of transducin and controls the rate of its deactivation.

The Drosophila rhodopsin cytoplasmic tail domain is required for maintenance of rhabdomere structure.

The ninaE-encoded Rh1 rhodopsin is the major light-sensitive pigment expressed in Drosophila R1-6 photoreceptor cells. Rh1 rhodopsin localizes to and is essential for the development and maintenance of the rhabdomere, the specialized membrane-rich organelle that serves as the site of phototransduction. We showed previously that the vertebrate bovine rhodopsin (Rho) is expressed and properly localized in Drosophila photoreceptor cells. Drosophila photoreceptors expressing only Rho have normal rhabdomere structure at young ages, but the rhabdomeres are not maintained and show extensive disorganization by 7-10 days of age. A series of Rho-Rh1 opsin chimeric rhodopsins were used to identify Rh1 domains required for maintenance of rhabdomeric structure. The results show that the Rh1 rhodopsin cytoplasmic tail domain, positioned to interact with cytoplasmic structural components, plays a major role in promoting rhabdomeric organization.

Probing rhodopsin-transducin interaction using Drosophila Rh1-bovine rhodopsin chimeras.

Invertebrate and vertebrate rhodopsins share a low degree of homology and are coupled to G-proteins from different families. Here we explore the utility of fly-expressed chimeras between Drosophila rhodopsin Rh1 and bovine rhodopsin (Rho) to probe the interactions between the invertebrate and vertebrate visual pigments and their cognate G-proteins. Chimeric Rh1 pigments carrying individual substitutions of the cytoplasmic loops C2 and C3 and the C-terminus with the corresponding regions of Rho retained the ability to stimulate phototranduction in Drosophila, but failed to activate transducin. Surprisingly, chimeric Rho containing the Rh1 C-terminus was fully capable of transducin activation, indicating that the C-terminal domain of vertebrate rhodopsins is not essential for the functional coupling to transducin.

Heterologous expression of bovine rhodopsin in Drosophila photoreceptor cells.

PURPOSE: Vertebrate and invertebrate visual pigments are similar in amino acid sequence, structural organization, spectral properties, and mechanism of action, but possess different chromophores and trigger phototransduction through distinct biochemical pathways. The bovine opsin gene (Rho) was expressed in Drosophila, to examine the properties of a vertebrate opsin within invertebrate photoreceptor cells. METHODS: Transgenic Drosophila expressing the bovine opsin gene (Rho) in photoreceptors were created. Protein expression and cellular location of bovine rhodopsin was assessed by protein blots and immunofluorescence. The glycosylation state was determined by mobility profiles in SDS-PAGE before and after treatment with endoglycosidase. The rhodopsin chromophore was determined by HPLC-mass spectroscopy (MS) and the spectral properties by spectroscopy. The ability of the bovine rhodopsin to couple to Drosophila phototransduction components was assessed by electroretinography and to couple to vertebrate transducin by light-mediated GTPgammaS-binding assays. RESULTS: Rho showed stable expression even in the absence of endogenous Rh1 opsin and chromophore. It was correctly targeted to the rhabdomeric membranes. Rho remained glycosylated during the maturation process and possessed a distinct glycosylation pattern from that of native Rho. The Drosophila-expressed Rho associated with the 3-hydroxyretinal chromophore but failed to evoke an electroretinogram response from fly photoreceptors. However, the Drosophila-expressed Rho activated transducin in a light-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Drosophila photoreceptors express a vertebrate rhodopsin as a functional visual pigment, but the expression does not activate the Drosophila phototransduction pathway. The system allows the characterization and comparison of vertebrate and invertebrate visual pigment properties in a common cell type.

Mutation R238E in transducin-alpha yields a GTPase and effector-deficient, but not dominant-negative, G-protein alpha-subunit.

PURPOSE: Certain forms of inherited and light-induced retinal degenerations are believed to involve excessive phototransduction signaling. A dominant-negative mutant of the visual G-protein, transducin, would represent a major tool in designing potential therapeutical strategies for this group of visual diseases. We thought to further investigate a novel mutant of the transducin-alpha subunit, R238E, that was recently reported to be a dominant-negative inhibitor of the rhodopsin/transducin/PDE visual system. METHODS: The R238E substitution was introduced into a tranducin-like chimeric Gtalpha*-subunit. The nucleotide-bound state of the Gtalpha*R238E mutant was assessed using the trypsin-protection assay. The ability of the Gtalpha*R238E mutant to interact with Gtbetagamma, couple to photoexcited rhodopsin (R*), and undergo R*-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange was examined by a GTPgammaS binding assay. The GTPase activity of the mutant Gtalpha* and its interaction with RGS proteins was characterized in the steady-state and single turnover measurements of GTP hydrolysis. A binding assay utilizing the fluorescently-labeled gamma-subunit of PDE6 (Pgamma) was employed to monitor the effector function of Gtalpha*R238E. RESULTS: The Gtalpha*R238E mutant bound GDP and was capable of the AlF4--induced activational conformational change. The capacity of Gtalpha*R238E to couple to R* in the presence of Gtbetagamma was similar to that of Gtalpha*. However, the mutant GTPase activity was markedly impaired. This defect was further exacerbated by the diminished interactions of Gtalpha*R238E with the GAP proteins, RGS9 and RGS16. Another consequence of the mutation was the reduction in Gtalpha*R238E's affinity for Pgamma. CONCLUSIONS: Transducin mutant Gtalpha*R238E exists in a nucleotide-bound state and is fully capable of activational coupling to R*. This mutation results in a significant impairment of Gtalpha*'s ability to hydrolyze GTP and interact with the inhibitory subunit of PDE6. This phenotype is entirely inconsistent with that of a dominant-negative inhibitor as recently reported.

Dominant negative mutants of transducin-alpha that block activated receptor.

Mutations counterpart to dominant negative RasSer17Asn in the alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins are known to also produce dominant negative effects. The mechanism of these mutations remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects and mechanism of the Ser43Cys and Ser43Asn mutants of transducin-like chimeric Gtalpha* in the visual signaling system. Our analysis showed that both mutants have reduced affinity for GDP and are likely to exist in an empty-or partially occupied-pocket state. S43C and S43N retained the ability to interact with Gtbetagamma and, as heterotrimeric proteins, bind to photoexcited rhodopsin (R*). The interaction with R* is unproductive as the mutants failed to bind GTPgammaS and become activated. S43C and S43N inhibited R*-dependent activation of Gtalpha* and Gtalpha, apparently by blocking R*. Finally, both Gtalpha* mutants lacked interaction with the gamma-subunit of PDE6, an effector protein in phototransduction. These results indicate that the S43C and S43N mutants of Gtalpha* are dominant negative inhibitors that bind and block the activated receptor in a mechanism that parallels that of RasSer17Asn. Dominant negative mutants of Gtalpha sequestering R*, such as S43C and S43N, may become useful instruments in probing the mechanisms of visual dysfunctions caused by abnormal phototransduction signaling.

Characterization of the G alpha(s) regulator cysteine string protein.

Cysteine string protein (CSP) is an abundant regulated secretory vesicle protein that is composed of a string of cysteine residues, a linker domain, and an N-terminal J domain characteristic of the DnaJ/Hsp40 co-chaperone family. We have shown previously that CSP associates with heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) and promotes G protein inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels. To elucidate the mechanisms by which CSP modulates G protein signaling, we examined the effects of CSP(1-198) (full-length), CSP(1-112), and CSP(1-82) on the kinetics of guanine nucleotide exchange and GTP hydrolysis. In this report, we demonstrate that CSP selectively interacts with G alpha(s) and increases steady-state GTP hydrolysis. CSP(1-198) modulation of G alpha(s) was dependent on Hsc70 (70-kDa heat shock cognate protein) and SGT (small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein), whereas modulation by CSP(1-112) was Hsc70-SGT-independent. CSP(1-112) preferentially associated with the inactive GDP-bound conformation of G alpha(s). Consistent with the stimulation of GTP hydrolysis, CSP(1-112) increased guanine nucleotide exchange of G alpha(s). The interaction of native G alpha(s) and CSP was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation and showed that G alpha(s) associates with CSP. Furthermore, transient expression of CSP in HEK cells increased cellular cAMP levels in the presence of the beta2 adrenergic agonist isoproterenol. Together, these results demonstrate that CSP modulates G protein function by preferentially targeting the inactive GDP-bound form of G alpha(s) and promoting GDP/GTP exchange. Our results show that the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of full-length CSP is, in turn, regulated by Hsc70-SGT.

Interaction of transducin-alpha with LGN, a G-protein modulator expressed in photoreceptor cells.

LGN and activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) belong to the class of G-protein modulators containing G-protein regulatory motifs (GPR proteins). Evidence for the functions of these molecules has only started to emerge. Immunostaining of mouse retina cross-sections and serial tangential sectioning of the retina combined with immunoblot analysis revealed that LGN is expressed in the inner segments of photoreceptor cells. Double immunolabeling demonstrated that, following light-dependent translocation from the outer segments, the alpha-subunit of the visual G-protein transducin (Gtalpha) colocalizes with LGN in the basal part of the inner segments. LGN and Gtalpha coprecipitate from the retinal extracts, supporting the notion of the interaction between the proteins. Furthermore, the GPR domain of LGN potently inhibits receptor-mediated guanine nucleotide exchange and steady-state GTPase activity of transducin. The localization and interaction with Gtalpha suggest LGN roles in modulation of transducin translocation and other photoreceptor cell functions.

A point mutation uncouples transducin-alpha from the photoreceptor RGS and effector proteins.

A novel gain-of-function mutation, R243Q, has been recently identified in the Candida elegans Gqalpha protein EGL-30. The position corresponding to Arg243 in EGL-30 is absolutely conserved among heterotrimeric G proteins. This mutation appears to be the first gain-of-function mutation in the switch III region of Galpha subunits. To investigate consequences of the R-->Q mutation we introduced the corresponding R238Q mutation into transducin-like Gtalpha* subunit. The mutant retained intact interactions with Gtbetagamma and rhodopsin but exhibited a twofold reduction in the kcat value for guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis. The GTPase activity of R238Q was not accelerated by the RGS domain of the visual GTPase-activating protein, RGS9-1. In addition, R238Q displayed a significant impairment in the effector function. Our data and the crystal structures of transducin suggest that the major reason for the reduced intrinsic GTPase activity of R238Q and the lack of RGS9 function is the break of the conserved ionic contact between Arg238 and Glu39, which apparently stabilizes the transitional state for GTP hydrolysis. We hypothesize that the R243Q mutation in EGL-30 severs the ionic interaction of Arg243 with Glu43, leading to a defective inactivation of the mutant by the C. elegans RGS protein EAT-16.

Rhodopsin determinants for transducin activation: a gain-of-function approach.

Three cytoplasmic loops in the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin, C2, C3, and C4, have been implicated as key sites for binding and activation of the visual G protein transducin. Non-helical portions of the C2- and C3-loops and the cytoplasmic helix-8 from the C4 loop were targeted for a "gain-of-function" mutagenesis to identify rhodopsin residues critical for transducin activation. Mutant opsins with residues 140-148 (C2-loop), 229-244 (C3-loop), or 310-320 (C4-loop) substituted by poly-Ala sequences of equivalent lengths served as templates for mutagenesis. The template mutants with poly-Ala substitutions in the C2- and C3-loops formed the 500-nm absorbing pigments but failed to activate transducin. Reverse substitutions of the Ala residues by rhodopsin residues have been generated in each of the templates. Significant ( approximately 50%) restoration of the rhodopsin/transducin coupling was achieved with re-introduction of residues Cys140/Lys141 and Arg147/Phe148 into the C2 template. The reverse substitutions of the C3-loop residues Thr229/Val230 and Ser240/Thr242/Thr243/Gln244 produced a pigment with a full capacity for transducin activation. The C4 template mutant was unable to bind 11-cis-retinal, and the presence of Asn310/Lys311 was required for correct folding of the protein. Subsequent mutagenesis of the C4-loop revealed the role of Phe313 and Met317. On the background of Asn310/Lys311, the inclusion of Phe313 and Met317 produced a mutant pigment with the potency of transducin activation equal to that of the wild-type rhodopsin. Overall, our data support the role of the three cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin and suggest that residues adjacent to the transmembrane helices are most important for transducin activation.

A GPR-protein interaction surface of Gi(alpha): implications for the mechanism of GDP-release inhibition.

Proteins containing G-protein regulatory (GPR) motifs represent a novel family of guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) for G(alpha) subunits from the Gi family. They selectively interact with the GDP-bound conformation of Gi(alpha) and transducin-alpha (Gt(alpha)), but not with Gs(alpha). A series of chimeric proteins between Gi(alpha)(1) and Gs(alpha) has been constructed to investigate GPR-contact sites on G(alpha) subunits and the mechanism of GPR-protein GDI activity. Analysis of the interaction of two GPR-proteins-AGS3GPR and Pcp2-with the chimeric G(alpha) subunits demonstrated that the GPR-Gi(alpha)(1) interface involves the Gi(alpha)(1) switch regions and Gi(alpha)(1)-144-151, a site within the helical domain. Residues within Gi(alpha)(1)-144-151 form conformation-sensitive contacts with switch III, and may directly interact with a GPR-protein or form a GPR-binding surface jointly with switch III. The helical domain site is critical to the ability of GPR-proteins to act as GDIs. Our data suggest that a mechanism of the GDI activity of GPR-proteins is different from that of GDIs for monomeric GTPases and from the GDI-like activity of G(betagamma) subunits. The GPR-proteins are likely to block a GDP-escape route on G(alpha) subunits.