Abdominal Aortic Endograft Implantation Immediately Induces Vascular Stiffness Gradients That May Promote Adverse Aortic Neck Dilatation: Results of A Porcine Ex Vivo Study.

PURPOSE: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is the method of choice for most abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients requiring intervention. However, chronic aortic neck dilatation (AND) following EVAR progressively weakens the structural seal between vessel and endograft and compromises long-term results of the therapy. This experimental ex vivo study seeks to investigate mechanisms of AND. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Porcine abdominal aortas (n=20) were harvested from slaughterhouse pigs and connected to a mock circulation. A commercially available endograft was implanted (n=10) or aortas were left untreated as controls (n=10). Vascular circumferential strain was assessed via ultrasound in defined aortic segments as a parameter of aortic stiffness. Histology and aortic gene expression analysis were performed to investigate potential changes of aortic wall structure and molecular differences due to endograft implantation. RESULTS: We found that endograft implantation acutely induces a significant stiffness gradient directly at the interface between stented and unstented aortic segments under pulsatile pressure. Comparing stented aortas with unstented controls, we detected increased aortic expression levels of inflammatory cytokines (Il6 and Ccl2) and matrix metalloproteinases (Mmp2 and Mmp9) after 6 hours of pulsatile pressurization. This effect, however, was abolished when repeating the same experiment under 6 hours of static pressure. CONCLUSIONS: We identified endograft-induced aortic stiffness gradients as an early trigger of inflammatory aortic remodeling processes that might promote AND. These results highlight the importance of adequate endograft designs to minimize vascular stiffness gradients and forestall late complications, such as AND. CLINICAL IMPACT: AND may compromise the long-term results following endovascular aortic repair. However, the mechanisms behind the underlying detrimental aortic remodeling are still unclear. In this study we find that endograft-induced aortic stiffness gradients induce an inflammatory aortic remodeling response consistent with AND. This novel pathomechanistic insight may guide the design of new aortic endografts that minimize vascular stiffness gradients and forestall late complications such as AND.

Impact of distal aortic perfusion on 'segmental steal' depleting spinal cord blood flow-a quantitative experimental approach.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic steal is an underestimated risk factor for intraoperative spinal cord ischaemia. A negative effect on spinal cord perfusion in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair has been suspected if blood drains away from the cord initiated by a reversal of the arterial pressure gradient. The amount of blood and pressure loss via back-bleeding of segmental arteries and the impact of distal aortic perfusion (DaP) have not been analysed yet. The aim of our study was to quantify 'segmental steal' in vivo during simulated thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair and to determine the impact of DaP on steal and spinal cord perfusion. METHODS: Ten juvenile pigs were put on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP and visceral arteries were ligated. 'Segmental steal' was quantified by draining against gravity with/without DaP. Blood volume of 'segmental steal' was quantified and microspheres were injected for Post mortem spinal cord perfusion analysis. 'Segmental steal' was quantified with/without DaP-and with stopped DaP. RESULTS: Quantification revealed a significantly higher steal on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP with a mean difference of 24(11) ml/min. In all spinal cord segments, blood flow was diminished during steal drainage on DaP, compared to 'no steal'. The least perfused region was the low thoracic to upper lumbar segment. CONCLUSIONS: 'Segmental steal' is a relevant threat to spinal cord perfusion-even with the utilization of DaP-diminishing spinal cord perfusion. The blood volume lost by back-bleeding of segmental arteries is not to be underestimated and occlusion of segmental arteries should be considered in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair.

Effect of cerebrospinal fluid pressure elevation on spinal cord perfusion during aortic cross-clamping with distal aortic perfusion.

OBJECTIVES: Distal aortic perfusion (DaP) is a widely accepted protective adjunct facilitating early reinstitution of visceral perfusion during extended thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic repair. DaP has also been suggested to secure distal inflow to the paraspinal collateral network via the hypogastric arteries and thereby reduce the risk of spinal cord ischaemia. However, an increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure is frequently observed during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of DaP on regional spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) during descending aortic cross-clamping and iatrogenic elevation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure. METHODS: Eight juvenile pigs underwent central cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass according to our established experimental protocol followed by aortic cross-clamping of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta-mimicking sequential aortic clamping-with the initiation of DaP. Thereafter, CSF pressure elevation was induced by the infusion of blood plasma until baseline CSF pressure was tripled. At each time-point, microspheres of different colours were injected allowing for regional SCBF analysis. RESULTS: DaP led to a pronounced hyperperfusion of the distal spinal cord [SCBF up to 480%, standard deviation (SD): 313%, compared to baseline]. However, DaP provided no or only limited additional flow to the upper and middle segments of the spinal cord (C1-Th7: 5% of baseline, SD: 5%; Th8-L2: 24%, SD: 39%), which was compensated by proximal flow only at C1-Th7 level. Furthermore, DaP could not counteract an experimental CSF pressure elevation, which led to a further decrease in regional SCBF most pronounced in the mid-thoracic spinal cord segment. CONCLUSIONS: Protective DaP during thoraco-abdominal aortic repair may be associated with inadequate spinal protection particularly at the mid-thoracic spinal cord level ('watershed area') and result in the adverse effect of a potentially dangerous hyperperfusion of the distal spinal cord segments.