Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(8): 925-30, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27480895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a leading cause of health care-associated infections, and the role that the hospital environment might play in the transmission cycle remains undefined. We determined the distribution of environmental MRSA isolates, studied contamination patterns of MRSA clones, and evaluated the association between MRSA patient load and environmental contamination. METHODS: High-contact surfaces were sampled for 12 consecutive months in 2 inpatient wards. Concurrently, aggregated data of MRSA patient infection burden were analyzed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and molecular epidemiologic tools were used to characterize and analyze all isolates. RESULTS: Overall, 23.7% of the surfaces were MRSA positive. Handrails (58.3%), the medicine room (50.0%), chart holders (41.7%), and access doors (33.3%) were the most contaminated surfaces. Thirty-four different MRSA pulsotypes were identified. Forty-six percent of the isolates were SCCmecII/USA100. Recurrent introduction and reintroduction of clones and hot spot surfaces frequently contaminated with different MRSA strains were observed. However, long-term contamination (maintenance) was not observed. The burden of clinical MRSA cases was not an indicator of the level of environmental contamination. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA frequently contaminates hospital surfaces during nonoutbreak periods and is not associated with the number of clinical MRSA cases. Monitoring and thorough cleaning and disinfection of hot spot surfaces are necessary to minimize the presence of MRSA in the hospital.


Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Academic Medical Centers , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(12): 1285-90, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25465258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the occurrence and epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in public transportation in the United States. This research sought to determine the background prevalence and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of MRSA strains circulating on buses from a large, metropolitan transportation agency. METHODS: Electrostatic wipes were used to collect 237 surface samples from 40 buses randomly selected from July-October 2010. Six samples were collected from each bus immediately postservice and before any cleaning and disinfection. Positive isolates were analyzed for antibiotic resistance, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; and potential epidemiologic factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the buses, 68% (27/40) were contaminated with S aureus, and 63% (25/40) were contaminated with MRSA. Seats and seat rails were the surfaces most frequently contaminated, followed by the back door and stanchions. Most (62.9%) of the MRSA isolates were classified as community-associated MRSA clones (SCCmec type IV), and 22.9% were health care-associated MRSA clones (SCCmec type II). Of the MRSA strains, 65% (5/20) were multidrug resistant. CONCLUSION: MRSA was frequently isolated from commonly touched surfaces in buses serving both hospital and community routes. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis demonstrated that buses may be effective mixing vessels for MRSA strains of both community and health care-associated origin.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Motor Vehicles , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Genotype , Humans , Methicillin/pharmacology , Methicillin Resistance/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phenotype , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission
3.
Vet Res ; 45: 31, 2014 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24641543

ABSTRACT

The role that environmental contamination might play as a reservoir and a possible source of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for patients and personnel at equine veterinary hospitals remains undefined, as the environment has only been monitored during outbreaks or for short periods. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the monthly presence, distribution, and characteristics of environmental MRSA at an equine hospital, and to establish patterns of contamination over time using molecular epidemiological analyses. For this purpose, a yearlong active MRSA surveillance was performed targeting the environment and incoming patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, SCCmec typing, PFGE typing, and dendrographic analysis were used to characterize and analyze these isolates. Overall, 8.6% of the surfaces and 5.8% of the horses sampled were positive for MRSA. The most common contaminated surfaces were: computers, feed-water buckets, and surgery tables-mats. Ninety percent of the isolates carried SCCmec type IV, and 62.0% were classified as USA500. Molecular analysis showed that new pulsotypes were constantly introduced into the hospital throughout the year. However, maintenance of strains in the environment was also observed when unique clones were detected for 2 consecutive months on the same surfaces. Additionally, pulsotypes were circulating throughout several areas and different contact surfaces of the hospital. Based on these results, it is evident that MRSA is constantly introduced and frequently found in the equine hospital environment, and that some contact surfaces could act as "hot-spots". These contaminated surfaces should be actively targeted for strict cleaning and disinfection as well as regular monitoring.


Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Horse Diseases/epidemiology , Horse Diseases/microbiology , Hospitals, Animal , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Horses , Hospitals, Teaching , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Ohio/epidemiology , Seasons , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
4.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 13(6): 385-93, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23473222

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as an important zoonotic and nosocomial pathogen in veterinary settings. Even though human risk factors for MRSA infection and colonization are well known, this information in animals is lacking. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with MRSA carrier dogs on their arrival at a veterinary teaching hospital. A total of 435 dogs were enrolled in the MRSA active surveillance program at The Ohio State University-Veterinary Medical Center over a 1-year period. Dogs were screened for MRSA on arrival, regardless of health status, sex, breed, or age. In addition, an epidemiological survey and medical history were obtained for each dog to identify potential risk factors up to 1 year prior to the appointment. Of 435 dogs included in the study, 25 (5.7%) were MRSA positive, with 86.5% of the isolates classified staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type II and USA100. Four of the 25 MRSA carrier dogs were healthy, 20 had health issues unrelated to MRSA, and 1 had an active MRSA infection. MRSA was detected in the nares (72%, 18/25), skin lesions (24%, 6/25), and the perianal area (16%, 4/25). Except for previous surgery <90 days (odds ratio [OR]=4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-17.6; p value 0.01), none of the variables related to the previous medical history, dog's management, home environment, and other potential exposures were associated with the MRSA carrier status. However, the profession of the owner was significantly associated, and dogs owned by veterinary students were 20.5 times (95% CI 4.5-93.6; p value≤0.01) more likely to be MRSA positive than dogs owned by clients with different occupations. MRSA-positive dogs were dispersed in different categories, preventing the creation of an epidemiological profile that would allow their early recognition upon arrival to a veterinary hospital. However, the association between veterinary students with MRSA-positive dogs is a concern that deserves further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/veterinary , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Methicillin Resistance/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Animals , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Cross Infection , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Dogs , Female , Hospitals, Animal , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Occupations , Ohio/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Zoonoses
5.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 13(5): 299-311, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23473216

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is known to be present in small animal veterinary clinical environments. However, a better understanding of the ecology and dynamics of MRSA in these environments is necessary for the development of effective infectious disease prevention and control programs. To achieve this goal, a yearlong active MRSA surveillance program was established at The Ohio State University (OSU) Veterinary Medical Center to describe the spatial and molecular epidemiology of this bacterium in the small animal hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing, and dendrogram analysis were used to characterize and analyze the 81 environmental and 37 canine-origin MRSA isolates obtained during monthly sampling events. Overall, 13.5% of surfaces were contaminated with MRSA at 1 or more sampling times throughout the year. The majority of the environmental and canine isolates were SCCmec type II (93.8% and 86.5%, respectively) and USA100 (90.1% and 86.5%, respectively). By PFGE analysis, these isolates were found to be closely related, which reflects a low diversity of MRSA strains circulating in the hospital. For 5 consecutive months, 1 unique pulsotype was the most prevalent across the medical services and was recovered from a variety of surfaces and hospital locations. Carts/gurneys, doors, and examination tables/floors were the most frequently contaminated surfaces. Some surfaces maintained the same pulsotypes for 3 consecutive months. Molecular analysis found that incoming MRSA-positive dogs were capable of introducing a new pulsotype into the hospital environment during the surveillance period. Our results suggest that once a MRSA strain is introduced into the hospital environment, it can be maintained and spread for extended periods of time. These findings can aid in the development of biosecurity and biocontainment protocols aimed at reducing environmental contamination and potential exposures to MRSA in veterinary hospital staff, clients, and patients.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Hospitals, Animal , Hospitals, Teaching , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques/veterinary , Cross Infection/veterinary , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Dogs , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Environment , Equipment Contamination , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Molecular Epidemiology , Ohio/epidemiology , Penicillin-Binding Proteins , Phenotype , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
6.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 11(6): 609-15, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21417926

ABSTRACT

Concurrent to reports of zoonotic and nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in veterinary settings, recent evidence indicates that the environment in veterinary hospitals may be a potential source of MRSA. The present report is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of MRSA on specific human and animal contact surfaces at a large veterinary hospital during a nonoutbreak period. A total of 156 samples were collected using Swiffers(®) or premoistened swabs from the small animal, equine, and food animal sections. MRSA was isolated and identified by pre-enrichment culture and standard microbiology procedures, including growth on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with NaCl and oxacillin, and by detection of the mecA gene. Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile were also determined. MRSA was detected in 12% (19/157) of the hospital environments sampled. The prevalence of MRSA in the small animal, equine, and food animal areas were 16%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. Sixteen of the MRSA isolates from the small animal section were classified as USA100, SCCmec type II, two of which had pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern that does not conform to any known type. The one isolate obtained from the equine section was classified as USA500, SCCmec type IV. The molecular epidemiological analysis revealed a very diverse population of MRSA isolates circulating in the hospital; however, in some instances, multiple locations/surfaces, not directly associated, had the same MRSA clone. No significant difference was observed between animal and human contact surfaces in regard to prevalence and type of isolates. Surfaces touched by multiple people (doors) and patients (carts) were frequently contaminated with MRSA. The results from this study indicate that MRSA is present in the environment even during nonoutbreak periods. This study also identified specific surfaces in a veterinary environment that need to be targeted when designing and executing infection control programs.


Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Fomites/microbiology , Hospitals, Animal , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Students , Veterinarians
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...