Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 48(6): 461-469, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369289

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A training program was developed to increase general practitioners' engagement in the optimal management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in BPH management after the implementation of a training program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. Aggregated data were analyzed in three evaluation periods (2010, 2012 and 2015), addressing quality indicators for diagnosis, treatment, and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 118 795 patients who presented any data points were included. All quality indicators (number of IPSS and PSA determinations) increased between the first period and the last. Combination (α-blocker + 5-ARI) therapy was increasingly prescribed during the study periods whereas the proportion of prescriptions for single-agent α-blocker showed no significant differences among the periods analyzed. However, the total number of patients eligible for combination therapy who actually received this treatment was low in all periods (7.5%, 17.9%, and 20.1%, in 2010, 2012, and 2015, respectively). The outcome indicators revealed a decrease in referrals to the urology unit mostly among newly diagnosed patients. Even though the proportion of patients who underwent BPH-related surgeries increased significantly from the first to the second period, the number of surgeries remained stable between the second and third periods. CONCLUSIONS: The training program had a generally positive impact on the management of BPH patients in PC, but the overall study period may be insufficient to show an effect on some outcome indicators such as the number of surgeries.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Hyperplasia , Prostatic Hyperplasia/therapy , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Spain , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use
2.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 24(4): e438-e443, 2019 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to analyse the variables associated with the family care of people diagnosed with serious mental illness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out involving caregivers of people with serious mental illness (SMI) who were known to the mental health services in Valencia (España) and associations for those with SMI. The sample comprised 417 caregivers who completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Zarit Burden Interview. Bivariate analyses (t-test, analysis of variance and Pearson correlation) were performed, as was a multiple linear regression model. Values of p < .05 were considered significant. The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the ethics committees of the participating institutions. RESULTS: The statistical analyses showed significant associations between the sociodemographic and clinical variables of the caregivers and patients and the burden felt by caregivers of people with SMI. The importance of both formal and informal social support stands out as a protective factor against the consequences of the illness's impact on the main caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: The role of spaces of mutual support is crucial. The results suggest that family psychoeducational programmes should be created, applied and evaluated in all mental healthcare services so as to reinforce training in mental health matters and provide support and assessment to caregivers in order to ease their burden.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Caregivers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Risk Factors , Social Support
3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 67(9): 888-94, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23758484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delphi technique allows developing a multidisciplinary consensus to establish solutions. AIM: To identify barriers and solutions to improve control in patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2). METHODS: An observational study using the 2-round Delphi technique (June-August 2011). A panel of 108 experts in DM2 from medical and nursing fields (primary care providers and specialists) from different regions completed via email a questionnaire with 41 Likert statements and 9 scores for each one. Level of agreement was assessed using measures of central tendency and dispersion. We analysed commonalities/differences between the two groups (Kappa index and McNemar chi-square). RESULTS: Response rate: 65%. Degree of agreement: 63.4% (95% CI 48.7-78.1%) in medicine, and 78.1% (95% CI 65.4-90.8) in nursing (p > 0.05). Overall level of agreement: Kappa = 0.43, (χ(2) = 2.5 p > 0.05). Regarding non-compliance with therapy, it improves with: the information to the partner/family/caregiver, patient education degree in diabetes, patient motivation and ability to share and agree on decisions with the patient. Clinical inertia improves with: motivation degree of healthcare professionals and the calculation of cardiovascular risk; and gets worse with: the shortage of time in consultation, absence of data in medical record, border high limits measurements accepted as normal readings, lack of a treatment goals, lack of teamwork (Physician/Nurse), scarcity of resources and lack of alarm systems in the electronic medical record on goals to achieve. CONCLUSION: The participants achieved an agreement in interventions in non-therapeutic compliance and clinical inertia to improve DM2 control.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Medication Adherence , Professional Practice/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Failure
4.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 44(11): 651-658, nov. 2012. ilus, graf, mapa, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-106705

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Describir la producción científica internacional en el ámbito de la atención primaria en el período 1985-2004.DiseñoAnálisis bibliométrico. Emplazamiento: Base de datos Medline. Acceso mediante WebSPIRS versión 4,3. Se analizan 2 períodos: 2000-2004 (transversal) y 1985-2004 (evolutivo). Búsqueda basada en MesH Major con los descriptores: Primary Care o Primary Health Care, Family Practice, Physicians Family, Nurse Practitioners y los Entry Terms relacionados con ellos. Mediciones principales: Se analizaron los indicadores bibliométricos de producción, circulación, dispersión y visibilidad. Criterios de inclusión: se consideró aquel registro (documento citable) indexado en Medline. Se incluyeron documentos originales y revisiones. Resultados: En 2000-2004 se publicaron 20.911 artículos, el 0,73% de la producción total. Con una tasa de crecimiento (1985-2004) del 221%, 2,4 veces más que la media. La tasa de transitoriedad fue 83,17%. El idioma inglés es el predominante (88,81%) sobre 34 idiomas, siendo el español el siguiente (2,6%). Dieciséis países producen el 95,67% de los artículos. España ocupa el séptimo lugar. Las universidades (52%) son la institución más productiva. Existen 1.074 revistas diferentes siendo las 10 más productoras: Br J Gen Pract, Adv Nurse Pract, Aust Fam Physician, Fam Pract, Fam Med, BMJ, Aten Primaria, Health Serv J, Can Fam Physician, J Fam Pract. La proporción de ensayos clínicos (5,43%) en atención primaria (AP) es similar a la del resto de disciplinas y ha aumentado el 453% (1985-2004). Conclusiones: La producción de AP supone cerca del 1% del total de la producción científica, con un crecimiento notorio y mayor que la media en 20 años. La proporción de ensayos clínicos es similar a otras disciplinas. Aunque los países y revistas anglosajones son los más productores, España y la revista Aten Primaria se encuentra entre los destacados(AU)


Objective: To present an international view of the scientific production in the field of primary care in the period 1985-2004.DesignRetrospective, observational study. Bibliometric analysis. Location: Medline database. WebSPIRS access through version 4.3. We analysed two periods: 2000-2004 (cross-sectional) and 1985-2004 (developmental). Search based on "MeSH Major" with descriptors: Primary Care or Primary Health Care, Family Practice, Family Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Entry Terms associated with these. Key Measures: We analysed the bibliometric indicators of production, circulation, dispersion, and visibility. Results: In 2000-2004, published 20911 articles were published, 0.73% of total production. There was a growth rate (1985-2004) of 221%, which was 2.4 times more than average. Transience rate was 83.17%. The English language is predominant (88.81%) over 34 languages, with Spanish being the next (2.6%). Sixteen countries produce 95.67% of the articles. Spain occupies the 7th place. Universities (52%) are the most productive institutions. There are 1074 different journals with the 10 most productive being: Br J Gen Pract, Adv Nurse Pract, Aust Fam Physician, Fam Pract, Fam Med, BMJ, Aten Primary Health Serv J, Can Fam Physician, J Fam Pract. The proportion of trials (5.43%) in PC is similar to other disciplines and has increased by 453% (1985-2004). Conclusions: The production of Primary care is about 1% of the total scientific output, with a noticeable and higher than average growth over 20 years. The proportion of clinical trials is similar to other disciplines. Although Anglo-Saxon countries and journals are the highest producers, Spain and the journal Aten Primaria is among those highlighted(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Scientific Publication Indicators , Bibliometrics , Research/methods , Research/organization & administration , Research/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/trends , 28599 , MEDLINE/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/trends
6.
Aten Primaria ; 44(11): 651-8, 2012 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22296794

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present an international view of the scientific production in the field of primary care in the period 1985-2004. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. Bibliometric analysis. LOCATION: Medline database. WebSPIRS access through version 4.3. We analysed two periods: 2000-2004 (cross-sectional) and 1985-2004 (developmental). Search based on "MeSH Major" with descriptors: Primary Care or Primary Health Care, Family Practice, Family Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Entry Terms associated with these. KEY MEASURES: We analysed the bibliometric indicators of production, circulation, dispersion, and visibility. RESULTS: In 2000-2004, published 20911 articles were published, 0.73% of total production. There was a growth rate (1985-2004) of 221%, which was 2.4 times more than average. Transience rate was 83.17%. The English language is predominant (88.81%) over 34 languages, with Spanish being the next (2.6%). Sixteen countries produce 95.67% of the articles. Spain occupies the 7th place. Universities (52%) are the most productive institutions. There are 1074 different journals with the 10 most productive being: Br J Gen Pract, Adv Nurse Pract, Aust Fam Physician, Fam Pract, Fam Med, BMJ, Aten Primary Health Serv J, Can Fam Physician, J Fam Pract. The proportion of trials (5.43%) in PC is similar to other disciplines and has increased by 453% (1985-2004). CONCLUSIONS: The production of Primary care is about 1% of the total scientific output, with a noticeable and higher than average growth over 20 years. The proportion of clinical trials is similar to other disciplines. Although Anglo-Saxon countries and journals are the highest producers, Spain and the journal Aten Primaria is among those highlighted.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Internationality , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Language , MEDLINE/statistics & numerical data , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/trends
7.
Av. diabetol ; 26(5): 314-319, sept.-oct. 2010. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-87919

ABSTRACT

El paciente anciano con diabetes presenta una serie de características que deberemos tener en cuenta al plantear el tratamiento farmacológico, como son la calidad de vida, la presencia de complicaciones crónicas, los grandes síndromes geriátricos y las preferencias del paciente. La escasa evidencia disponible, debida a los pocos estudios realizados en ancianos, explica las limitadas recomendaciones existentes en la mayoría de las guías de práctica clínica actuales. Metformina es el fármaco de elección en monoterapia y su posología debe adaptarse al grado de insufi ciencia renal, situación muy frecuente en los ancianos. Otros grupos farmacológicos también pueden utilizarse teniendo en cuenta sus limitaciones y contraindicaciones. No existe consenso sobre cuál es el tratamiento combinado más indicado en los ancianos cuando fracasa la monoterapia. Cualquier combinación puede utilizarse siempre que se respeten las indicaciones y las contraindicaciones. Ante la necesidad de insulinización se deben valorar los benefi cios y riesgos del uso de insulina, utilizando la pauta más simple y adaptada a las características del anciano y su entorno (AU)


The elderly patient with diabetes presents a series of features that we need to have in mind when considering drug therapy, such as quality of life, presence of chronic complications, major geriatric syndromes, and patient preferences. The limited evidence available due to the few studies performed in the elderly explains the limited existing recommendations in the most current clinical practice guidelines. Metformin is the drug of choice as monotherapy and its dosage should be adjusted to the degree of renal failure, a situation very common in the elderly. Other pharmacologic groups can also be used taking into account their limitations and contraindications. There is no consensus on what is the most appropriate combination therapy in the elderly when monotherapy fails. Any combination can be used provided that the indications and contraindications are considered. When insulin is necessary, benefits and risks of using insulin should be evaluated, using the simplest regimen adapted to the characteristics of the elderly and its environment (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Polypharmacy
8.
Av. diabetol ; 26(4): 226-234, jul.-ago. 2010. tab, ilus, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-108389

ABSTRACT

Liraglutida es el primer an¨¢logo humano del p¨¦ptidosimilar al glucag¨®n tipo 1 (GLP-1) administrado unavez al d¨ªa, y con el que presenta una homolog¨ªa del97%. El f¨¢rmaco ha sido recientemente aprobadopor la European Medicines Agency y por la Food andDrug Administration para su uso en el tratamiento dela diabetes mellitus tipo 2. La aprobaci¨®n inicial espara su uso una vez al d¨ªa en combinaci¨®n, bien conmetformina o con una sulfonilurea, as¨ª como encombinaci¨®n con metformina m¨¢s una sulfonilurea ouna tiazolidindiona. En Estados Unidos, tambi¨¦n est¨¢indicada en monoterapia. Los resultados del programade estudios LEAD (Liraglutide Effect and Action inDiabetes) demuest ran que liraglutida disminuye deforma significativa la hemoglobina glucosilada(HbA1c) con muy bajo riesgo de hipoglucemia. El tratamientocon liraglutida tambi¨¦n se asocia con unap¨¦rdida de peso signifi cativa y mantenida en el tiempo,disminuci¨®n de la presi¨®n arterial sist¨®lica, mejor¨ªade la funci¨®n de las c¨¦lulas ¦Â y reducci¨®n deotros factores de riesgo cardiovascular. En este art¨ªculose revisa la evidencia m¨¢s actualizada obtenidadel programa LEAD, centr¨¢ndose en consideracionespr¨¢cticas sobre la manera de utilizar de forma ¨®ptimaesta nueva terapia para la diabetes mellitus tipo 2(AU)


Liraglutide is the first once daily human glucagonlikepeptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue, with a 97% homology.Liraglutide has recently been approved bythe European Medicines Agency and by the Foodand Drug Administration to be used in the medicalmanagement of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Initial approvalis for be using in combination with metformin,a sulphonylurea or a combination of metforminwith a sulphonylurea or thiazolidinedione. Monotherapywith liraglutide is also approved in UnitedStates. Results from the LEAD (Liraglutide Effectand Action in Diabetes) clinical trials programmeshow that liraglutide significantly lowers HbA1c, witha very low risk of hypoglycemia. Liraglutide treatmentwas also associated with significant and sustainedweight loss, decreased systolic blood pressure,improved ¦Â-cell function, and reductions inother cardiovascular risk markers. In this article wereview the most up-to-date evidence emanatingfrom the LEAD programme, focussing on practicalconsiderations on how to optimally use this new therapyfor type 2 diabetes mellitus(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/pharmacokinetics , Patient Selection , Patient Care Team/trends , Incretins , Glycemic Index , Weight Loss , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Risk Factors
9.
Rev Clin Esp ; 209(8): 371-81, 2009 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19775585

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the high prevalence of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) reported, little information is available about this disorder in Spain. The present study was conducted to obtain information on this condition from patients identified by a simple screening questionnaire and subsequent diagnostic confirmation by the Primary Care Practitioner (PCP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-stage, cross-sectional and retrospective (resource utilization), observational study in a sample of adult patients (2,047 subject) attending 10 outpatient Primary Care centers in Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia. A screening questionnaire containing the 4 RLS diagnostic criteria was used. Clinical assessment and RLS diagnosis confirmation was performed using a structured questionnaire. Other variables assessed were quality of life by SF-36 questionnaire scoring; sleep by the MOS sleep scale; symptom severity of RLS symptoms by the IRLS scales; health care resource utilization in the previous 12 months by completion of questionnaire following patient chart review. The diagnosis made by the PCP was confirmed in a small sample of patients by a neurologist expert in Movement Disorders. RESULTS: A total of 19.7% (404 out of 2,047) subjects positively answered the 4 diagnostic questions of the RLS screening questionnaire. Of these, 185 (9.0%) reported moderate to severe symptoms at least twice weekly. The PCP made a diagnosis of RLS in 79 of 154 patients completing the diagnostic interview. Thus, prevalence of RLS estimated in this adult population was 4.6%. The predictive value of the screening RLS questionnaire was 51.3%. Average age of symptom onset was 42 years (range: 20 - over 80 years). RLS symptoms were moderately (50.6%) or extremely (38%) distressing and 73.4% of RLS patients slept poorly at least two nights a week. This diagnosis represents 9.4% of all patients presenting to PCP and experiencing poor sleep. Mean score in the IRLS scale (0 - 40) was 19.4. Average score of SF-36 questionnaire (0-100) was 54.6, lower than the Spanish general reference population (61.4). About one third of the RLS patients had seen a physician because of RLS symptoms. However, a diagnosis was made in only 48% of these and only 5% the diagnosis was RLS. CONCLUSIONS: The DECODE RLS - Spain study shows that many patients with classical RLS symptoms frequently see their PCP without being adequately diagnosed and treated. Screening tools such as that used in this study may contribute to the detection of these patients.


Subject(s)
Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Restless Legs Syndrome/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 209(8): 371-381, sept. 2009. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-73080

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Pese a la elevada prevalencia del síndrome de piernas inquietas (SPI), se cuenta con escasa información sobre este trastorno en nuestro país. El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener información sobre este problema de salud a partir de pacientes identificados mediante un cuestionario de cribado y posterior confirmación diagnóstica por médicos de Atención Primaria (AP). Material y métodos: Estudio en tres etapas, transversal y retrospectivo (utilización de recursos), en una muestra de pacientes adultos (2.047 sujetos) que acudió a consultas ambulatorias de 10 centros de Atención Primaria (Madrid, Barcelona y Valencia). Se utilizó un cuestionario de detección con los 4 criterios diagnósticos de SPI. Se realizó la evaluación clínica y confirmación diagnóstica mediante un cuestionario estandarizado. Otras variables evaluadas fueron: calidad de vida, mediante la puntuación del Cuestionario SF-36 de salud; sueño, mediante la puntuación de la escala de sueño MOS; intensidad de los síntomas de SPI, mediante la puntuación de la escala IRLS; utilización de recursos sanitarios en los 12 meses previos. Confirmación del diagnóstico del médico de AP, por un neurólogo especialista en trastornos del movimiento en una muestra reducida aleatoria de pacientes. Resultados: Un 19,7% (404 de 2.047) de los sujetos respondió positivamente a las 4 preguntas diagnósticas del cuestionario de detección del SPI. De ellos, 185 sujetos (9,0%) presentaban síntomas por lo menos dos veces a la semana, de intensidad moderada a grave. El médico de AP confirmó el diagnóstico de SPI en 79 de los 154 pacientes que completaron la entrevista diagnóstica. La prevalencia en esta población adulta fue del 4,6%. El valor predictivo del cuestionario de detección del SPI fue de un 51,3%. La edad media de inicio de síntomas fue de 42 años (rango: 20-más de 80 años). Los síntomas de SPI fueron moderados en el 50,6% y graves en el 38%. El 73,4% de los pacientes con SPI dormía mal, al menos dos noches por semana. La puntuación media de la escala IRLS (0-40) fue de 19,4. La puntuación media del cuestionario SF-36 (0-100) fue de 54,6, más baja que la de la población española de referencia (61,4). Aproximadamente un tercio de los pacientes había consultado antes con un médico por los síntomas de SPI. No obstante, sólo un 48% contaba con un diagnóstico y sólo en un 5% éste era de SPI. Conclusiones: El estudio DECODE RSL indica que muchos pacientes con síntomas clásicos de SPI visitan frecuentemente a su médico de AP sin ser diagnosticados ni, por lo tanto, recibir un tratamiento adecuado. Herramientas como la utilizada en este estudio pueden ayudar a la detección de estos pacientes (AU)


Introduction: Despite the high prevalence of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) reported, little information is available about this disorder in Spain. The present study was conducted to obtain information on this condition from patients identified by a simple screening questionnaire and subsequent diagnostic confirmation by the Primary Care Practitioner (PCP). Materials and methods: Three-stage, cross-sectional and retrospective (resource utilization), observational study in a sample of adult patients (2,047 subject) attending 10 outpatient Primary Care centers in Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia. A screening questionnaire containing the 4 RLS diagnostic criteria was used. Clinical assessment and RLS diagnosis confirmation was performed using a structured questionnaire. Other variables assessed were quality of life by SF-36 questionnaire scoring; sleep by the MOS sleep scale; symptom severity of RLS symptoms by the IRLS scales; health care resource utilization in the previous 12 months by completion of questionnaire following patient chart review. The diagnosis made by the PCP was confirmed in a small sample of patients by a neurologist expert in Movement Disorders. Results: A total of 19.7% (404 out of 2,047) subjects positively answered the 4 diagnostic questions of the RLS screening questionnaire. Of these, 185 (9.0%) reported moderate to severe symptoms at least twice weekly. The PCP made a diagnosis of RLS in 79 of 154 patients completing the diagnostic interview. Thus, prevalence of RLS estimated in this adult population was 4.6%. The predictive value of the screening RLS questionnaire was 51.3%. Average age of symptom onset was 42 years (range: 20 - over 80 years). RLS symptoms were moderately (50.6%) or extremely (38%) distressing and 73.4% of RLS patients slept poorly at least two nights a week. This diagnosis represents 9.4% of all patients presenting to PCP and experiencing poor sleep. Mean score in the IRLS scale (0 - 40) was 19.4. Average score of SF-36 questionnaire (0-100) was 54.6, lower than the Spanish general reference population (61.4). About one third of the RLS patients had seen a physician because of RLS symptoms. However, a diagnosis was made in only 48% of these and only 5% the diagnosis was RLS. Conclusions: The DECODE RLS - Spain study shows that many patients with classical RLS symptoms frequently see their PCP without being adequately diagnosed and treated. Screening tools such as that used in this study may contribute to the detection of these patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Restless Legs Syndrome/diagnosis , Restless Legs Syndrome/epidemiology , Health Resources , Surveys and Questionnaires , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Primary Health Care
12.
Int J Clin Pract ; 61(6): 909-15, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17504353

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the level and factors affecting control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes (TYPE 2 DM) patients. Multicentre cross-sectional study: a sample of 430 primary care practices across Spain selected 1907 type 2 diabetic patients. The first five consecutive ambulatory patients with TYPE 2 DM were eligible for the inclusion into the survey. Patients were free of known cardiovascular disease (CVD). Control criteria were defined based on 2002 American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations. A total of 1907 patients (51% women) aged 63 +/- 9 years. Smoking prevalence was 22.6%, 50.6% had levels of A1c < 7%. Mean blood pressure (BP) was 148 +/- 17/86 +/- 10 mmHg. Only 7.8% have achieved the target of BP < 130/80 mmHg. Among the 1180 patients (65%) treated for hypertension, this target was attained in only 4.4% of patients. A measurement for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was available in 1669 patients (88%). Only 5.9% of patients achieved the target of LDL < 100 mg/dl. Among the 638 patients (41.6%) on drug treatment for dyslipidaemia, this target was attained in only 5.6% of patients. Among type 2 diabetic patients in Spain the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high. Control of glycaemia, smoking, BP and LDL are far from optimal despite the widespread use of guidelines for the management of diabetes and CVD. The application of published recommendations needs to be reinforced.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Diabetic Angiopathies/prevention & control , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Spain
14.
Hipertensión (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 21(3): 100-107, abr. 2004. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-31626

ABSTRACT

Propósito. La hipertensión arterial (HTA) sigue siendo un problema sanitario de primer orden por su alta prevalencia, morbimortalidad y alto coste económico, lo que hace necesario un método que permita una mejor gestión de la misma. Desde esta perspectiva hemos planteado un trabajo para la selección de los indicadores de calidad mínimos (ICM) para evaluar, controlar y seguir adecuadamente al paciente hipertenso y cuya supervisión permita evaluar la calidad asistencial que recibe la población hipertensa. Material y métodos. Tras definir el problema, revisar la bibliografía y consultar a expertos en hipertensión, la selección de indicadores se realizó a partir de las principales guías nacionales e internacionales de hipertensión. Para la selección de los ICM utilizamos tres criterios: cumplir requisitos que definen un indicador de calidad, concordancia entre guías y evidencia científica y actualización en función del año de aparición en guía. Resultados. Inicialmente obtuvimos 113 indicadores potenciales; de entre ellos seleccionamos 32 ICM que incluían elementos de anamnesis, exploración física, exploraciones complementarias y tratamiento (de primera visita y visita anual). Conclusiones. La intervención mediante la definición de ICM en HTA y la medición de la cumplimentación de los mismos debe ser el primer paso para el control del paciente hipertenso en Atención Primaria (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Primary Health Care/standards , Hypertension/therapy , Spain
18.
Aten Primaria ; 23(7): 411-8, 1999 Apr 30.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10363393

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To typify the episodes of early detection of cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) and to calculate their frequency by age and sex groups. DESIGN: An observational, prospective and multi-centred study. SETTING: Twenty health centres distributed in the three provinces of the Community of Valencia. PATIENTS: Episodes of prevention of CRF in users of both sexes aged between 18 and 64 who, in the three years prior to the study, had undergone no CRF early diagnosis protocol. They were included by means of consecutive proposal with informed consent. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The diagnostic protocol of the Plan for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases (PPCVD) was applied. The variables analysed were: age, sex, number and duration of consultations, CRF diagnosed previously, and CRF diagnosed at the intervention. 632 episodes were analysed, with a mean 1.44 (CI: 1.39-1.49) consultations per episode and a mean duration of 10 minutes 53 seconds. At the start of the study 60.3% of the population did not have CRF, but after the intervention only 17.2% had no CRF diagnosed. CRF frequency after the intervention was: diabetes 4.5% (CI: 3.2-12.2), alcohol consumption 5.5% (CI: 2.2-13.1), hypertension 14.9% (CI: 7.7-22.2), obesity 30.8% (CI: 24.3-37.3), tobacco habit 33.2% (CI: 26.8-39.6), lipaemia 42.5% (CI: 36.6-48.5), and sedentary life-style 54.9% (CI: 49.6-60.2). CONCLUSIONS: CRF diagnosed most often after the intervention were: sedentary life-style, tobacco habit and obesity; and the least commonly diagnosed was alcohol consumption. The application of the PPCVD protocol was most effective in the youngest age-groups and women. The "episode" as a unit of analysis is a useful and feasible instrument for investigating the procedures and results of primary care preventive activities.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Spain
19.
Aten Primaria ; 22(8): 497-504, 1998 Nov 15.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9866257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To find the control degree of a population of hypertension patients. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of health services. SETTING: EAP Salvador Pau. Valencia (Spain). PATIENTS: 200 patients diagnosed of hypertension included in the health center file. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Items studied were age, sex, diagnosis and program inclusion year, number of visits, other explorations and its cost, TAS and TAD, drugs and its cost, personnel cost. We established different well control levels and we obtained the cost of each of them. Twenty six point five per cent of patients had TA values below 140/90 mmHg; Sixty four point five per cent had values below 160/90 mmHg. And sixty six point nine had values below 90 mmHg. Monthly medium cost per patient was 3242 pts. Monthly medium cost per patient well controlled was 12234 pts. CONCLUSIONS: Only a third of our patients are well controlled according the current standards. Efficiency decreases noteworthy when control levels are lower.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/economics , Hypertension/prevention & control , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Health Personnel/economics , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Time Factors
20.
Aten Primaria ; 21(8): 517-21, 1998 May 15.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9670578

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To find the effectiveness of short-term eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori in the duodenal ulcer. DESIGN: Intervention study, open controlled, randomised with parallel groups. SETTING: Three Health Centres in the city of Valencia. PATIENTS: Patients with a duodenal ulcer diagnosis and a Helicobacter pylori infection who attended the Primary Care physician. INTERVENTION: The study group (48 patients) was treated for six days with the triple therapy: Amoxycillin, Clarithromycin and Omeprazole. The control group (40 patients) was treated with Omeprazole for six weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The observance period lasted a year, after which the Elisa test was conducted. Eradication was successful for 65% of those treated with the triple therapy, but for only 30% of those treated with monotherapy. The consumption of medication for the ulcer during the year of observance was almost three times greater in the group treated with monotherapy than in the triple-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Eradicative triple therapy was shown to be more effective and efficient than monotherapy. It is feasible to use it in Primary Care. Eradicative triple therapy is not advisable within six days: a longer treatment period should be employed with this recommendable therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination/therapeutic use , Duodenal Ulcer/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Adult , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Duodenal Ulcer/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...