Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Enferm. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 27(3): 144-152, mayo-jun. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-163211

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Analizar la evolución de la producción científica en una institución de asistencia pública concertada con gestión privada, y conocer la percepción de los profesionales de atención primaria sobre la investigación. MÉTODO: La entidad engloba un hospital universitario y 10 centros de salud, 673 médicos y 747 enfermeras. Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica. Se diseñó un cuestionario, con 5 secciones (datos sociodemográficos, competencias, necesidades, motivación y satisfacción hacia la investigación) y 40 variables (escala, 1-10), para que fuese autocumplimentado por los profesionales de atención primaria. Se analizó su comprensión, pertinencia y validez de contenido. RESULTADOS: En 2014, la contribución de la atención primaria a la investigación global representó el 2,8% del total de factor de impacto de las publicaciones y el 4,8% de los ensayos clínicos. Las enfermeras contribuyeron con el 0,6% del factor de impacto, con publicaciones en revistas del primer cuartil. Participaron en la encuesta 110 (51%) profesionales de atención primaria. La motivación media hacia la investigación fue de 7,85 puntos y la satisfacción con ella de 4,37 puntos. Destacó el interés por recibir formación en investigación (8,46 puntos) y la falta de liderazgo en esta (2,93 puntos).como competencia destacó la investigación en equipo (6,87 puntos) y negativamente la obtención de financiación (3,44 puntos). CONCLUSIONES: La investigación aumenta en la institución, especialmente en el hospital. Los profesionales de atención primaria manifestaron motivación hacia la investigación e insatisfacción por sus dificultades y falta de recursos para investigar


OBJECTIVE: To analyze the evolution of scientific production in a privately managed public institution, and to explore the perceptions of primary healthcare professionals with regard to research. Method : The institution includes a university hospital and 10 primary health centres, 673 physicians, and 747 nurses. A bibliometric analysis on scientific production was performed. A questionnaire was designed, with 5 sections (sociodemographic data, competences, needs, motivation and satisfaction s with research) and 40 items (scale of 1-10). Its understanding, pertinence and validity of content were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2014, the contribution of primary care to research accounted for 2.8% of the total impact factor of publications, and 4.8% of clinical trials. Nurses accounted for 0.6% of the impact factor, having published articles in first quartile journals. A total of 110(51%) primary care professionals participated in the survey. The average motivation for research was 7.85 points and satisfaction with research 4.37 points. The interest in receiving training in research (8.46 points) was highlighted as well as the lack of leadership in research (2.93 points). Regarding competences, research in teams was highlighted (6.87 points), and obtaining funding was noted as a negative (3.44 points). CONCLUSIONS: Research is experiencing a surge in all institutions, especially in hospitals. The primary care professionals expressed their motivation towards research and their dissatisfaction with the difficulties encountered, especially in obtaining funds


Subject(s)
Humans , Research Financing , Clinical Nursing Research/trends , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research , Scientific Publication Indicators , Primary Health Care/trends , 50088 , Motivation , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data
2.
Enferm Clin ; 27(3): 144-152, 2017.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28434929

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the evolution of scientific production in a privately managed public institution, and to explore the perceptions of primary healthcare professionals with regard to research. METHOD: The institution includes a university hospital and 10 primary health centres, 673 physicians, and 747 nurses. A bibliometric analysis on scientific production was performed. A questionnaire was designed, with 5 sections (sociodemographic data, competences, needs, motivation and satisfaction s with research) and 40 items (scale of 1-10). Its understanding, pertinence and validity of content were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2014, the contribution of primary care to research accounted for 2.8% of the total impact factor of publications, and 4.8% of clinical trials. Nurses accounted for 0.6% of the impact factor, having published articles in first quartile journals. A total of 110(51%) primary care professionals participated in the survey. The average motivation for research was 7.85 points and satisfaction with research 4.37 points. The interest in receiving training in research (8.46 points) was highlighted as well as the lack of leadership in research (2.93 points). Regarding competences, research in teams was highlighted (6.87 points), and obtaining funding was noted as a negative (3.44 points). CONCLUSIONS: Research is experiencing a surge in all institutions, especially in hospitals. The primary care professionals expressed their motivation towards research and their dissatisfaction with the difficulties encountered, especially in obtaining funds.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Primary Health Care , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Bibliometrics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...