Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 18(2): 295-301, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21801704

ABSTRACT

Intravenous (i.v.) busulfan (Bu) administered once daily in myeloablative transplant regimens is convenient, effective, and relatively well tolerated. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended as nonrelapse mortality increases when daily exposure, as determined by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), exceeds 6000 µM·min. We describe sequential studies to achieve accurate prediction of treatment doses of Bu based on the kinetics of a smaller test dose. A total of 335 patients with hematologic malignancies were given daily i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg × 4 and fludarabine 50 mg/m(2) × 5. Pharmacokinetic monitoring was conducted for both the test dose and first treatment dose of Bu (day -5). Three different test dose schedules were evaluated: 12 mg Bu administered over 20 minutes, 0.8 mg/kg over 3 hours, and 0.8 mg/kg infused at 80 mg/h. The 3.2 mg/kg treatment doses were infused over a fixed time of 3 hours for the first 2 test dose trials and at a fixed rate of 80 mg/h for the final protocol. All test dose infusions were on day -7. In the first 2 schedules, Bu administered over a fixed time had significantly higher clearance for the test dose compared with the treatment dose. However, when both the test and the treatment doses were administered at the same infusion rate, clearance of the drug between the 2 dosing days was equivalent. Predicted day -5 AUC (AUC(-5)) showed a high linear correlation (r(2) = 0.74) to the actual AUC(-5). The error of these predictions was <20% in 98% of patients and <10% in 80%. In 24 individuals, the test dose predicted an AUC >5500 µM·min; therefore, the first Bu treatment dose was reduced to a desired target AUC. All adjusted doses fell within 20% of the targeted exposure. We conclude that a test dose strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring of daily i.v. Bu is accurate if the test and treatment doses are infused at the same rate. This approach allows targeting of therapeutic doses of Bu to desired levels and the potential for improved safety and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Monitoring, Physiologic , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Myeloablative Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Busulfan/adverse effects , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/adverse effects , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 14(2): 220-8, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18215782

ABSTRACT

Low plasma busulfan (Bu) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is associated with graft failure and relapsed leukemias, and high AUC with toxicities when Bu is used orally or i.v. 4 times daily combined with cyclophosphamide in myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) conditioning regimens. We report Bu AUC and its association with clinical outcomes in 130 patients with hematologic malignancies given a once-daily i.v. Bu (3.2 mg/kg days -5 to -2) and fludarabine (Flu, 50 mg/m(2) days -6 to -2) regimen. Total-body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy x 2 was added for 51 patients with acute leukemias. Plasma AUC varied 3.6-fold (2184-7794 microM.min, median 4699 microM.min). Patients with an AUC >6000 microM.min had lower overall survival (OS) than those with AUC < or =6000 microM.min at 12 months (38% versus 74%) and 36 months (23% versus 68%, P < .001). This effect was apparent in patients with standard-risk and high-risk disease, and persisted when potential confounders were considered (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7-6.3). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days (6% versus 19%) and progression free survival (PFS; 58% versus 16%) at 3 years were better with AUC < or =6000 microM.min. These data support a role for therapeutic dose monitoring and dose adjustment with daily i.v. busulfan.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Area Under Curve , Busulfan/toxicity , Drug Monitoring/methods , Graft Survival , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Whole-Body Irradiation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...