Transfusion of non-red blood cell blood products does not reduce survival following cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The literature supports the assertion that patients undergoing cardiac surgery who receive perioperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions have increased associated mortality. The aim of the current study is to assess whether there is an association between non-pRBC blood product transfusions and increased mortality. METHODS: Data from our center's Society of Thoracic Surgeons database included patients who underwent cardiac surgery from 2010 to 2018. Patients with pRBC transfusions or circulatory arrest were excluded. Propensity matching was performed (1:1; caliper = 0.2 times the standard deviation of logit of propensity score). Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression were used. Cardiac transplant, ventricular assist devices, transcatheter aortic valves, and patients who had experienced circulatory arrest were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8042 patients met criteria for analysis. Following propensity matching (1:1), 395 patients requiring perioperative non-pRBC blood products (platelets, fresh-frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate) were matched with 395 nontransfusion patients, yielding equitable patient cohorts. Median follow-up was 4.5 (3.0-6.4) years. Patients received platelets (327 [82.8%]), fresh-frozen plasma (141 [35.7%]), and cryoprecipitate (60 [15.2%]). There was no significant difference in the postoperative mortality (6 [1.5%] vs 4 [1.0%]; P = .52). Reoperation (20 [5.0%] vs 8 [2.0%]; P < .02) and prolonged ventilation (36 [9.1%] vs 19 [4.8%]; P < .02) were greater in the transfusion group. Emergent operation (odds ratio [OR] 2.86 [1.72-4.78]; P < .001), intra-aortic balloon pump (OR 3.24 [1.64-6.39]; P < .001), and multivalve operation (OR 4.34 [2.83-6.67]; P < .001) were significantly associated with blood product use. Blood product transfusion (hazard ratio; 1.15 [0.89-1.48]; P = .3) was not significantly associated with increased mortality risk. There was no significant long-term survival difference between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo cardiac surgery requiring blood products alone, without pRBC transfusion, have similar postoperative and long-term survival compared with patients not requiring blood products. These data are based on a limited patient sample, and future studies will aid in improving the generalizability of these results.

Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Preventing Stroke After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative stroke after cardiac surgical procedures carries significant morbidity. Dual intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory-evoked potentials detects cerebral hypoperfusion and predicts postoperative stroke in noncardiac procedures. We further evaluated preoperative risk factors and intraoperative neuromonitoring ability to predict postoperative stroke after cardiac operations. METHODS: All patients who underwent cardiac operations with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring from 2009 to 2020 at a single academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with circulatory arrest were excluded. Risks factors analyzed were sex, age, tobacco use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, prior cerebrovascular accident, cerebrovascular disease, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, abnormal somatosensory-evoked potentials and EEG baselines, and significant somatosensory-evoked potentials and EEG change as well as their permanence. Patients were divided into 2 groups by 30-day postoperative stroke occurrence. Univariate and multivariate logistical regressions were used for postoperative stroke significant predictors, and Kaplan-Meier curves estimated survival. RESULTS: The study included 620 patients (67.6% men), mean age 65.1 ± 14.1 years, with stroke in 5.32%. In univariate analysis, diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.62) and permanence of EEG change (OR, 5.35) were each associated with increased postoperative stroke odds. In multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR, 2.64) and permanent EEG change (OR, 4.22) were independently significantly associated with postoperative stroke. Overall survival was significantly better for patients with no intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring changes (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Permanent EEG change and diabetes were significant postoperative stroke predictors in cardiac operations. Furthermore, overall survival out to 10 years postoperatively was significantly higher in the group without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring changes, emphasizing its important predictive role.

Outcomes of reoperative aortic root surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the impact of reoperative aortic root replacement on short-term outcomes and survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of aortic root operations from 2010 to 2018. All patients with a complete aortic root replacement were included, and patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacements were excluded. Patients were dichotomized by first-time sternotomy versus redo sternotomy, which was defined as having had a prior sternotomy for whatever reason. Within the redo sternotomy group, reoperative aortic root replacements were identified, being defined as a complete aortic root replacement in patients with a prior aortic root replacement; 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity matching was used to compare outcomes across groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated and compared using log-rank statistics. RESULTS: A total of 893 patients undergoing complete ARR were identified, of whom 595 (67%) underwent first-time sternotomy and 298 (33%) underwent redo sternotomy. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and redo sternotomy groups, including operative mortality. Redo sternotomy was not associated with reduced survival after aortic root replacement compared with first-time sternotomy (P = .084), with 5-year survival of 73.7% for first-time sternotomy and 72.9% for redo sternotomy. In the redo sternotomy group (n = 298), 69 (23%) were reoperative aortic root replacements and 229 (77%) were first-time aortic root replacements. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and reoperative aortic root replacement groups, including operative mortality. Reoperative aortic root replacement was not associated with reduced survival, compared with first-time aortic root replacement (P = .870), with 5-year survival of 67.9% for first-time aortic root replacement and 72.1% for reoperative aortic root replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative aortic root replacement can be performed safely and provides similar survival to first-time aortic root replacement.

Complete revascularization during coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with reduced major adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: Complete revascularization literature is limited by variance in patient cohorts and inconsistent definitions. The objective of the current study was to provide risk-adjusted outcomes for complete revascularization of significant nonmain-branch and main-branch vessel stenoses. METHODS: All patients that underwent first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were included. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, cumulative incidence function, and Cox regression were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: The total population consisted of 3356 patients that underwent first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight hundred eighty-nine (26.5%) patients had incomplete and 2467 (73.5%) had complete revascularization. For main-branch vessels, 677 (20.2%) patients had incomplete revascularization and 2679 (79.8%) were completely revascularized. Following risk adjustment with inverse probability treatment weighting, all baseline characteristics were balanced (standardized mean difference, ≤ 0.10). On Kaplan-Meier estimates, survival at 1 year (94.6% vs 92.5%) and 5 years (86.5% vs 82.1%) (P = .05) was significantly better for patients who received complete revascularization. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher for the complete revascularization cohort at both 1 year (89.2% vs 84.2%) and 5 years (72.5% vs 66.7%) (P < .001). Complete revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.95; P = .01) was independently associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Incomplete revascularization of nonmain-branch vessels was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.8; P = .55) or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.24; P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical revascularization of all angiographically stenotic vessels in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with fewer major adverse events. Incomplete revascularization of nonmain-branch vessels is not associated with survival or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

The use of blood and blood products in aortic surgery is associated with adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term outcomes after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with or without perioperative blood or blood products. METHODS: All patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery with DHCA from 2011 to 2018 were propensity matched according to baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included short- and long-term mortality. Stratified Cox regression analysis was performed for significant associations with survival. RESULTS: A total of 824 patients underwent aortic replacement requiring circulatory arrest. After matching, there were 224 patients in each arm (transfusion and no transfusion). All baseline characteristics were well matched, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.1. Preoperative hematocrit (41.0 vs 40.6; SMD = 0.05) and ejection fraction (57.5% vs 57.0%; SMD = 0.08) were similar between the no transfusion and blood product transfusion cohorts. Rate of aortic dissection (42.9% vs 45.1%; SMD = 0.05), hemiarch replacement (70.1% vs 70.1%; SMD = 0.00), and total arch replacement (21.9% vs 23.2%; SMD = 0.03) were not statistically different. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time were higher in the blood product transfusion cohort (P < .001). Operative mortality (9.4% vs 2.7%; P = .003), stroke (7.6% vs 1.3%; P = .001), reoperation rate, pneumonia, prolonged ventilation, and dialysis requirements were significantly higher in the transfusion cohort (P < .001). In stratified Cox regression, transfusion was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 2.62 [confidence interval, 1.47-4.67]; P = .001). One- and 5-year survival were significantly reduced for the transfusion cohort (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent aortic surgery with DHCA, perioperative transfusions were associated with poor outcomes despite matching for preoperative baseline characteristics.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during aortic arch surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) during aortic arch reconstruction with hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) to predict early (<48 hours) adverse neurologic events (ANE; stroke or transient ischemic attack) and operative mortality. METHODS: This was an observational study of aortic arch surgeries requiring HCA from 2010 to 2018. Patients were monitored with electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared according to presence or absence of IONM changes, which were defined as any acute variation in SSEP or EEG, compared with baseline. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of IONM changes with operative mortality and early ANE. RESULTS: A total of 563 patients underwent aortic arch reconstruction with HCA and IONM. Of these, 119 (21.1%) patients had an IONM change, whereas 444 (78.9%) did not. Patients with IONM changes had increased operative mortality (22.7% vs 4.3%) and increased early ANE (10.9% vs 2.9%). In multivariable analysis, SSEP changes were correlated with early ANE (odds ratio [OR], 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-14.56; P = .008), whereas EEG changes were not (P = .532). Permanent SSEP changes were correlated with early ANE (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.51-13.77; P = .007), whereas temperature-related SSEP changes were not (P = .997). Finally, any IONM change (either SSEP or EEG) was correlated with operative mortality (OR, 5.82; 95% CI, 2.72-12.49; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal IONM events during aortic arch reconstruction with HCA portend worse neurologic outcomes and operative mortality and have a negative predictive value of 97.1%. SSEP might be more sensitive than EEG for predicting early ANE, especially when SSEP changes are permanent.

Long-term outcomes of hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to report outcomes of hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion, and secondarily, to report outcomes of this operative approach by type of underlying aortic disease. METHODS: This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2018. All patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with retrograde cerebral perfusion were included, whereas patients undergoing partial or total arch replacement or concomitant elephant trunk procedures were excluded. Patients were dichotomized into 2 groups by underlying aortic disease; that is, acute aortic dissection (AAD) or aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta. These groups were analyzed for differences in short-term postoperative outcomes, including stroke and operative mortality (Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition). Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify variables associated with long-term survival after hemiarch replacement. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients undergoing hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest plus retrograde cerebral perfusion were identified, of whom 53.0% had aneurysmal disease and 47.0% had AAD. For the entire cohort, operative mortality was 6.4%, whereas stroke occurred in 4.6% of patients. Comparing AAD with aneurysm, operative mortality and stroke rates were similar across each group. Five-year survival was 84.4% ± 0.02% for the entire hemiarch cohort, whereas 5-year survival was 88.0% ± 0.02% for the aneurysm subgroup and was 80.5% ± 0.03% for the AAD subgroup. On multivariable analysis, AAD was not associated with an increased hazard of death, compared with aneurysm (P = .790). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality after hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest plus retrograde cerebral perfusion are acceptably low, and this operative approach may be as advantageous for AAD as it is for aneurysm.

The long-term impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The literature has reported worse in-hospital outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of the following study is to provide detailed results on the long-term impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on survival and hospital readmission in cardiac surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing open cardiac surgery were reviewed with the exclusion of preoperative atrial fibrillation or patients undergoing ventricular assist device, transplant, or Cox-Maze procedures. Propensity matching (1:1) was performed to ensure similar baseline characteristics. Multivariable analysis identified significant associations with mortality and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 12,227 patients with cardiac disease were divided into 7927 patients (64.8%) without postoperative atrial fibrillation and 4300 patients (35.2%) with new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. Propensity matching (1:1) yielded 4275 risk-adjusted pairs. There was no difference between the nonpostoperative atrial fibrillation versus postoperative atrial fibrillation cohorts regarding operative mortality (4.61% vs 4.12%; P = .26) and stroke (2.32% vs 2.76%; P = .191). Patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation had higher rates of reoperation (12.12% vs 6.83%; P < .001), transfusion (43.42% vs 36.94%; P < .001), sepsis (1.99% vs 0.80%; P < .001), prolonged ventilation (15.88% vs 9.24% vs; P < .001), pneumonia (6.60% vs 2.36%; P < .001), renal failure (6.90% vs 3.37%; P < .001), and dialysis (4.94% vs 2.08%; P < .001). The postoperative atrial fibrillation cohort had a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation on follow-up (11.74% vs 4.75%; P < .001). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.21; 1.12-1.33; P < .001), all-cause readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.05; 1.01-1.1; P = .010), and heart failure-specific readmission (hazard ratio, 1.14; 1.04-1.26; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the postoperative atrial fibrillation cohort had worse perioperative morbidity, lower survival, and more readmissions for heart failure on long-term follow-up.

Coronary Artery Bypass With Multiarterial Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Data comparing patients who undergo multiarterial grafting during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary disease are scarce. This study addresses the relevance of using multiple arterial conduits vs PCI for appropriate patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CABG with multiple arterial conduits or PCI. Propensity score matching was performed for baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates, cumulative incidence, and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) curves were performed. RESULTS: The total patient population consisted of 3648 patients from 2011 to 2018 divided into 902 CABG patients and 2746 PCI patients. Patients were propensity matched (PCI, n = 838; CABG, n = 838). In the CABG cohort the left internal mammary artery was used in 837 patients (99.9%), the right internal mammary artery in 770 patients (92%), and radial arteries in 108 patients (12.9%). Patients in the PCI cohort had significantly higher 30-day mortality (24 [2.9%] vs 7 [0.8%], P < .01). Survival over follow-up (median, 4.9 years; range, 3.3-6.8) was better for the CABG cohort (730 [87.1%] vs 625 [74.6%], P < .01). Patients in the CABG cohort had greater freedom from MACCE (607 [72.4%] vs 339 [40.5%], P < .01). Cox multivariable regression showed that patients who underwent CABG had a significantly reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.61; P < .01) and of MACCE (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.38; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with coronary artery disease who undergo CABG with multiple arterial conduits have significantly fewer major adverse events, improved survival, and reduced hospital readmissions.

Impact of Aortic Root Enlargement on Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Aortic root enlargement (ARE) can be an important adjunct for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study compared outcomes of AVR with or without ARE. METHODS: This was an observational study using an institutional database of AVRs from 2010 to 2020 comparing patients who underwent isolated AVR vs AVR with ARE (AVR+ARE). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and Cox regression were performed. RESULTS: Of 2371 patients, 2240 (94.5%) underwent isolated AVR and 131 (5.5%) underwent AVR+ARE. Patients who underwent AVR+ARE were more likely to be women and to be younger than those who underwent isolated AVR. Prosthesis size was smaller in patients undergoing AVR+ARE (23 mm [interquartile range {IQR}, 21-25] vs 25 mm [IQR, 23-25], P < .001), but indexed effective orifice area did not differ between the 2 groups. Operative mortality was comparable for AVR (2.3%) and AVR+ARE (3.8%, P = .28). Patients who underwent AVR+ARE had a longer length of stay (7 days [IQR, 6-13] vs 6 days [IQR 5-10], P < .001), were more likely to have acute kidney injury (6.1% vs 2.5%, P = .01), were more likely to require blood product transfusions (40.5% vs 27.6%, P < .001), and were more likely to require prolonged ventilation > 24 hours (16.0% vs 6.8%, P < .001). Rates of stroke, atrial fibrillation, permanent pacemaker, and reoperation were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were similar, and on multivariable regression AVR+ARE was not associated with an increased hazard of death as compared with AVR (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.46; P = .59). CONCLUSIONS: ARE can be safely performed with isolated AVR and should be considered for patients with small annuli to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Sex-based outcomes after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: While prior data have suggested worse outcomes in women after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair when compared to men, results have been inconsistent across studies over time. This study sought to evaluate the impact of sex on short- and long-term outcomes after ATAAD repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing an institutional database of ATAAD repairs from 2007 to 2021. Patients were stratified according to sex. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression were performed. Supplementary analysis using propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 601 patients who underwent ATAAD repair, 361 were males (60.1%) and 240 (39.9%) were females. Females were significantly older, more likely to have hypertension, and more likely to have chronic lung disease. Females were also significantly more likely than males to undergo hemiarch replacement, while males were significantly more likely than females to undergo total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk. Operative mortality was 9.4% among males and 13.8% among females, though this was not a statistically significant difference (p = .098). Postoperative complications were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were similar for men and women, and, on multivariable Cox regression, sex was not significantly associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.37, p = .986). Outcomes remained comparable after supplementary propensity score matched analysis. CONCLUSION: ATAAD repair can be performed with comparable short-term and long-term outcomes in both men and women.

The impact of prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute type A aortic dissection repair.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type A aortic dissection have increased resource use. The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between prolonged mechanical ventilation and longitudinal survival in patients undergoing type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with type A aortic dissection undergoing repair from 2010 to 2018; Kaplan-Meier function and adjusted Cox regression analysis were used to compare in-hospital mortality and longitudinal survival accounting for time on mechanical ventilatory support. RESULTS: A total of 552 patients were included. The study population was divided into 12 hours or less (n = 291), more than 12 to 24 or less hours (n = 101), more than 24 to 48 hours or less (n = 60), and more than 48 hours (n = 100) groups. Patients within the 12 or less hours group were the youngest (60.0 vs 63.5 years vs 63.6 vs 62.8 years; P = .03) and less likely to be female (31.6% vs 43.6% vs 46.7% vs 56.0%; P < .001). On the other hand, the more than 48 hours group presented with malperfusion syndrome at admission more often (24.4% vs 29.7% vs 28.3% vs 53.0%; P < .001) and had longer cardiopulmonary and ischemic times (P < .05). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the more than 48 hours group (5.2% vs 6.9% vs 3.3% vs 30.0%; P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated worse longitudinal survival for the 24 to 48 hours group (hazard ratio, 1.94, confidence interval, 1.10-3.43) and more than 48 hours ventilation group (hazard ratio, 2.25, confidence interval, 1.30-3.92). CONCLUSIONS: The need for prolonged mechanical ventilatory support is prevalent and associated with other perioperative complications. More important, after adjusting for other covariates, prolonged mechanical ventilation is an independent factor associated with increased longitudinal mortality.

Preservation versus replacement of the aortic root for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of aortic root preservation versus aortic root replacement (ARR) after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. METHODS: In this observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries between 2007 and 2021, patients with ATAAD were identified via a prospectively maintained institutional database and were stratified by root preservation versus ARR (including valve-sparing and complete ARR). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Among the 601 patients underwent aortic arch reconstruction for ATAAD, 370 (61.6%) underwent root preservation and the other 231 (38.4%) underwent ARR, with a median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range, 3.8-9.6 years). Cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were longer in the ARR group, but intraoperative variables were otherwise similar between the groups, including cannulation strategy and extent of distal repair. There were no between-group differences in postoperative outcomes, including operative mortality, stroke, mechanical ventilation time, renal failure, reexploration for bleeding, and total length of stay. At a 1-year follow-up, the incidence of aortic regurgitation (moderate or greater) was similar in the 2 groups. On multivariable Cox regression, ARR was not associated with improved long-term survival compared with root preservation (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.56; P = .44). Late reinterventions on the aortic root or valve were similar in the 2 groups and was 2.0% for the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that aortic root preservation may achieve similar midterm outcomes as ARR after ATAAD repair.

Outcomes of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the impact of malperfusion syndrome on in-hospital mortality and midterm survival after emergency aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2018. All patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing open aortic arch reconstruction were included. Patients were dichotomized by the presence or absence of malperfusion syndrome and were analyzed for differences in short-term postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox analysis were performed to identify variables associated with survival. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients undergoing aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection were identified, of whom 332 (71.1%) presented without malperfusion syndrome and 135 (28.9%) presented with malperfusion syndrome. Patients with malperfusion syndrome had higher in-hospital mortality (21.5% vs 5.7%) than patients without malperfusion syndrome. After multivariable adjustment, malperfusion syndrome was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio, 2.43, 95% confidence interval, 1.61-3.66, P < .001) compared with patients without malperfusion syndrome. The predicted risk of mortality increased as the number of malperfused vascular beds increased. Patients with coronary malperfusion syndrome and neuro-malperfusion syndrome had reduced survival compared with the rest of the cohort (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Malperfusion syndrome is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and reduced survival for patients with acute type A aortic dissection, with the risk of mortality increasing as the number of malperfused vascular beds increases. Coronary malperfusion syndrome and neuro-malperfusion syndrome may represent a high-risk subgroup of patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome. Finally, malperfusion syndrome may benefit from immediate surgical intervention to restore true lumen perfusion, as opposed to operative delay.

Central versus peripheral cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the impact of central aortic versus peripheral cannulation on outcomes after acute type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: This was an observational study using an institutional database of acute type A aortic dissection repairs from 2007 to 2021. Patients were stratified according to central, subclavian, or femoral cannulation. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression were performed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 577 patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair. Of these, central cannulation was used in 490 patients (84.9%), subclavian cannulation was used in 54 patients (9.4%), and femoral cannulation was used in 33 patients (5.7%). Rates of peripheral vascular disease, aortic insufficiency moderate or greater, and cerebral malperfusion differed significantly among the groups, but baseline characteristics were otherwise comparable (P > .05). Operative mortality was lowest in the central cannulation group (9.8%), but this did not differ significantly among the groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were similar among the groups. On multivariable Cox regression, cannulation strategy was not significantly associated with long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissection repair can be safely performed through central aortic cannulation, with outcomes comparable to those obtained with subclavian or femoral cannulation.

Cerebral protection using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for aortic hemiarch reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: With evolutions in technique, recent data encourage the use of cerebral perfusion during aortic arch repair. However, a randomized data have demonstrated higher rates of neurologic injury according to MRI lesions using antegrade cerebral perfusion during hemiarch reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of two institutional aortic center databases to identify adult patients who underwent aortic hemiarch reconstruction for elective aortic aneurysm or acute type A aortic dissection. Patients were stratified according to cerebral protection method: (1) deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) group versus (2) DHCA/retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) group. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients and 245 patients underwent hemiarch reconstruction for aortic aneurysm electively and aortic dissection, respectively. In aneurysmal pathology, the DHCA group included 133 patients and the DHCA/RCP group included 187 patients. Operative mortality was 0.8% in the DHCA group and 2.7% in the DHCA/RCP group (p = 0.41). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates revealed comparable 2-year survival (p = 0.14). In dissection, 43 patients and 202 patients were included in the DHCA group and the DHCA/RCP group, respectively. Operative mortality was equivalent between the two groups (11.6% in the DHCA group and 9.4% in the DHCA/RCP group, p = 0.58). Long-term survival was similar at 2 years between the groups (p = 0.06). Multivariable analysis showed cerebral perfusion strategy was not associated with the composite outcome of operative mortality and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In treating both elective and acute ascending aortic pathologies with hemiarch reconstruction, both DHCA alone or in combination with RCP yield comparable results.

Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Emergencies Occurs Frequently Among Transfers to Aortic Referral Centers: An Analysis of Over 3700 Patients.

Background Acute aortic syndromes may be prone to misdiagnosis by nonreferral aortic centers with less diagnostic experience. We evaluated regional variability in these misdiagnosis trends among patients transferred to different regional quaternary care centers with presumed acute aortic syndromes. Methods and Results Two institutional aortic center databases were retrospectively reviewed for emergency transfers in patients diagnosed with acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcer, thoracic aortic aneurysm, or aortic pseudoaneurysm between 2008 and 2020. Transferring diagnoses versus actual diagnoses were reviewed using physician notes and radiology reports. Misdiagnoses were confirmed by a board-certified cardiothoracic surgeon. A total of 3772 inpatient transfers were identified, of which 1762 patients were classified as emergency transfers. The mean age was 64 years (58% male). Patients were transferred from 203 medical centers by ground (51%) or air (49%). Differences in transfer diagnosis and actual diagnosis were identified in 188 (10.7%) patients. Of those, incorrect classification of Type A versus B dissections was identified among 23%, and 30% of patients with a referring diagnosis of an acute aortic dissection did not have one. In addition, 14% transferred for contained/impending rupture did not have signs of rupture. All misdiagnoses were secondary to misinterpretation of imaging, with motion artifacts (n=32, 17%) and postsurgical changes (n=44, 23%) being common sources of diagnostic error. Conclusions Misdiagnosis of acute aortic syndromes commonly occurred in patients transferred to 2 separate large aortic referral centers. Although diagnostic accuracy may be improving, there are opportunities for improved physician awareness through standardized web-based imaging education.

Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Severe Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

To investigate the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for resolving gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with severe GIB and severe aortic stenosis. This was an observational study of consecutive TAVI procedures from 2011 to 2018, identified through a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients with severe GIB defined as abnormal hemoglobin/hematocrit and overt bleeding or positive fecal occult blood test. Groups were compared for differences in baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and post-TAVI outcomes. A total of 1,192 patients who underwent TAVI were identified, of which 164 patients (13.8%) were found to have had severe GIB. Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality scores were higher in the severe GIB group than in the non-GIB group (8.8 ± 5.3 vs 7.6 ± 4.5, p = 0.002). The 30-day mortality was similar across each group (p >0.05), with overall 30-day mortality being 3.2% (38 of 1,192) for the entire cohort. Of the 164 TAVIs with severe GIB, 130 (79.3%) had resolution of their GIB after their TAVI. Patients without resolution of their GIB had higher aortic valve mean pressure gradients after their TAVI (15.0 ± 5.3 vs 9.0 ± 4.3). In conclusion, TAVI was associated with substantial reductions in severe GIB. Despite higher baseline risk, patients with severe GIB achieved similar outcomes, including 30-day mortality, compared with patients without GIB. TAVI may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and severe GIB, whereas persistently high transvalvular pressure gradients after TAVI may be related to the likelihood of recurrent GIB.

The long-term impact of acute renal failure after aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term impact of developing acute renal failure (ARF) on survival after open aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: This was an observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2007 to 2021. Patients with ATAAD were identified via a prospectively maintained institutional database and were stratified by the presence or absence of postoperative ARF (by RIFLE criteria). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 601 patients undergoing open surgery for ATAAD were identified, of which 516 (85.9%) did not develop postoperative ARF, while 85 (14.1%) developed ARF, with a median follow-up time of 4.6 years (1.6, 7.9). Baseline characteristics were similar across each group, except for higher rates of branch vessel malperfusion and lower preoperative ejection fraction in the ARF group. Patients with ARF underwent more total arch replacement and elephant trunk procedures, with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times than patients without ARF. ARF was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including increased in-hospital mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, higher rates of sepsis, more blood transfusions, and longer length of hospital stay. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were significantly lower in the ARF group, compared to the group without ARF (p < .001, log-rank test). After multivariable adjustment, the development of postoperative ARF was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death over the study's follow-up time-period (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.95, 3.86, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ARF is a highly morbid postoperative event that may adversely impact long-term survival after aortic surgery.

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic root replacement.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of valve type (mechanical vs. bioprosthetic) on survival after aortic root replacement (ARR). METHODS: In a propensity-matched analysis, we evaluated consecutive operations from 2010 to 2018. Patients were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients with infective endocarditis were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, baseline comorbidities, and operative variables. Propensity score matching yielded 153 pairs of patients. RESULTS: A total of 893 patients were identified. We excluded 192 patients with endocarditis and evaluated 701 patients. Of these patients, 455 (64.9%) received a bioprosthetic valve, 246 (35.1%) received a mechanical valve. Median follow-up was 4.06 years. The proportion of aortic dissections and circulatory arrest as well as cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were similar across groups (p = .207, p = .086, p = .668, p = .454, respectively). Operative mortality was significantly higher in the bioprosthetic valve group (7.9% vs. 2.4%, p = .004). Total length of hospital stay was longer (11.4 ± 11.0 vs. 9.5 ± 10.1, p < .001) and there was a higher proportion of prolonged postoperative ventilation >24 h (21.3% vs. 13.0%, p = .007) in the bioprosthetic group. Postoperative outcomes were similar, regarding stroke (p = .077), re-exploration for bleeding (p = .211), new dialysis requirement (p = .077), long-term bleeding complications (p = .561), and reoperations (p = .755). Mechanical valve replacement was associated with improved long-term survival (adjusted HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.77, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that mechanical valves for ARRs may confer a survival benefit over bioprosthetic valves. Surgeon bias was likely to account for this survival advantage.