Real-world health outcomes in US adult patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis taking topical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Limited health outcomes information exists for patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis (hereafter, referred to as psoriasis) prescribed topical treatment(s). AIM: We evaluated clinical characteristics of patients with systemic-naïve mild to moderate psoriasis after topical use in the United States. METHODS: Data were drawn from 2017 to 2018 Adelphi Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and adult psoriasis patients, capturing data on topical treatment at time of consultation prescribed to systemic-naïve patients with mild to moderate psoriasis (i.e. body surface area [BSA] ≤ 10%) at current treatment initiation. Patient clinical characteristics before/after topical use were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: Among 304 patients (median age 43.0 years; 53.6% female), mean time since diagnosis was 60.9 months. After a mean 6.9 months on their current topical, 14.5% of patients achieved ≥75% BSA reduction, 38.9% ≥50% BSA reduction, and 50.2% no BSA reduction. Residual psoriasis symptoms included scaling (76.5%), inflamed skin (65.9%), and itching (60.4%). Most patients (71.2%) had residual psoriasis in special body areas: nails (92.3%), palmoplantar (78.9%), scalp (75.9%), and face (65.8%). CONCLUSION: We found unmet need in topical treatment effectiveness in mild to moderate psoriasis patients, in terms of BSA reduction, symptoms, and special body areas affected.

Characterizing Outcomes and Unmet Needs Among Patients in the United States with Mild-to-Moderate Plaque Psoriasis Using Prescription Topicals.

INTRODUCTION: Topical therapies are considered first-line treatment in the management of plaque psoriasis (PSO). However, data on patient-reported outcomes for topicals are scarce. We designed a survey to record the treatment experience of patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult patients on prescription topicals for mild-to-moderate PSO (body surface area [BSA] ≤ 10%) in the US. Data on treatment goals, changes in PSO after current treatment, satisfaction with current treatment (assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM]), and treatment adherence (how often current treatment was taken as instructed) were collected. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 175 patients with mild-to-moderate PSO who completed the survey, 67.4% were female, with a median age of 55.0 years and 10.8 years since PSO diagnosis. Patients reported (medians) the use of three topicals since diagnosis, with 5 years on the current prescription topical. The top three treatment goals for current topical treatment were improvements in visible skin, 97.1%; non-skin related symptoms, 62.9%; and social/emotional well-being, 60.0%. Overall, 43.4% of patients reported 0% BSA change and 5.7% reported ≥ 75% BSA reduction. Approximately 75.0% each reported improvement in itch and pain symptoms. Embarrassment/self-consciousness because of skin symptoms persisted in 72.6% of patients. Median TSQM scores for global satisfaction, convenience, and effectiveness ranged between 58 and 72, indicating partial treatment satisfaction, except for side effects, which was high (median: 100). Approximately half of patients (49.7%) reported not being highly adherent to treatment. CONCLUSION: Contrary to their treatment goals, patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals reported partial effectiveness, incomplete symptom resolution, impacted emotional and social well-being, and suboptimal global satisfaction, effectiveness, adherence, and convenience. Our findings highlight several unmet needs among topical-experienced, systemic-naïve patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals.

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease caused by inflammation in the body. Raised areas, called plaques, are one of the main symptoms. These plaques may be red, flaky, itchy, and/or painful. Living with psoriasis can negatively impact a person's well-being, especially when it affects visible areas such as the head, face, hands and nails, and/or sensitive areas like the genitals. Topical treatments, such as creams and lotions, are often the first therapy a doctor prescribes for psoriasis. Since these treatments are applied directly on the plaques, they can be messy and inconvenient. We conducted an online survey of adults with mild-to-moderate psoriasis, meaning that less than 10% of their body had plaques. We wanted to learn how they felt about their disease and their prescription topical treatments. Most people had psoriasis for about 10 years and had been using their current prescription topical for about 5 years. Approximately three of four people reported embarrassment/self-consciousness because of skin symptoms. Although three of four people reported some improvement in itch and pain, almost all people desired better resolution of plaques in visible areas. People also reported that: their current prescription topical did not completely resolve their symptoms, their emotional and social well-being was still suboptimal, they did not always apply their therapy as often as instructed, and they were not completely satisfied with their treatment overall. These results highlight the need for additional treatment options for people with mild-to-moderate psoriasis, particularly options that offer improved symptom control and are more convenient to use.

Comparability of European League Against Rheumatology-Recommended Pharmacological Treatments of Oral Ulcers Associated with Behçet's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Oral ulcers are the cardinal manifestation in Behçet's disease (BD). The 2018 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations describe treatments for BD-associated oral ulcers with mucocutaneous involvement; however, little comparative effectiveness information for these agents is available. In the absence of head-to-head trials, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) could provide useful evidence regarding comparative effectiveness of BD treatments. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative systematic literature review (SLR) and similarity assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the oral ulcer-related efficacy outcomes of EULAR-recommended treatments for BD-associated oral ulcers to determine the feasibility of an ITC. METHODS: An SLR was performed to identify relevant RCTs indexed in MEDLINE/Embase before May 29, 2019. RCT similarities for the ITC were assessed based on a step-wise process recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. RESULTS: In total, 317 articles were identified, of which 14 RCTs, reflecting 11 EULAR-recommended treatments, were evaluated in a similarity assessment. Number of oral ulcers, resolution of oral ulcers, and healing time for oral ulcers were identified as the possible oral ulcer-related outcomes. After completing the similarity assessment of these outcomes, it was determined that a robust ITC was infeasible for the three oral ulcer-related outcomes due to heterogeneity in outcomes reporting, study design, and/or patient characteristics. More broadly, the results underscore the need for and consistent use of standardized measures for oral ulcer outcomes to facilitate comparative research. CONCLUSION: In the absence of head-to-head RCTs and infeasibility of quantitative ITC, comparative assessments for BD-associated oral ulcers are limited, including comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evaluations. Healthcare decision-makers must continue to base treatment decisions on the extent and strength of available evidence (eg, robust RCTs), clinical guidelines, real-world experience, and patient considerations.

Treatment Effectiveness for Resolution of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse in a US Health Plan Population.

INTRODUCTION: Timely and effective resolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is critical to minimizing residual deficits, which can result in neurologic disability. Oral corticosteroids (OCS) and intravenous corticosteroids [intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP)] are earlier line treatments; alternatives include repository corticotropin injection (RCI; H.P. Acthar® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Contemporary insight into the use of relapse treatments and their effectiveness is needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relapse rates, frequency of treatments used, and treatment effectiveness (i.e., relapse resolution). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients ages 18-89 years experiencing MS relapse from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2015 was conducted using administrative claims data. MS relapse was defined based on established claims-based methodology. The first claim for relapse treatment (i.e., prescription or administration) was used to designate the treatment group and relapse date, respectively. Relapses occurring ≤ 30 days were considered an episode. The first relapse episode was identified for every patient. Treatment was deemed effective in resolving the relapse if no additional relapses followed within the episode; otherwise, the relapse was considered unresolved. A 5-day OCS taper following IVMP administration, designated IVMP ± OCS, was allowed. Relapse frequency, treatment use, and relapse resolution were quantified. Relapse resolution was likewise evaluated in patients continuously enrolled for 12 months before and after first treatment with RCI or PMP/IVIG, with PMP/IVIG administrations within 7 days of each other being considered a single course of therapy. RESULTS: During the study period, 9574 patients experienced ≥ 1 relapse; 26.0% of patients had ≥ 2 relapses/year. The mean number of relapse episodes was 2.6 over a mean follow-up of 2.7 years for an annualized relapse rate of 1.0. Corticosteroids were the first treatment used in 90.4% of relapses (OCS = 51.8%, IVMP = 38.6%), followed by IVIG (6.0%), RCI (2.2%) and PMP (1.5%). The proportion of patients achieving relapse resolution with their first treatment was 90.5% with OCS (n = 5710), 47.8% with IVMP ± OCS (n = 3425), 96.9% with RCI (n = 195), 50.7% with PMP (n = 73), and 43.9% with IVIG (n = 171). Among continuously enrolled patients (n = 373), relapse resolution was 95.7% with RCI (n = 232) and 66.0% with PMP/IVIG (n = 141); significant cohort differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated in other studies, OCS were generally effective. However, real-world effectiveness varied with other treatments. Relapse resolution of the first treatment with OCS was higher than with IVMP ± OCS; similarly, relapse resolution was higher with RCI as the first treatment than with PMP/IVIG. Results demonstrate RCI's effectiveness in appropriate patients. Limitations pertaining to claims-based research apply. FUNDING: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (Bedminster, NJ).

Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Real-World Clinical and Economic Analysis of U.S. Claims Data.

BACKGROUND: Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in nondiabetic adults. Approximately one third of patients with MN progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), while others may be successfully treated to remission. Patients with MN represent a high-risk population for whom management strategies can alter and improve outcomes. Currently, there is little real-world evidence regarding the burden of MN on health plans. OBJECTIVES: To (a) characterize clinical and economic outcomes during a 1-year time frame among a prevalent cohort of patients with MN and (b) compare the 5% of patients incurring the highest cost with the remaining 95%. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of commercially insured patients was conducted using MarketScan administrative health care claims data from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years, enrolled In a fee-for-service plan, and had ≥ 2 medical claims for an MN diagnosis (ICD-9-CM codes 581.1, 582.1, and 583.1). Diagnoses indicating clear secondary causes were excluded wherever possible. Demographics were determined as of the first diagnosis date; clinical characteristics (e.g., MN-specific therapy, complications, and procedures), health care resource utilization (HCRU; inpatient, outpatient including other outpatient and emergency department [ED], and prescriptions), and costs were evaluated for 1 year following MN diagnosis. Total costs and cost distribution (2017 U.S. dollars) were examined using plan-paid and patient-paid amounts. The 95th percentile was used to categorize and compare the subcohorts: high-cost cohort (HCC) patients (top 5%) and non-high-cost cohort (NHCC) patients (the remaining 95%). Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted. RESULTS: 2,689 patients were identified (60.0% male, mean age = 46.4 years). Severity and advanced disease were observed In a higher proportion of HCC patients (n = 134) versus NHC patients (n = 2,555) via adverse health outcomes, procedures, and immunosuppressant use. HCC patients used significantly more resources on average than NHCC patients (additional use): 1.7 inpatient, 1.2 ED, and 4.8 outpatient office visits; 15 prescriptions; and 64.8 other outpatient visits (i.e., outpatient, hospital, and ESRD facilities). Total MN-related cost and mean (SD) cost per patient were $123.2 million and $45,814 ($101,353); HCC patients accounted for 43.7% of total costs for a mean cost per patient of $401,608 versus NHCC patients at 56.3% and mean cost per patient of $27,154. The greatest costs for both groups were related to outpatient visits (HCC = 46.7%; NHCC = 52.8%), inpatient visits (HCC = 27.7%; NHCC = 28.6%), and prescriptions (HCC = 25.7%; NHCC = 18.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MN are significantly burdened with high disease severity and adverse health outcomes, resulting In substantial HCRU and costs. Health plan cost drivers for MN (HCC and NHCC patients) occurred primarily In the outpatient setting, followed by the inpatient setting and prescriptions. Modifiable aspects preceding progression to advanced renal disease and worse outcomes should be explored to Identify effective interventions and improve resource allocation earlier In the disease pathway, before ESRD. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Kirkemo, Pavlova-Wolf, and Bartels-Peculis are employees and stockholders of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Nazareth was an employee of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Kariburyo, Xie, and Vaidya are employees of STATinMED Research, a paid consultant to Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Sim received an investigator-initiated research grant from Mallinkcrodt Pharmaceuticals. A portion of the study results were previously presented at the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Kidney Week 2017; November 2, 2017; New Orleans, LA.

Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies. METHODS: English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.

Medication Utilization Patterns 90 Days Before Initiation of Treatment with Repository Corticotropin Injection in Patients with Infantile Spasms.

INTRODUCTION: Infantile spasms (IS) is a rare and devastating form of early childhood epilepsy. Two drugs are approved in the United States for treatment of IS, H.P. Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection, RCI) and Sabril® (vigabatrin). Given real-world variation in treatment of patients with IS, this study characterized treatment patterns with IS medications and determined all-cause health care resource utilization (HCRU) during the 90 days before initiating therapy with RCI in patients with IS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Truven Health MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify commercially insured US patients <2 years of age at RCI initiation with an IS diagnosis, per label use, from 1/1/07 to 12/31/15; presence of an electroencephalogram following diagnosis was required to assure diagnosis. Diagnosis codes and dispensed IS treatments of interest (drug classes including corticosteroids, vigabatrin, and other antiepileptic drugs [AEDs] excluding vigabatrin) before RCI initiation were evaluated. RESULTS: The 5 most common diagnoses other than IS observed in the study cohort (n=422) were "other convulsions," "acute upper respiratory infection," "esophageal reflux," "epilepsy, unspecified," and "abnormal involuntary muscle movements." Among the study cohort, 51.7% received RCI first; 38.9% received 1 drug class and 9.5% received >1 drug class before RCI initiation. Other AEDs were dispensed most often, either alone (31.3%) or with other drug classes (9.3%). Mean HCRU included 11.8 all-cause outpatient visits and 4.5 medications dispensed. Patients who received RCI or corticosteroids as their initial IS treatment had the lowest and second-lowest HCRU. CONCLUSION: In the 90 days before initiating RCI, patients with IS received multiple diagnoses and treatments, characterized by frequent HCRU. Use of RCI first (no prior IS medications) and AEDs first were associated with the lowest and highest HCRU, respectively, across all categories (all-cause outpatient visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, prescription medications).

Relapse prevalence, symptoms, and health care engagement: patient insights from the Multiple Sclerosis in America 2017 survey.

BACKGROUND: Underestimation of relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS) is detrimental to the patient as well as to their relationship with their MS healthcare professional (HCP). OBJECTIVE: To obtain direct insight into relapse prevalence, symptoms, and HCP engagement from patients with MS who responded to the Multiple Sclerosis in America (MSIA) 2017 survey. METHODS: Information on patient demographics, health insurance coverage, symptoms, disability, relapses, and related HCP interactions were captured. Descriptive analyses were conducted and relapses were annualized. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate frequency of patient engagement, i.e. speaking with or seeing their HCP during relapse with annualized relapse frequency and topics discussed. RESULTS: Of the 5,311 patient-respondents, the mean age was 51.2 years (84.3% female, 89.3% Caucasian); 40.1% were on disability, and 96.8% had health insurance coverage. A total of 72.2% of patients were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); 74.8% of patients not reporting a diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS) (n = 4819) were using disease-modifying therapy. In the 2 years preceding the survey, 73.1% experienced a relapse for a median number of 2 relapses; this corresponded to an annualized relapse distribution among all patients of 44.1% with < 1 relapse, 35.5% with 1-2 relapses, and 20.2% with > 2 relapses. In patients reporting relapses, 62.5% cited an average relapse duration of < 1 month, 10.9% cited 1-2 months, and 13.6% cited > 2 months (12.9% were unsure/didn't recall). Leading symptoms experienced with MS relapse were fatigue (77.4%), numbness/tingling (70.0%), and walking or balance issues (68.8%). With respect to HCP engagement during relapse, 46.9% of patients reported doing so always/often, vs. sometimes (27.3%), rarely (18.5%), and never (7.3%). The most common reasons cited for not engaging an HCP were that the relapse was not severe enough (57.9%), the HCP was unhelpful or didn't specifically tell the patient to contact them (30.9%), the treatment didn't work well or wasn't tolerated (25.6%), or the preference to manage alone (24.4%). A higher percentage of patients with 1 relapse coincided with the highest frequency of HCP engagement during relapse, and the highest percentage of patients with ≥ 5 relapses coincided with the lowest frequency of HCP engagement during relapse. Key relapse-related and MS-related topics were discussed more by patients who always/often engage their HCP during relapse. HCP follow-up after relapse was variable, with 35.0% of patients reporting follow-up within 1 month of first contact, 50.3% reporting follow-up at the next office visit, and 14.7% reporting no follow-up. CONCLUSION: MS relapse remains particularly challenging for certain patients; some experience > 2 relapses in 1 year, relapse durations > 1 month, and relapse symptoms that interfere with daily functioning (e.g. walking/balance by 68.8%). Approximately 25% of patients reported rarely or never engaging their HCP during relapse. Common reasons for not engaging, like HCP helpfulness and treatment effectiveness/tolerance, warrant further exploration. Results indicating the benefits of timely touchpoints on both the part of the patient and HCP during relapse include the relationship between higher frequency of engagement with lower relapse frequency and more discussion of both relapse-related and MS-related discussion topics. Survey limitations apply.

Outcomes-Based Contracting Experience: Research Findings from U.S. and European Stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes-based contracts (OBCs), a type of risk-sharing arrangement (RSA), have emerged as a promising avenue for payers to engage with pharmaceutical manufacturers to share risk and improve patient access to medicines via evaluation of real-world outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of recent OBC activity and stakeholder perceptions of these arrangements, as well as the outlook for future OBC activity from a payer and manufacturer perspective in the United States and EU-5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom). METHODS: Using a structured questionnaire, interviews were conducted with 27 experts, including 14 U.S. payers, 5 EU-5 national payers, and 8 manufacturer pricing/market access executives (4 U.S., 4 EU-5). We also used the University of Washington's Performance Based Risk-Sharing (PBRS) database and other targeted publicly available information. RESULTS: Publicly disclosed information on OBCs understates the level of OBC activity, since many arrangements are confidential. Overall, U.S. and EU-5 interviewees generally expected that 2 to 3 times more OBCs would be implemented in the next 5 years than in the previous 5 years. Key drivers included the introduction of a national OBC framework in Spain, potentially a similar framework in the United Kingdom, a growing sickness fund activity in Germany, and a U.S. movement towards accountable care. Motivation for OBCs varied markedly across markets and stakeholders, with operational feasibility noted as a significant hurdle in the United States and France. Along with improving health outcomes, cost and financial risk reduction were the primary OBC motivators for payers, while potential access or reimbursement gains were key factors for manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: Using direct input from U.S. and EU-5 payer and pharmaceutical manufacturer decision makers, this research suggests that high OBC growth is expected in the EU-5 and, to a more moderate extent, in the United States, particularly if clear, simpler OBC frameworks can be developed. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Novartis employees were involved in all aspects of this study. Vegesna and Sasane are employed by and own stock in Novartis. Nazareth and Ko were employees of Novartis at the time of this study. Frois, Demean, Carpenter, and Wu are or have been employed by Analysis Group, which received a grant from Novartis for this research. Navarro received consulting fees from Novartis for his involvement in this research. Study concept and design were contributed by Sasane, Frois, Nazareth, and Wu. Navarro, Demean, and Frois took the lead in data collection, assisted by Carpenter, Ko, and Nazareth. Data interpretation was provided by Frois, Carpenter, Nazareth, and Ko, along with Sasane, Demean, Wu, and Navarro. The manuscript was written by Frois, Demean, Nazareth, and Ko, along with Sasane, Carpenter, Wu, and Navarro, and revised by Frois, Ko, and Vegesna, along with Sasane, Nazareth, Wu, and Navarro.

Persistency, medication prescribing patterns, and medical resource use associated with multiple sclerosis patients receiving oral disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective medical record review.

BACKGROUND: In the US, the approved multiple sclerosis (MS) oral disease-modifying therapies (ODMTs) are fingolimod (FTY), teriflunomide (TFN), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). FTY and TFN are recommended with once-daily doses with no up-titration, whereas DMF treatment is recommended twice-daily (BID) and is initiated with a 7-day starter dose of 120 mg BID before up-titration to the maintenance dose of 240 mg BID. Limited information exists regarding real-world ODMT prescribing patterns to aid physician/patient decision-making. METHODS: Eligible patients for this retrospective medical record review were ≥18 years, had one visit related to ODMT initiation (index visit), and ≥1 visit within 12 months before and after the index visit. Primary objectives were to assess post-index ODMT persistency (i.e., discontinuation), prescribing patterns (medication switching, dose up-titrations, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons) and medical resource utilization (office-visits, MRI procedures, and mobility indicators) at distinct time windows of 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Chi-square or Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used for 3-way ODMT group comparisons. RESULTS: Medical records of 293 MS-diagnosed patients using ODMTs were abstracted from 19 US-based neurology clinics between December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2014 (FTY: 101; DMF: 133; TFN: 59). Persistency rates among ODMT groups were similar. MS-related medication switching, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons were infrequently observed and were similar across ODMT groups. Of DMF patients with a confirmed starting dose of 120 mg BID with ≥12 months follow-up (n = 26), the percentage who were prescribed dose up-titrations to the recommended maintenance DMF dose was 23.1 % at 1-3 months, 26.9 % at 4-6 months, 42.3 % at 7-9 months, and 0 % at 10-12 months. There were no significant differences at any time window among the ODMT groups in the number of office visits or percent of patients receiving MRIs. Mobility indicator patterns (proportion of patients with abnormal gait, wheelchair use, etc.) were consistent over time. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in persistency, prescribing patterns (medication switching, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons) or medical resource utilization (office-visits, MRI procedures, and mobility indicators) among the ODMTs. However, in a small sub-group of patients, delays of up to 9 months in DMF dose-up titration to the recommended maintenance dose were observed.

Burden of illness among patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS): a Medicaid perspective.

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an inherited intellectual disability that imposes a substantial clinical and humanistic burden on patients and caregivers. This study aimed to quantify the incremental burden of illness following FXS diagnosis in Medicaid populations. METHODS: A retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted using FL, NJ, MO, IA, and KS Medicaid claims (1997-2012). Patients with FXS were matched 1:5 to a comparison group without FXS, based on age, gender, state, and continuous Medicaid coverage. Healthcare resource utilization and costs were compared among cohorts over 1 year following first diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 697 patients with FXS were matched to 3485 non-FXS patients. Median age was 12.0 years; 82% were male. Newly diagnosed FXS patients were younger (median age: 7.0 years). During the follow-up, patients with FXS had significantly higher medication use, medical procedure use, medical specialist visits, and associated costs than the non-FXS comparison group. One-fourth of FXS patients filled prescriptions for stimulants, antipsychotics, or anticonvulsants; 25% of patients with FXS had speech and language therapy and 39% had physical therapy (versus 9%, 4% and 8%, respectively, for the comparison group). At least 44% of FXS patients visited a neurologist, cardiologist, otolaryngologist, or gastroenterologist; 92% of patients with FXS had an outpatient visit, 35% had an emergency room visit, and 34% used home services (compared to 31%-32%, 64%, 27%, and 10%, respectively, for the comparison group) (all p < 0.05). Patients with FXS had an incremental annual total healthcare cost of $33,409 (2012$) per person relative to the comparison group, while newly diagnosed FXS patients had incremental total annual healthcare costs of $17,617 (2012$) per person. CONCLUSIONS: Both established and newly diagnosed FXS were associated with significantly increased use of multiple medications and medical services, and increased healthcare costs. Treatments that could help reduce this disease burden are urgently needed.

Physician-Patient Concordance in Pharmacological Management of Patients with COPD.

A retrospective analysis of a cross-sectional, multicenter survey was conducted in United States (US) medical practices to evaluate the concordance between patients with COPD and their physicians on disease-specific characteristics. Associations between patient and disease-related characteristics with monotherapy, dual therapy, or triple therapy prescribed as COPD maintenance regimens were also examined. Eligible physicians completed patient record forms (PRFs) for up to 6 consecutive patients with COPD. Patients for whom a PRF was completed were invited to complete a patient self-completion (PSC) survey consisting of questions similar to those on the PRF, as well as several validated measures to assess the impact of COPD on patients' lives. A total of 469 patients completed a PSC that was matched with the PRF completed by their physician, forming the sample for the concordance analysis. Moderate agreement (kappa (κ) = 0.41-0.60) was observed for 79% of measures, with the lowest concordance rating corresponding to hemoptysis (κ = 0.22). There were few differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between patients prescribed monotherapy and dual therapy. Triple therapy rather than monotherapy or dual therapy was more often prescribed for patients with greater frequency of symptoms, negative impact of COPD on daily life and interpersonal relationships, and respiratory impairment based on the most recent FEV1. Diverse factors influence US physicians' perceptions of disease and treatment choices, including patient symptoms, quality of life, and disease impact. Our results highlight that concordance between physicians and patients regarding symptoms and physical function may contribute to optimal management of COPD.

Costs and health care resource utilization among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with newly acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk for lung infections and other pathologies (eg, pneumonia); however, few studies have evaluated the impact of pneumonia on health care resource utilization and costs in this population. The purpose of this study was to estimate health care resource utilization and costs among COPD patients with newly acquired pneumonia compared to those without pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis using Truven MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare databases was conducted. COPD patients with and without newly acquired pneumonia diagnosed between January 1, 2004 and September 30, 2011 were identified. Propensity score matching was used to create a 1:1 matched cohort. Patient demographics, comorbidities (measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index), and medication use were evaluated before and after matching. Health care resource utilization (ie, hospitalizations, emergency room [ER] and outpatient visits), and associated health care costs were assessed during the 12-month follow-up. Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the risk of hospitalization and ER visits, and gamma regression models and two-part models compared health care costs between groups after matching. RESULTS: In the baseline cohort (N=467,578), patients with newly acquired pneumonia were older (mean age: 70 versus [vs] 63 years) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (3.3 vs 2.6) than patients without pneumonia. After propensity score matching, the pneumonia cohort was nine times more likely to have a hospitalization (odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals [CI] =9.2; 8.9, 9.4) and four times more likely to have an ER visit (odds ratio; 95% CI =4.4; 4.3, 4.5) over the 12-month follow-up period compared to the control cohort. The estimated 12-month mean hospitalization costs ($14,353 [95% CI: $14,037-$14,690]), outpatient costs ($6,891 [95% CI: $6,706-$7,070]), and prescription drug costs ($1,104 [95% CI: $1,054-$1,142]) were higher in the pneumonia cohort than in the control cohort. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated elevated health care resource use and costs in patients with COPD after acquiring pneumonia compared to those without pneumonia.

Hyperlipidemia guideline adherence and association with patient gender.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) management have become increasingly apparent in recent years. Previous research has focused on inpatient disparities, but little is known about how patient gender affects assessment, treatment, and management of patients for hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular risk in primary care settings. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and hyperlipidemia are at high risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity. We sought to examine the effect of patient gender on assessment, treatment, and target maintenance of hyperlipidemia among patients with CAD in a primary care setting. METHODS: Chart abstraction was done for 715 patients with CAD in 55 family practices in New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania as part of the Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA) project. Hyperlipidemia assessment, treatment, and target adherence scores were determined for those at-risk patients based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommended National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) ATP III guidelines. Generalized linear models were used to determine the association of hyperlipidemia guideline adherence with patient gender, using comorbidities and age as confounders. RESULTS: After controlling for comorbidities and age, women were less likely to be assessed for lipids (p = 0.0462). There was no difference in treatment (p = 0.1074) or target laboratory values (p = 0.3949). CONCLUSIONS: Women with CAD are less often assessed for lipids than men in primary care practices. More intensive efforts may be necessary to educate physicians and patients about cardiovascular risk for women.