Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(9): e46017, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900497

ABSTRACT

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernias (TDHs) can occur after both blunt and penetrating injury. Laparotomy and thoracotomy are commonly done for the management of TDHs. Minimally invasive surgery, especially laparoscopic surgery, is being accepted as an effective and safe alternative to open surgical repair even in trauma cases. Laparoscopy also allows for the detection and management of clinically occult TDHs, thereby preventing the complications of missed or delayed diagnosis. Our case highlights the importance of timely intervention with a minimally invasive approach. A 39-year-old male presented to the emergency room after a road traffic accident. Computed tomography scan confirmed left-sided diaphragmatic rupture with gastric herniation. Laparoscopic repair of the hernia was done. He had an uneventful post-operative period. At the one-year follow-up, he was asymptomatic and was doing well. TDHs have a variable clinical presentation and radiological findings are not always diagnostic. Such cases can progress to potentially life-threatening complications such as strangulation and perforation of the herniated viscera. Timely diagnosis and management are therefore essential. A minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopy should be used for the management of TDHs in the acute setting where the patient is stable, and resources are available. In this case, once the gastric contents were aspirated via a nasogastric tube in the middle of the night, the immediate need for surgery was converted to an urgent nature, and the patient underwent surgery the next morning in a more controlled setting. In addition, timely intervention can prevent future complications that may occur if the condition is left untreated during the initial admission.

2.
Cureus ; 14(12): e32824, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699800

ABSTRACT

Herniation of abdominal contents through the diaphragm into the thoracic cavity can occur after blunt abdominal injury, resulting in a permanently acquired diaphragmatic hernia. Their clinical presentation is varied and non-specific, which can go unnoticed for a long duration. A 27-year-old male presented with right upper quadrant pain and right-sided pleuritic chest pain for the past 20 days. His past medical history included high-impact blunt trauma a few years back. His workup revealed a right-sided diaphragmatic hernia through which the gallbladder had herniated into the thoracic cavity, along with liver and hepatic flexure of the colon. The gallbladder contained gallstones which were the cause of his symptoms. The patient was managed successfully with a laparotomy and repair of the diaphragmatic hernia and cholecystectomy. After blunt abdominal trauma, right-sided diaphragmatic injury is less common because most of the trauma is absorbed by the liver, providing a protective effect. The sign and symptoms of acquired diaphragmatic hernia lack sensitivity and specificity, due to which many cases remain undiagnosed and are incidentally picked up on chest auscultation where bowel sounds are audible in the chest, and breath sounds on the affected side are absent, whereas patients have complaints of respiratory difficulty and recurrent pneumonia. Chest and abdominal imagining in the form of chest X-rays and abdominal ultrasound can help diagnose. The case we present was a unique presentation of acquired right-sided diaphragmatic hernia resulting in herniation of the gallbladder in the right-sided chest and leading to acute cholecystitis. The treatment modality is surgical repair of the diaphragm. Any patient presenting with unusual symptoms of pneumonia or abdominal pain should be investigated, especially patients with a history of blunt abdominal trauma.

3.
Cureus ; 11(6): e5031, 2019 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501724

ABSTRACT

Introduction The American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery has stated that bariatric surgery is indicated in Class I obesity patients with one or more comorbidities. However, other weight loss options, such as diet plus exercise, are available to patients with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 30 to 35 kg/m2. This study aimed to prospectively compare the results of Class I obesity patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or using a weight control program (WCP). Methods A prospective analysis was conducted of patients with Class I obesity and comorbid diabetes and hypertension, with follow-ups at 6, 12, and 18 months. Subjects were divided into two groups: the LSG group of patients who had undergone LSG, and the WCP group who adhered to a WCP. The percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) and comorbidity remission (diabetes mellitus and hypertension) were tracked with measurements of hemoglobin A1C (HBA1C) levels and systolic blood pressure. Self-esteem was also tracked using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) at 0 and 18 months. The overall patient satisfaction score was calculated using a visual analogue scale. Results Of the 150 patients enrolled in the study, 106 were included in the LSG group, and 103 were included in the WCP group. The reduction in HBA1C was more pronounced in the LSG group, and the differences between the two were statistically significant after 6, 12, and 18 months (LSG 5.6 ± 0.47 vs. WCP 6.5 ± 0.64, CI 1.04-0.73, P < 0.05). At 12 and 18 months, there were statistically significant reductions in systolic blood pressure after LSG (LSG 134.2 ± 7.16 vs. WCP 145.63 ± 5.94, CI 13.2-9.6, P < 0.05). Self-esteem levels measured by the Rosenberg SES increased for all participants, while patient satisfaction score was higher in the LSG group than that in the WCP group (P < 0.05). The %EBMIL at 6 months in the LSG group was 35.48%, compared to the WCP group at only 7.23%. At 12 months, the %EBMIL had increased twofold in the LSG group, at 68.19%, compared to 14.53% in the WCP group. At the final 18-month follow-up, the %EBMIL in the LSG group was 99.60% but was only 25.70% in the WCP group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Our study elucidates a clear superiority of LSG over any structured WCP with regard to weight reduction, improvement in glycemic control, and reduction in blood pressure in Class I obesity patients. Additionally, patients having LSG reported markedly improved self-esteem and satisfaction when compared with those who undertook a WCP.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...