ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To obtain a "snapshot" view of access-specific percutaneous cardiovascular procedures outcomes in the real world. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective study performed over a 30-day period. SETTING: Nine hospitals with invasive cardiology facilities, reflecting the contemporary state of healthcare. PATIENTS: Unselected consecutive sample of patients undergoing any percutaneous cardiovascular procedure requiring an arterial access. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures by radial or femoral access MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital (a) major and minor haemorrhages; (b) peri-procedural stroke; and (c) entry-site vascular complications. The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital death and myocardial infarction/reinfarction. For analysis purposes, outcomes were allocated to arterial access-determined study arms on an intention-to treat basis. Multivariable analysis adjusted using propensity score was performed to correct for selection bias related to arterial site. RESULTS: A total of 1052 patients were enrolled: 509 underwent radial access and 543 femoral access. In both groups, 40% underwent a coronary angioplasty. Relative to femoral access, radial access was associated with a lower incidence both of primary (4.2% vs 1.96%, p = 0.03, respectively) and secondary endpoints (3.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for procedural and clinical confounders, confirmed that intention-to-access via the radial route was significantly and independently associated with a decreased risk both of primary (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.84) and secondary endpoints (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates strikingly better outcomes of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures with radial access versus femoral access in contemporary, real-world clinical settings.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Radial Artery , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Female , Femoral Artery , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) often present electrocardiographic abnormalities and, therefore, are excluded from studies concerning electrocardiographic evaluation of ventricular repolarization. The aim of the study was to assess whether LBBB could influence dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Surface electrocardiograms of 16 patients (9 males and 7 females, mean age 58 +/- 14 years) with episodes of intermittent LBBB were analyzed. Six patients were affected by coronary artery disease, 6 by hypertensive cardiomyopathy and 4 by dilated cardiomyopathy. Maximal QT and JT corrected intervals, QT and JT dispersion, and QT and JT dispersion corrected for heart rate, were obtained before and after LBBB. We observed a significant prolongation of maximal QT (412 +/- 29 vs 433 +/- 25 ms; p < 0.05), and of maximal corrected QT (457 +/- 37 vs 497 +/- 56 ms; p < 0.05) after LBBB. Maximal JT interval, also corrected for heart rate, did not show any significant modification after LBBB. Moreover, we did not observe any significant difference in electrocardiographic parameters of dispersion of repolarization. Our results seem to indicate that LBBB did not alter significantly dispersion of ventricular repolarization. QT dispersion is considered an important marker of risk for incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. If our results will be confirmed in larger groups of patients, analysis of QT dispersion could be extended even to patients with LBBB.
