Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 13: 64, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33029353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Access to quality-assured, safe and efficacious medical products is fundamental for Universal Health Coverage and attaining Sustainable Development Goal 3: Ensure Healthy Lives and Well-being for All. To guarantee this right, there is a need for robust and efficiently performing national regulatory systems for the regulation of medical products. Well-functioning regulatory systems apply globally accepted standards which ensure that the level of control is proportionate to the level of public health risk. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The study aimed at analysing the regulatory systems for medical products in the 16 Member States of the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It provides an overview of the national regulatory systems for medical products in the region in 2017 and outlines the institutional frameworks, which enable the implementation of regulatory functions. METHODOLOGY: A survey was conducted in March-December 2017 in English, French and Portuguese. National Regulatory Authorities for medical products (NMRAs) of the 16 Member States within SADC responded to the questions asked and sent in their answers. The survey was constructed around five themes instrumental for implementation of the Universal Health Coverage actions framework. Three of the themes are discussed in this article. RESULTS: The outcome of the survey demonstrates that within SADC, NMRAs vary in terms of organisational set-up and modalities of medical product regulation. The majority are within the Ministries of Health, and a few are either semi-autonomous or autonomous. Legal frameworks for medical products are in place for some of the SADC NMRAs, although they vary in the scope of products subject to regulation. Traditional medicines, biologicals and medical devices are regulated, however not uniformly across the region. CONCLUSION: Despite major progress over the years, the survey demonstrates variable levels of governance and regulatory framework among NMRAs in SADC. The survey supports the need for shifting from the broad strengthening of the regulatory systems which exist and are underpinned by the mandates, to more product-type focused approaches. This shift will ensure that medical products are quality-assured, safe and effective for a performant Health Systems attainment of the Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development Goals.

2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 89(2): 176-8, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21252936

ABSTRACT

Medicines regulation remains an important but neglected component of promotion and protection of public health because it helps to ensure that patients have access to quality, safe, and efficacious medicines. Investing in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (AMRH) initiative provides an opportunity for strengthening regulatory capacity, cost-effective use of the limited financial and human resources, attainment of the three health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and promotion of trade and socioeconomic development for African countries and regions.


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control , Public Health , Africa , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Policy , Humans
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19680843

ABSTRACT

This study determined maize-user practices that influence the presence of fumonisin and aflatoxin contamination of maize in food consumed in the rural areas of Tanzania. Samples of the 2005 maize harvest in Tanzania were collected from 120 households and examined for fumonisins and aflatoxins. Information on whether the maize was sorted to remove defective (visibly damaged or mouldy) maize before storage and whether the damaged and mouldy maize or the non-dehulled maize was used as food was also collected. In addition, the percentage of defective kernels in the samples was determined. Ninety per cent of the households sorted out defective maize, 45% consumed the defective maize and 30% consumed non-dehulled maize. In 52% of the samples fumonisins were determined at levels up to 11,048 microg kg(-1) (median = 363 microg kg(-1)) and in 15% exceeded 1000 microg kg(-1); the maximum tolerable limit (MTL) for fumonisins in maize for human consumption in other countries. Aflatoxins were detected in 18% of the samples at levels up to 158 microg kg(-1) (median = 24 microg kg(-1)). Twelve per cent of the samples exceeded the Tanzanian limit for total aflatoxins (10 microg kg(-1)). Aflatoxins co-occurred with fumonisins in 10% of the samples. The percentage defective kernels (mean = 22%) correlated positively (r = 0.39) with the fumonisin levels. Tanzanians are at a risk of exposure to fumonisins and aflatoxins in maize. There is a need for further research on fumonisin and aflatoxin exposure in Tanzania to develop appropriate control strategies.


Subject(s)
Aflatoxins/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Fumonisins/analysis , Poisons/analysis , Zea mays/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Developing Countries , Food Analysis/methods , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Humans , Rural Health , Tanzania
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...