Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
FASEB J ; 34(7): 9433-9449, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496609

ABSTRACT

Mov10 is a processing body (P-body) protein and an interferon-stimulated gene that can affect replication of retroviruses, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The mechanism of HCV inhibition by Mov10 is unknown. Here, we investigate the effect of Mov10 on HCV infection and determine the virus life cycle steps affected by changes in Mov10 overexpression. Mov10 overexpression suppresses HCV RNA in both infectious virus and subgenomic replicon systems. Additionally, Mov10 overexpression decreases the infectivity of released virus, unlike control P-body protein DCP1a that has no effect on HCV RNA production or infectivity of progeny virus. Confocal imaging of uninfected cells shows endogenous Mov10 localized at P-bodies. However, in HCV-infected cells, Mov10 localizes in circular structures surrounding cytoplasmic lipid droplets with NS5A and core protein. Mutagenesis experiments show that the RNA binding activity of Mov10 is required for HCV inhibition, while its P-body localization, helicase, and ATP-binding functions are not required. Unexpectedly, endogenous Mov10 promotes HCV replication, as CRISPR-Cas9-based Mov10 depletion decreases HCV replication and infection levels. Our data reveal an important and complex role for Mov10 in HCV replication, which can be perturbed by excess or insufficient Mov10.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus/physiology , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Host-Pathogen Interactions , RNA Helicases/metabolism , Virus Replication , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis C/pathology , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , RNA Helicases/genetics
2.
Viruses ; 11(11)2019 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31717338

ABSTRACT

RNA viruses are highly successful pathogens and are the causative agents for many important diseases. To fully understand the replication of these viruses it is necessary to address the roles of both positive-strand RNA ((+)RNA) and negative-strand RNA ((-)RNA), and their interplay with viral and host proteins. Here we used branched DNA (bDNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to stain both the abundant (+)RNA and the far less abundant (-)RNA in both hepatitis C virus (HCV)- and Zika virus-infected cells, and combined these analyses with visualization of viral proteins through confocal imaging. We were able to phenotypically examine HCV-infected cells in the presence of uninfected cells and revealed the effect of direct-acting antivirals on HCV (+)RNA, (-)RNA, and protein, within hours of commencing treatment. Herein, we demonstrate that bDNA FISH is a powerful tool for the study of RNA viruses that can provide insights into drug efficacy and mechanism of action.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Hepacivirus , RNA, Viral , Cell Line , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , RNA, Viral/drug effects , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Virus Replication/drug effects , Zika Virus/drug effects , Zika Virus/genetics , Zika Virus Infection/drug therapy , Zika Virus Infection/virology
3.
Viruses ; 11(7)2019 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31319455

ABSTRACT

Moloney leukemia virus 10 (MOV10) is an RNA helicase that has been shown to affect the replication of several viruses. The effect of MOV10 on Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is not known and its role on the replication of this virus is poorly understood. We investigated the effect of MOV10 down-regulation and MOV10 over-expression on HBV in a variety of cell lines, as well as in an infection system using a replication competent virus. We report that MOV10 down-regulation, using siRNA, shRNA, and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology, resulted in increased levels of HBV DNA, HBV pre-genomic RNA, and HBV core protein. In contrast, MOV10 over-expression reduced HBV DNA, HBV pre-genomic RNA, and HBV core protein. These effects were consistent in all tested cell lines, providing strong evidence for the involvement of MOV10 in the HBV life cycle. We demonstrated that MOV10 does not interact with HBV-core. However, MOV10 binds HBV pgRNA and this interaction does not affect HBV pgRNA decay rate. We conclude that the restriction of HBV by MOV10 is mediated through effects at the level of viral RNA.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B virus/physiology , Hepatitis B/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Microbial Interactions , Moloney murine leukemia virus/physiology , Virus Replication , Animals , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral , Humans , Mice , Protein Binding , RNA , RNA Helicases/metabolism , RNA, Viral , Viral Proteins/metabolism
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 56(4): 2048-61, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22252812

ABSTRACT

RNase H inhibitors (RNHIs) have gained attention as potential HIV-1 therapeutics. Although several RNHIs have been studied in the context of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) RNase H, there is no information on inhibitors that might affect the RNase H activity of other RTs. We performed biochemical, virological, crystallographic, and molecular modeling studies to compare the RNase H function and inhibition profiles of the gammaretroviral xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV) RTs to those of HIV-1 RT. The RNase H activity of XMRV RT is significantly lower than that of HIV-1 RT and comparable to that of MoMLV RT. XMRV and MoMLV, but not HIV-1 RT, had optimal RNase H activities in the presence of Mn²âº and not Mg²âº. Using hydroxyl-radical footprinting assays, we demonstrated that the distance between the polymerase and RNase H domains in the MoMLV and XMRV RTs is longer than that in the HIV-1 RT by ∼3.4 Å. We identified one naphthyridinone and one hydroxyisoquinolinedione as potent inhibitors of HIV-1 and XMRV RT RNases H with 50% inhibitory concentrations ranging from ∼0.8 to 0.02 µM. Two acylhydrazones effective against HIV-1 RT RNase H were less potent against the XMRV enzyme. We also solved the crystal structure of an XMRV RNase H fragment at high resolution (1.5 Å) and determined the molecular details of the XMRV RNase H active site, thus providing a framework that would be useful for the design of antivirals that target RNase H.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/chemistry , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Ribonuclease H/antagonists & inhibitors , Ribonuclease H/chemistry , Ribonuclease H/physiology , Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus/enzymology , Amino Acid Sequence , Cell Survival/drug effects , Crystallography, X-Ray , DNA Footprinting , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/antagonists & inhibitors , Hydrazones/chemical synthesis , Hydrazones/pharmacology , Indicators and Reagents , Isoquinolines/chemical synthesis , Isoquinolines/pharmacology , Magnesium/pharmacology , Manganese/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Moloney murine leukemia virus/drug effects , Moloney murine leukemia virus/enzymology , Naphthyridines/chemical synthesis , Naphthyridines/pharmacology , Plasmids/genetics
5.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 40(1): 345-59, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21908397

ABSTRACT

We report key mechanistic differences between the reverse transcriptases (RT) of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) and of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV), a gammaretrovirus that can infect human cells. Steady and pre-steady state kinetics demonstrated that XMRV RT is significantly less efficient in DNA synthesis and in unblocking chain-terminated primers. Surface plasmon resonance experiments showed that the gammaretroviral enzyme has a remarkably higher dissociation rate (k(off)) from DNA, which also results in lower processivity than HIV-1 RT. Transient kinetics of mismatch incorporation revealed that XMRV RT has higher fidelity than HIV-1 RT. We identified RNA aptamers that potently inhibit XMRV, but not HIV-1 RT. XMRV RT is highly susceptible to some nucleoside RT inhibitors, including Translocation Deficient RT inhibitors, but not to non-nucleoside RT inhibitors. We demonstrated that XMRV RT mutants K103R and Q190M, which are equivalent to HIV-1 mutants that are resistant to tenofovir (K65R) and AZT (Q151M), are also resistant to the respective drugs, suggesting that XMRV can acquire resistance to these compounds through the decreased incorporation mechanism reported in HIV-1.


Subject(s)
HIV Reverse Transcriptase/chemistry , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/metabolism , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/chemistry , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus/enzymology , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/pharmacology , Amino Acid Sequence , Aptamers, Nucleotide/pharmacology , DNA/biosynthesis , DNA/metabolism , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , Kinetics , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Moloney murine leukemia virus/enzymology , Mutation , Nucleotides/metabolism , Organophosphonates/pharmacology , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Tenofovir , Zidovudine/pharmacology , beta-Galactosidase/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...