ABSTRACT
The WHO 14-days' test and an in vitro survey were carried out to study the efficacy of amodiaquine versus chloroquine in Abie, a hyperendemic village in the southern forest area of Côte-d'Ivoire. One hundred and nineteen children less than 15 years old suffering from uncomplicated malaria were randomised. Among these, 62 were given amodiaquine treatment and 57 chloroquine treatment. both 4-aminoquinoleines were administered at the same dose of 30 mg/kg spread over three days by 10 mg/kg/day. Before the drug was administered, parasites were taken from some patients of each group and were evaluated in vitro to both drugs. In vivo, the amodiaquine treatment shows 95% of clinical success, 2% of early clinical failures and 3% of late clinical failures. For the chloroquine treatment, the rates are respectively. 79%, 7% and 14%. However, some patients still had a level of parasitaemia for both treatments but were asymptomatic. These parasites were found to be resistant in vitro. The authors recommend that the treatment to be used in Abie must be firstly amodiaquine followed by sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in cases where there is persistent asymptomatic parasitemia.
Subject(s)
Amodiaquine/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Amodiaquine/pharmacology , Animals , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Child, Preschool , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Cote d'Ivoire , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Endemic Diseases , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Parasitemia/drug therapy , Plasmodium falciparum/drug effects , Pyrimethamine/pharmacology , Pyrimethamine/therapeutic use , Sulfadoxine/pharmacology , Sulfadoxine/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A comparative study of the in vivo sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to amodiaquine versus chloroquine has been made among children in Agou (south Côte d'Ivoire). In case of resistance to these drugs, the association of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was administered and followed by a J14 checking. We have noticed: (1) 8.47% of amodiaquine resistance versus 36.96% of chloroquine resistance (all these resistances are from type II), (2) a good clinical efficiency of the 4 amino quinolines. Only 1.69% of the subjects having resistant stocks to amodiaquine have gone feverish down to J7 whereas 10.47% of subjects have clinically resisted to chloroquine, (3) a good tolerance of drugs and an excellent clinical and parasitological efficiency of the second intention treatment. These data are in favour of using first the 4 amino quinolines (particularly the amodiaquine) in the treatment of simple bout of malaria to Plasmodium falciparum in this region. In case of resistance to these drugs, we recommend the combination sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.