Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Mil Med ; 188(5-6): e1117-e1124, 2023 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791409

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite a wide literature describing the impact of PTSD on military personnel, there is limited information concerning the results of PTSD treatment within military clinics mental health. Having such information is essential for making predictions about service members' chances of recovery, choosing best treatments, and for understanding if new interventions improve upon the standard of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data from the Psychological Health Pathways (PHP) database. Psychological Health Pathways is a standardized battery of demographics and psychometric outcome measures, including measurement of PTSD symptom severity, that is collected in military mental health clinics. We examined changes in PTSD symptom severity scores over time and developed logistic regression models to predict who responded to treatment, showed clinical success, or improved to the point that they could likely stay in the military. RESULTS: After about 10 weeks in mental health clinics, severity scores for PTSD, sleep, depression, resilience, and disability all improved significantly. Of 681 patients tracked, 38% had clinically significant reductions on the PTSD Checklist (PCL) (i.e., "treatment response"), 28% no longer met criteria for PTSD on the PCL, and 23% did both (i.e., "clinical treatment success"). For the ultimate end point of "military treatment success," defined as meeting criteria for both clinical treatment success and reporting that their work-related disability was mild or better, 12.8% of patients succeeded. Depression scores were the most powerful predictor of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery from PTSD is possible during military service, but it is less likely in individuals with certain negative prognostic factors, most notably severe depression.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Military Personnel/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Mental Health , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
2.
Psychol Serv ; 19(Suppl 2): 126-133, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34014744

ABSTRACT

In response to the USS Fitzgerald (FTZ) and USS John S. McCain (JSM) collisions in 2017, Navy Medicine developed the Organizational Incident Operational Nexus (ORION) to track Service members and conduct targeted outreach (Caring Contacts) to those at elevated risk for psychological injury after unit-level, non-combat trauma exposure. A 1-year pilot was conducted to test the feasibility of implementing ORION. During the pilot, crews from the FTZ and JSM received Caring Contacts twice, once in winter/spring of 2018 and once in the summer/fall of 2018. Caring Contacts included reaching out to Service members over email, checking in with Service members over the phone, and connecting them to mental health resources, if desired. Sixty-two percent of the crews of the FTZ and JSM completed Caring Contacts. The Caring Contacts were well received and one in five Service members requested assistance connecting to mental healthcare through ORION. Additionally, all paygrades from enlisted to officers and 66% of Service members who separated from Service requested assistance connecting to mental healthcare through ORION. Findings from the Caring Contacts also demonstrated that 50% of the crews needed mental health support after the collision, with 30% of Sailors reporting accessing care since the collision and an additional 20% requesting care during the Caring Contacts. Overall, results suggest Service members greatly benefited from ORION's proactive approach to confidential outreach. Navy Medicine is now working toward implementing ORION throughout the enterprise and collecting more data to refine the program. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Psychological Trauma , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Mental Health , Military Personnel/psychology , Psychological Trauma/therapy
3.
Mil Med ; 181(10): 1240-1247, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27753559

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates the role of psychological resilience in protecting against the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and comorbid PTSD and depression; and estimates the percent reductions in incidence of, and associated treatment cost savings for, each condition as a function of increasing resilience. A retrospective cohort of mental health care-seeking service members (n = 2,171) completed patient-reported outcome measures approximately every 10 weeks as part of the Psychological Health Pathways program. Patients with low resilience were at significantly greater odds for developing physical, behavioral, and mental health conditions, particularly sleep disorder (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.81-3.73), perceived stress (AOR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.05-7.75), and depression (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI = 2.34-3.57) compared to patients with moderate/high resilience. Increasing resilience across services by 20% is estimated to reduce the odds of developing PTSD, depression, and comorbid PTSD and depression by 73%, 54%, and 93%, respectively; the incidence by 32%, 19%, and 61%, respectively; and save approximately $196, $288, and $597 million in annual treatment costs, respectively, or approximately $1.1 billion total (a 35% reduction in costs). Using resilience as a preventive model may reduce health care utilization and costs in an already overtaxed health care system.


Subject(s)
Depression/prevention & control , Health Care Costs/standards , Military Personnel/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Adult , Cohort Studies , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/standards , Psychotherapy/methods , Psychotherapy/standards , Retrospective Studies , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Psychol Trauma ; 8(6): 702-708, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963955

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is one of the therapy interventions recommended by the Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines. However, the literature concerning the effectiveness of this treatment modality in military service members is sparse. This study investigated the efficacy of EMDR in active-duty service members. METHOD: We conducted an effectiveness study with a record review from active-duty military mental health clinics where clinical outcomes had been monitored over a 10-week period using self-report measures of posttraumatic stress and disability. Symptom scores were examined over time in 331 service members who met presumptive criteria for the disorder on the PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M), who were in psychotherapy, and who received (n = 46) or didn't receive (n = 285) EMDR. RESULTS: Results indicated that patients receiving EMDR had significantly fewer therapy sessions over 10 weeks but had significantly greater gains in their PCL-M scores than did individuals not receiving EMDR. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized, controlled trials are still needed, but these findings provide further support for the use of EMDR in service members with PTSD. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing/methods , Military Personnel/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...