Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Plant Sci ; 14: 1251919, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37954997

ABSTRACT

Introduction: We now recognize that plant genotype affects the assembly of its microbiome, which in turn, affects essential plant functions. The production system for crop plants also influences the microbiome composition, and as a result, we would expect to find differences between conventional and organic production systems. Plant genotypes selected in an organic regime may host different microbiome assemblages than those selected in conventional environments. We aimed to address these questions using recombinant inbred populations of snap bean that differed in breeding history. Methods: Rhizosphere microbiomes of conventional and organic common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were characterized within a long-term organic research site. The fungal and bacterial communities were distinguished using pooled replications of 16S and ITS amplicon sequences, which originated from rhizosphere samples collected between flowering and pod set. Results: Bacterial communities significantly varied between organic and conventional breeding histories, while fungal communities varied between breeding histories and parentage. Within the organically-bred populations, a higher abundance of a plant-growth-promoting bacteria, Arthrobacter pokkalii, was identified. Conventionally-bred beans hosted a higher abundance of nitrogen-fixing bacteria that normally do not form functional nodules with common beans. Fungal communities in the organically derived beans included more arbuscular mycorrhizae, as well as several plant pathogens. Discussion: The results confirm that the breeding environment of crops can significantly alter the microbiome community composition of progeny. Characterizing changes in microbiome communities and the plant genes instrumental to these changes will provide essential information about how future breeding efforts may pursue microbiome manipulation.

2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 77(12): 4097-104, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21515716

ABSTRACT

Earthworm activity is known to increase emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) from arable soils. Earthworm gut, casts, and burrows have exhibited higher denitrification activities than the bulk soil, implicating priming of denitrifying organisms as a possible mechanism for this effect. Furthermore, the earthworm feeding strategy may drive N(2)O emissions, as it determines access to fresh organic matter for denitrification. Here, we determined whether interactions between earthworm feeding strategy and the soil denitrifier community can predict N(2)O emissions from the soil. We set up a 90-day mesocosm experiment in which (15)N-labeled maize (Zea mays L.) was either mixed in or applied on top of the soil in the presence or absence of the epigeic earthworm Lumbricus rubellus and/or the endogeic earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. We measured N(2)O fluxes and tested the bulk soil for denitrification enzyme activity and the abundance of 16S rRNA and denitrifier genes nirS and nosZ through real-time quantitative PCR. Compared to the control, L. rubellus increased denitrification enzyme activity and N(2)O emissions on days 21 and 90 (day 21, P = 0.034 and P = 0.002, respectively; day 90, P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively), as well as cumulative N(2)O emissions (76%; P = 0.014). A. caliginosa activity led to a transient increase of N(2)O emissions on days 8 to 18 of the experiment. Abundance of nosZ was significantly increased (100%) on day 90 in the treatment mixture containing L. rubellus alone. We conclude that L. rubellus increased cumulative N(2)O emissions by affecting denitrifier community activity via incorporation of fresh residue into the soil and supplying a steady, labile carbon source.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/metabolism , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Oligochaeta/microbiology , Soil/chemistry , Animal Feed , Animals , Denitrification , Zea mays/metabolism
3.
Biochemistry ; 49(37): 8006-19, 2010 Sep 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20718459

ABSTRACT

Backbone amide dynamics studies were conducted on a temperature-sensitive mutant (L75F-TrpR) of the tryptophan repressor protein (TrpR) of Escherichia coli in its apo (i.e., no l-tryptophan corepressor-bound) form. The (15)N NMR relaxation profiles of apo-L75F-TrpR were analyzed and compared to those of wild-type (WT) and super-repressor mutant (A77V) TrpR proteins, also in their apo forms. The (15)N NMR relaxation data ((15)N-T(1), (15)N-T(2), and heteronuclear (15)N-{(1)H}-nOe) recorded on all three aporepressors at a magnetic field strength of 600 MHz ((1)H Larmor frequency) were analyzed to extract dynamics parameters, including diffusion tensor ratios (D(∥)/D(⊥)), correlation times (τ(m)) for overall reorientations of the proteins in solution, reduced spectral density terms [J(eff)(0), J(0.87ω(H)), J(ω(N))], and generalized order parameters (S(2)), which report on protein internal motions on the picosecond to nanosecond and slower microsecond to millisecond chemical exchange time scales. Our results indicate that all three aporepressors exhibit comparable D(∥)/D(⊥) ratios and characteristic time constants, τ(m), for overall global reorientation, indicating that in solution, all three apoproteins display very similar overall shape, structure, and rotational diffusion properties. Comparison of (15)N NMR relaxation data, reduced spectral density profiles, and generalized S(2) order parameters indicated that these parameters are quite uniform for backbone amides positioned within the four (A-C and F) core α-helices of all three aporepressors. In contrast, small but noticeable differences in internal dynamics were observed for backbone amides located within the helix D-turn-helix E DNA-binding domain of the apo-TrpR proteins. The significance of these dynamics differences in terms of the biophysical characteristics and ligand binding properties of the three apo-TrpR proteins is discussed.


Subject(s)
Apoproteins/chemistry , Repressor Proteins/chemistry , Amides , Bacterial Proteins , Diffusion , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Protein Structure, Secondary , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Temperature , Tryptophan
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...