Prognostic role of pre- and postinterventional myocardial injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pre-procedural and acute post-procedural myocardial injury are frequently observed in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic role of high sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTns) elevation before and after TAVI. METHODS: 106 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI were enrolled. High sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) was measured before and after TAVI (6, 24, 48, 72 hours). Post-procedural myocardial damage was defined as a 15-fold rise in hs-cTnT upper reference limit (URL) after TAVI. The clinical endpoints were all cause death, cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization at 24 months follow-up. RESULTS: Before TAVI, hs-cTnT median value was 0.03 µg/L (2.3±2.1 fold over URL). After TAVI procedure, myocardial damage (MD), as defined by VARC-2 criteria, was observed in 40 patients (38%) (MD group). In our population, logarithmically transformed hs-cTnTs were independently associated with all-cause mortality at 24 months F/U (pre-TAVI hs-cTnT: Hazard ratio [HR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.4, P=0.027). No significant differences were observed between the MD and non-MD groups for the three endpoints of all cause death (p log rank: 0.15), cardiovascular death (p log rank: 0.86) and re-hospitalization (p log rank: 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Only baseline hs-cTnT levels correlated with outcomes at 24 months of follow-up. Chronic pre-procedural myocardial injury significantly affects prognosis after TAVI.

Cardiac and Vascular Remodeling After 6 Months of Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan: Mechanistic Insights From Advanced Echocardiographic Analysis.

Background: Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on left ventricular (LV) mechanics and ventricular-arterial coupling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate both cardiac and vascular remodeling in a group of HFrEF patients undergoing S/V therapy. Methods: Fifty HFrEF patients eligible to start a therapy with S/V were enrolled. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up (FU). Beside standard evaluation, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), estimated hemodynamic forces (HDFs) and non-invasive pressure-volume curves (PV loop) were assessed using dedicated softwares. HDFs were evaluated over the entire cardiac cycle, in systole and diastole, both in apex to base (A-B) and latero-septal (L-S) directions. The distribution of LV HDFs was evaluated by L-S over A-B HDFs ratio (L-S/A-B HDFs ratio). Parameters derived from estimated PV loop curves were left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC). Results: At 6 months of FU indexed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased (EDVi: 101 ± 28 mL vs. 86 ± 30 mL, p < 0.001; ESVi: 72 ± 23 mL vs. 55 ± 24 mL, p < 0.001), ejection fraction and GLS significantly improved (EF: 29 ± 6% vs. 37 ± 7%, p < 0.001; GLS: -9 ± 3% vs. -13 ± 4%, p < 0.001). A reduction of Ea (2.11 ± 0.91 mmHg/mL vs. 1.72 ± 0.44 mmHg/mL, p = 0.008) and an improvement of Ees (1.01 ± 0.37 mmHg/mL vs. 1.35 ± 0.6 mmHg/mL, p < 0.001) and VAC (2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) were observed. Re-alignment of HDFs occurred, with a reduction of diastolic L-S/A-B HDFs ratio [23 (20-35)% vs. 20 (11-28) %, p < 0.001]. Conclusion: S/V therapy leads to a complex phenomenon of reverse remodeling involving increased myocardial contractility, HDFs distribution improvement, and afterload reduction.

Myocardial contractility recovery following acute pressure unloading after transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and different left ventricular geometry: a multilayer longitudinal strain echocardiographicanalysis.

Aim of the present study was to describe the left ventricular longitudinal strain (LS) in all myocardial layers in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in different LV geometry and to compare LS analysis before and early after acute LV unloading provided by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). 68 patients were enrolled. LS was measured from the endocardial layer (Endo-LS), epicardial layer (Epi-LS) and full thickness of myocardium (Transmural-LS) before and after TAVI. Patients were divided in two groups accordingly with relative wall thickness (RWT): concentric LV hypertrophy (cLVH) vs eccentric LV hypertrophy (eLVH). Less impaired values of LS at baseline were observed, in all layers, in patients with cLVHas compared to patients with eLVH (Endo-LS was - 13.2 ± 2 vs - 11.1±3 %, p = 0.041; Epi-LS was - 11.8 ± 1.8 vs - 9.9 ± 3 %, p = 0.043; Transmural-LS was - 12.3 ± 1.8 vs - 10.49 ± 3.3 %, p = 0.02, respectively). A significant improvement in endocardial LS (Endo-LS) after TAVI was detected only in cLVH(- 13 ± 2 vs - 14 ± 2, p = 0.011). Our findings documented that concentric LVH had better basal strain function and showed a better myocardial recovery after TAVI compared to eLVH.

Management of cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up in COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned during Italian lockdown.

INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring (RM) has significantly transformed the standard of care for patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices. It provides easy access to valuable information, such as arrhythmic events, acute decompensation manifestations and device-related issues, without the need of in-person visits. METHODS: Starting March 1st, 332 patients were introduced to an RM program during the Italian lockdown to limit the risk of in-hospital exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the modality of RM delivery (home [n = 229] vs. office [n = 103] delivered). The study aimed at assessing the efficacy of the new follow-up protocol, assessed as mean RM activation time (AT), and the need for technical support. In addition, patients' acceptance and anxiety status were quantified via the Home Monitoring Acceptance and Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. RESULTS: AT time was less than 48 h in 93% of patients and 7% of them required further technical support. Despite a higher number of trans-telephonic technical support in the home-delivered RM group, mean AT was similar between groups (1.33 ± 0.83 days in home-delivered vs 1.28 ± 0.81 days in office-delivered patients; p = .60). A total of 28 (2.5%) urgent/emergent in-person examinations were required. A high degree of patient satisfaction was reached in both groups whereas anxiety status was higher in the office-delivered group. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of RM resulted in high patient satisfaction, regardless of the modality of modem delivery; nonetheless, in-office modem delivery was associated with a higher prevalence of anxiety symptoms.

Direct oral anticoagulants use in elderly patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation: state of evidence.

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) increases the risk of stroke by three- to five-fold, especially in elderly patients, creating a huge burden on medical system as well as a negative impact on patients' lives. Balancing efficacy and bleeding risk is a challenge when considering anticoagulation therapy in elderly patients, because of their frequent high risk of both stroke and bleeding. Real world data reveal the underuse of anticoagulation in the elderly, especially due to physicians' fear of bleeding, often neglecting the thromboembolic risk. Care of elderly patients with NVAF is often complicated by factors including adherence, cognitive impairment, health literacy, risk of falling, adverse effects, involvement of caregivers, and patient-physician relationship. Therefore, shared decision making and conversations between clinicians and patients are crucial. In addition, elderly patients often suffer from multiple comorbidities, requiring multiple concomitant medications, with an increased risk of drug interactions. Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, the so-called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) - dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban - have been approved for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF. Clinical trials and real-world data show the advantages of this class of drugs compared to conventional anticoagulation in the treatment of elderly patients with NVAF and identify subgroups of older patients who may be more suitable candidates for particular agents. However, there are conflicting opinions on the absolute benefit of DOACs use in elderly patients. A key factor to consider is that elderly patients frequently suffer from renal impairment and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance are mandatory for DOACs. As each DOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, a personalized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.