Randomized, controlled trial of diabetic patient education: improved knowledge without improved metabolic status.

We randomized 749 insulin-treated patients on the rolls of the Mount Sinai Medical Center Diabetes Clinic in a controlled trial of diabetic patient education; 345 agreed to participate, of whom 165 were assigned to the education group and 180 to the control group. Cognitive scores increased from 5.3 +/- 1.6 to 5.8 +/- 1.6 in the education group, but there was no change in the control group, whose score was 5.3 +/- 1.7 before and after the intervention (P = .0073). HbA1c fell from 6.8 +/- 2.1 to 6.1 +/- 2.0% in the education group and from 6.6 +/- 2.0 to 6.3 +/- 2.0% in the control group, an insignificant difference (P = .1995). The fasting blood glucose decreased from 223 +/- 94 to 179 +/- 73 mg/dl in the education group and from 199 +/- 81 to 185 +/- 76 mg/dl in the controls (P = .1983). Triglycerides, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and insulin dosage also failed to show significant variation among groups. The foot-lesion score showed similar progression in the education and control groups. Neither diastolic nor systolic blood pressure showed significantly greater change in the education or the control group, with falls noted, particularly in diastolic pressures, in both patient groups. Differences between the groups were not significant for sick days, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, or outpatient visits. The sample sizes of the study and control populations were sufficiently large to detect a difference in means between the education and control groups in the HbA1c, the primary outcome variable, of greater than 1.0%, with alpha = .05 and a power of .95. Thus, our study suggests that patient education may not be an efficacious therapeutic intervention in most adults with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus.

Infection and diabetes: the case for glucose control.

This review summarizes data concerning the host resistance to infection in diabetes and the influence of an acute infection upon the endocrinologic-metabolite status of the diabetic patient. While it is well known that acute infections lead to difficulty in controlling blood sugar levels and the infection is the most frequently documented cause of ketoacidosis, controversy persists as to whether or not patients with diabetes mellitus are more susceptible to infection than age- and sex-matched nondiabetic control subjects. Our data obtained from the charts of 241 diabetic patients who were being followed as outpatients show a striking direct correlation between the overall prevalence of infection (p less than 0.001) and the mean plasma glucose levels (representing three or more fasting glucose determinations taken at times when no evidence of infection existed). There is a significant diminution in intracellular bactericidal activity of leukocytes with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in subjects with poorly controlled diabetes in comparison with the control group. Serum opsonic activity for both Staph. Aureus and E. coli were significantly lower than in the control subjects. Taken together, the results from published reports as well as our data suggest to us that good control of blood sugar in diabetic patients is a desirable goal in the prevention of certain infections (Candida vaginitis, for example) and to ensure maintenance of normal host defense mechanisms that determine resistance and response to infection.

HLA antigens and islet cell antibodies in gestational diabetes.

The HLA antigens of 136 patients with gestational diabetes are compared with control populations. No significant variations are observed in their frequencies, particularly for those antigens associated with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Islet cell antibodies have also been studied in the serum of 52 of these patients and 20 of them were positive, whereas only one of 37 pregnant nondiabetic women had such antibodies (chi 2 = 15.2). A very high association between ICA and DR3 and DR4 was encountered (chi 2 = 17, with two df); half of the patients positive for either one of these antigens were ICA positive. These results indicate that ICA associates equally with DR3 and DR4, against the hypothesis that this expression of autoimmunity is more a characteristic of DR3- than of DR4-associated genetic susceptibility. These patients will be followed to determine if the ICA+ individuals are at increased risk for the development of insulin-dependent diabetes.