Liver cirrhosis in a patient with alcohol dependence and autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis is the end-stage entity for a wide variety of chronic liver pathologies. These include viral hepatitis B and C, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis. In the majority of cases, liver cirrhosis remains completely asymptomatic until acute decompensation occurs. Patients may present complications of portal hypertension such as gastro-esophageal varices and upper digestive hemorrhage, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or hepato-renal syndrome. Establishing the right etiology of cirrhosis is of paramount importance as it helps the treating physician plan the best suitable treatment options and also improves overall outcome. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a chronic alcohol consumer, which, over time, resulted in alcoholic cirrhosis. Initial diagnosis comprised of alcoholic liver disease. However, a further look into the medical history of the patients indicated the presence of underlying autoimmune liver disease, such as autoimmune hepatitis, which might have also contributed to the chronic liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors can lead to liver cirrhosis. Although the most commonly found entity is alcoholism, it cannot be taken as a thumb rule for the only possible etiology. In-depth analysis and proper differential diagnosis should be carefully conducted in order not to miss out on other possible causes. As seen in our case, where an underlying autoimmune hepatitis was found to be the culprit, but due to a long history of alcohol consumption, it was masked at first instance.

Serum biomarkers predictive of cirrhosis in alcoholic liver disease as an alternative to ARFI-SW elastography.

OBJECTIVE: Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index are noninvasive biomarkers that evaluate liver stiffness in patients with chronic viral hepatitis and are able to detect advanced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. However, their usefulness in alcoholic liver disease (ALD), when compared with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse- Shear Wave (ARFI-SW) elastography, is debatable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sifted the files of all enrolled patients with ALD that were admitted to our Emergency hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. All patients had undergone ARFI-SW elastography, and APRI and FIB-4 scores were calculated. The performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores in the prediction of cirrhotic patients according to ARFI-SW elastography was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 120 patients with ALD were evaluated. All of them were male and Caucasian, with a mean age of 55.54±12.4 years. The mean ARFI-SW elastography score was 1.57±0.7 m/s, the median APRI score was 0.68 (0.1-11.6) and the median FIB-4 score was 1.8 (0.2-19.4). Stages of liver fibrosis according to ARFI-SW elastography were evaluated as F0-1 in 21 (10.5%), F2 in 35 (26%), F3 in 52 (17.5%), and F4 in 92 (46%) patients. Based on ARFI-SW elastography fibrosis stage classification, we estimated the optimal APRI and FIB-4 scores to predict the presence of liver cirrhosis (F4) by using ROC curve analysis and the Youden index. The optimal APRI score for F4 patients was calculated as >1.52 [area under the curve (AUC) 0.875, 95% CI 0.809-0.919; p<0.001], giving sensitivity (Se) 81.2%, specificity (Sp) 81.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 76%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 86.1%. The optimal FIB-4 score for F4 patients was calculated as >2.77 (AUC 0.916, 95% CI 0.814-0.922; p<0.001), giving Se 83.8%, Sp 77%, 81.4 77%, and NPV 84.3%. CONCLUSIONS: APRI and FIB-4 scores can be used as screening tools in ALD for predicting cirrhosis instead of ARFI-SW elastography measurement, which is neither widely available nor an affordable method. Additional prospective studies are required in the future to confirm this finding.

Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel methodology using industrial scanners as a reference, and assess in vivo accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners (IOS) and conventional impressions. Further, to evaluate IOS precision in vivo. METHODS: Four reference-bodies were bonded to the buccal surfaces of upper premolars and incisors in five subjects. After three reference-scans, ATOS Core 80 (ATOS), subjects were scanned three times with three IOS systems: 3M True Definition (3M), CEREC Omnicam (OMNI) and Trios 3 (TRIOS). One conventional impression (IMPR) was taken, 3M Impregum Penta Soft, and poured models were digitized with laboratory scanner 3shape D1000 (D1000). Best-fit alignment of reference-bodies and 3D Compare Analysis was performed. Precision of ATOS and D1000 was assessed for quantitative evaluation and comparison. Accuracy of IOS and IMPR were analyzed using ATOS as reference. Precision of IOS was evaluated through intra-system comparison. RESULTS: Precision of ATOS reference scanner (mean 0.6 µm) and D1000 (mean 0.5 µm) was high. Pairwise multiple comparisons of reference-bodies located in different tooth positions displayed a statistically significant difference of accuracy between two scanner-groups: 3M and TRIOS, over OMNI (p value range 0.0001 to 0.0006). IMPR did not show any statistically significant difference to IOS. However, deviations of IOS and IMPR were within a similar magnitude. No statistical difference was found for IOS precision. CONCLUSION: The methodology can be used for assessing accuracy of IOS and IMPR in vivo in up to five units bilaterally from midline. 3M and TRIOS had a higher accuracy than OMNI. IMPR overlapped both groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Intraoral scanners can be used as a replacement for conventional impressions when restoring up to ten units without extended edentulous spans.

Genetic discrimination: the clinician perspective.

Clinicians attending continuing education sessions in California were surveyed about their beliefs and attitudes regarding genetic discrimination and their knowledge of protective legislation. Two hundred seventy-one surveys were collected from physicians (n = 191) and nurses (n = 80). Most respondents lacked information or were misinformed about the existence of protective legislation (58.3%) or published cases of insurance discrimination (85.2%); 52.4% believed that mutation carriers have difficulty obtaining health insurance; 13% would not encourage genetic testing, despite a family history of cancer. Clinician concerns about potential genetic discrimination, and lack of information regarding protective legislation, may influence access to care.

Use of CA-125 and ultrasound in high-risk women.

Our objective was a retrospective study reporting on ovarian cancer screening in a high-risk female population using both CA-125 and ultrasound over a 7-year period. We used risk estimates of carrying a BRCA mutation that were based on family history. Subjects were screened with CA-125 and ultrasound every 6 months. Each of 311 high-risk subjects had between 1 and 17 screening visits. Overall, 33 of 1209 (2.7%) CA-125 results were abnormal (>35 U/ml); 226 of 1342 (17%) ultrasounds were abnormal, with abnormalities ranging from benign appearing cystic changes to more ominous patterns. Since entry into the program, 29 subjects (9%) have undergone surgery. In 20 of these, the preoperative screening was normal; in six, only the ultrasound was abnormal, and in two, only the CA-125 was abnormal (46-91 U/ml). In only one subject undergoing surgery were both serial CA-125 levels (52-91 U/ml) and ultrasound abnormal. In 7 years of screening, one patient (0.3%) has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer (stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma). Overall, 31 (10%) subjects have completed BRCA testing. We conclude that despite screening results comparable to other studies, the detection of only one ovarian cancer over 7 years is lower than expected. Explanations for this observation are discussed. Despite the limitations of CA-125 and ultrasound, we continue to recommend these screening modalities for high-risk women. At the present time, they offer the best opportunity to detect ovarian cancers early. With increasing knowledge of BRCA testing, more women may benefit from this testing in assessing their personal risk.

A genetic epidemiological study of carcinoma of the fallopian tube.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the importance of genetic factors in the etiology of fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: All pathologically confirmed cases of fallopian tube cancer diagnosed in Ontario from 1990 to 1998 were identified from the records of the Ontario Cancer Registry. Living patients were approached to provide information about their family history and to provide a blood sample for testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. RESULTS: A modest increase in the risk of ovarian cancer (relative risk (RR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.4, 6.3) and of early-onset breast cancer (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 0.6, 6.1) was observed in the first-degree relatives of the fallopian cancer cases. Five of the forty-four cases were positive for a mutation in BRCA1 (11%) and two were positive for a BRCA2 mutation (5%). Five of eighteen women diagnosed at or before age 55 were positive (28%). Two of the seven mutation carriers had a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer, and three carriers had a modest family history. Three of the forty-four cases were Jewish, and of these, two carried a founder mutation characteristic of this population. CONCLUSIONS: Fallopian tube carcinoma should be considered to be a clinical component of the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, and may be associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Genetic evaluation should be offered to women who present with fallopian tube carcinoma. It is important to consider the risk of fallopian tube carcinoma when prophylactic oophorectomy is performed in high-risk women.