1.
Nature
; 631(8020): 271-274, 2024 Jul.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38965431
2.
Science
; 336(6084): 982-3, 2012 May 25.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22628638
3.
Altern Lab Anim
; 30(3): 351, 2002.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-12166402
4.
Lab Anim
; 36(1): 68-85, 2002 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11833527
ABSTRACT
Nearly all establishments in the UK regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 had introduced an ethical review process (ERP) within 9 months of its formal requirement, although quite a high proportion of more junior staff were not familiar with it. A significant proportion of those questioned believed that the ERP has improved the quality (particularly the ethical quality) of project licences. A smaller proportion of respondents believed that the ERP has had a beneficial impact on animal work and training. Nearly all the respondents viewed animal care and accommodation as good or excellent.